According to youth experts, a significant number of contemporary young people
in Western societies reach adulthood at a later age than previous
generations. This phenomenon is generally perceived as a temporary misstep
on the path to default patterns of transition established in the 1950s and
1960s. Given the current societal context, should the transition to adulthood
today really conform to that model? This paper provides an historical
analysis of transitions to adulthood to enquire whether the post-war model
can still be considered a meaningful reference today. Were routes of
transition similar or different in earlier times, or has the model always
existed? To answer this question, the paper looks at demographics in two
case countries, Finland and France, in three periods: the nineteenth and
early twentieth centuries, the 1950s-1970s, and the early twenty-first
century. The paper argues that the post-war generation?s rapid patterns of
transition w ere unique, resulting from a sustained period of economic
growth in developed societies. This has generated new pathways of transition
and a model of adulthood still used as a standard point today, even though
the current socio-economic context has changed. Transitions to adulthood are
not static. They have always evolved, mirroring the wider historical context
within which individuals operate.