scholarly journals Revitalizing your library faculty governance: Five tips to increase involvement

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Ashley T. Hoffman

If you’re an academic librarian with faculty status, you know that this status comes with an equal portion of benefit and burden. Some of the benefits are academic freedom, support for scholarship, and elevated status on campus (though not necessarily higher pay). Some library faculty are even eligible for tenure (though at my institution, Kennesaw State University, we are not). On the flipside of these benefits are a few things I would consider burdens, such as tedious annual reviews and extensive service requirements. Library faculty governance, I would argue, falls somewhere in between a benefit and a burden.

Academe ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Ted Finman ◽  
Phoebe A. Haddon ◽  
Donald N. Koster

Author(s):  
Steven Salaita

The fifth chapter argues that American Indian and Indigenous Studies should be more central to Palestine solidarity based on the presence of Palestine as an issue of global concern. In particular, the author examines recent debates about academic freedom, faculty governance, donor influence, and the suppression of radical points of view in the context of the colonial logic by which universities are animated.


Academe ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
DeWitt Davis ◽  
Donald J. Reeb

Academe ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 3
Author(s):  
Henry L. Mason ◽  
George Schatzki

Academe ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 94
Author(s):  
Matthew W. Finkin ◽  
Sanford Jacoby ◽  
Karen E. Lindenberg

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Butterfield ◽  
Ekaterina Levintova

Recently two new departments, the School of Broadcast Journalism and the Department of Political Science, were created at Moscow State University while leaving the two traditional departments that engendered them intact. The result has been a contestation over academic freedom, standards, and the very definition of both disciplines at Russia’s premier university. The new departments are both closely associated with United Russia, the dominant political party in Russian politics and the political movement designed to promote the priorities and policies of Prime Minister and former President Vladimir Putin. This paper examines the self-definition of each of the four departments by means of open-ended, semi-structured interviews with faculty and content-analytic examination of curricular materials, including syllabi and assigned readings. We conclude that the newer departments are somewhat more attuned to certain aspects of the international standards of both disciplines, but demonstrate little adherence to key ethical and pedagogical norms, leaving them more susceptible to political influence.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document