CSR that Incorporates Local and Traditional Knowledge

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 107-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuya Takahashi ◽  
1970 ◽  
pp. 78
Author(s):  
Elin Rose Myrvoll

Archaeologists produce and communicate authorized stories concerning cultural heritage and the past. Their legitimacy is based on education, scientific methods and their connection with a research community. Their position as authorized producers of history is also emphasized by TV programmes presenting archaeologists as riddle-solving detectives. The main aim of this article is to focus on the dynamics between stories communicated by archaeologists and the stories pass- ed on and communicated by members of a local community, and to discuss these. What happens when stories based on tradition and lore meet authorized stories? The latter sometimes overwrite or erase local lore and knowledge connected to features in the landscape. Some archaeological projects have, however, involved local participants and locally based knowledge. In addition, one should be aware that local and traditional knowledge are sometimes kept and transmitted within a family, local community or ethnic group. Local knowledge is therefore not always a resource that is accessible for archaeologists.


<em>Abstract.</em>—The Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Sustainable Salmon Initiative (AYK SSI) is a research program in Alaska focused on learning from the knowledge and understanding of local indigenous fishing communities. From the mid-1990s, Alaska Natives have urged that local and traditional/indigenous knowledge be recognized as a serious body of ecological insights and stewardship traditions. This paper provides a survey of milestones in Alaska, from the early definitional debates and the rise of systematic methods for documentation, to the growing body of substantive information. The discussion on local and traditional knowledge at the AYK SSI Symposium in February 2007 provided an opportunity to assess achievements and identify obstacles. Participants underscored the continuing challenges of the diverse cultural context for joint research by biologists and local communities, directing attention to foundational questions of trust and respect. Local residents celebrated the great promise for local and traditional/indigenous knowledge to contribute to our shared scientific understanding of salmon and to promote respectful and effective systems of stewardship, but they were also acutely perceptive of the barriers to improved synthesis and mutual learning. The concluding section of this paper explores implications for the on-going research agenda of the AYK SSI, particularly the need for an on-going consultative process to insure that local communities and researchers are mutually aware of methodologies available and the substantive contributions made by local and traditional knowledge research. In this way, the on-going development of research in this area can draw more fully on the struggles and accomplishments of the preceding decade.


Author(s):  
Henry P. Huntington ◽  
Nicole M. Braem ◽  
Caroline L. Brown ◽  
Eugene Hunn ◽  
Theodore M. Krieg ◽  
...  

Oryx ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Sutherland ◽  
Toby A. Gardner ◽  
L. Jamila Haider ◽  
Lynn V. Dicks

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Thornton ◽  
Madonna Moss ◽  
Virginia Butler ◽  
Jamie Hebert ◽  
Fritz Funk

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter L. Pulsifer ◽  
Henry P. Huntington ◽  
Gretta T. Pecl

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document