Research Advisory Committee Report: NCTM Standards Research Catalyst Conference

1991 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-296
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Education Reform ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Committee Report ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Education Community ◽  
New Research ◽  
New Phase

The Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics initiated a new phase in mathematics education reform. The Standards document presents both a vision and a plan for change in mathematics instruction and assessment. The principles on which the Standards document is based establish a new research agenda (Commission on Standards for School Mathematics, 1989) that offers the potential not only to contribute to the growing base of scientific knowledge about mathematics teaching and learning, bur also to complement and inform the efforts of mathematics educators to reform current curricular, pedagogical, and assessment practices. It is both the hope and the expectation of the mathematics education community that major changes will occur in the teaching and learning of mathematics. At this juncture, we need some form of documentation of the anticipated change.

Research Advisory Committee Report: Mathematics Education Reform and Mathematics Education Research: Opportunities, Obstacles, and Obligations

1990 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-292
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Education Reform ◽  
National Research Council ◽  
National Commission ◽  
Committee Report ◽  
National Council ◽  
Nation At Risk ◽  
Education Community ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Excellence In Education

The mathematics education community is engaged in a level of refonn activity of remarkable breadth and intensity. This most recent context of educational refom1 was established in the early 1980s, in part through reports such as A Nation at Risk (National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983). The content-based counterparts of these documents include the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989a), Everybody Coums (National Research Council, 1989), Project 2061: Science for All Americans (American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1989), and the forthcoming Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989b).

Improving Classroom Tests as a Means of Improving Assessment

1997 ◽  
Vol 90 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-64
Author(s):  
Denisse R. Thompson ◽  
Charlene E. Beckmann ◽  
Sharon L. Senk
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
Education Community ◽  
Assessment Standards

Cunently much discussion is occurring within the mathematics-education community regarding assessment. In attempting to develop the mathematical power of students, the Assessment Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1995, 29) encourages teachers to make several changes in their assessment practices. Among these are the following:

A New Way of Teaching

1996 ◽  
Vol 178 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernand J. Prevost
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Education Reform ◽  
Classroom Discourse ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
National Curriculum ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Teaching Learning ◽  
Change Task ◽  
Analysis Of Teaching ◽  
Present Understanding

A new view of teaching is emerging from the work of the constructivists and mathematics education reform leaders. In particular, we examine here four aspects of teaching that must change: task selection, guidance of classroom discourse, setting the learning environment, and the analysis of teaching and learning. Several national curriculum projects are working to effect these changes and examples of their work are provided. This work has motivated individual teachers to similarly design investigations that engage students in the study of significant mathematics, and two examples are included. Assessment must also change and students must learn to become less dependent on “authority” for the correctness of answers. Finally, our present understanding of constructivism and its implications for teaching/learning must not be static; though that view now may be at the center, we must listen to those who are on the edges and expect to be changed again and again in the years ahead.

When Will I Ever Use This?

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-69
Author(s):  
Andrea Christie
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Early Childhood ◽  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Elementary School Mathematics ◽  
Teaching And Learning Mathematics ◽  
Learning Mathematics

Share news about happenings in the field of elementary school mathematics education, views on matters pertaining to teaching and learning mathematics in the early childhood or elementary school years, and reactions to previously published opinion pieces or articles.

Evaluating Mathematics Curricular Resources

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 325-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Drew Polly
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Early Childhood ◽  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Elementary School Mathematics ◽  
Teaching And Learning Mathematics ◽  
Learning Mathematics ◽  
Curricular Resources

Readers share news about happenings in the field of elementary school mathematics education, views on matters pertaining to teaching and learning mathematics in the early childhood or elementary school years, and reactions to previously published opinion pieces or articles.

Welcome to Volume 18

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Tyrette S. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Early Childhood ◽  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Elementary School Mathematics ◽  
Teaching And Learning Mathematics ◽  
Learning Mathematics

Share news about happenings in the field of elementary school mathematics education, views on matters pertaining to teaching and learning mathematics in the early childhood or elementary school years, and reactions to previously published opinion pieces or articles.

One Point of View: Reclaiming School Mathematics

1990 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Portia Elliott
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Design Change

The framers of the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989) call for a radical “design change” in all aspects of mathematics education. They believe that “evaluation is a tool for implementing the Standards and effecting change systematically” (p. 189). They warn, however, that “without changes in how mathematics is assessed, the vision of the mathematics curriculum described in the standards will not be implemented in classrooms, regardless of how texts or local curricula change” (p. 252).

Coordinate Geometry: A Powerful Tool for Solving Problems

1990 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-268
Author(s):  
Stanley F. Taback
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Mathematical Ideas ◽  
Mathematics Standards ◽  
Problem Situations ◽  
Coordinate Geometry

In calling for reform in the teaching and learning of mathematics, the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (Standards) developed by NCTM (1989) envisions mathematics study in which students reason and communicate about mathematical ideas that emerge from problem situations. A fundamental premise of the Standards, in fact, is the belief that “mathematical problem solving … is nearly synonymous with doing mathematics” (p. 137). And the ability to solve problems, we are told, is facilitated when students have opportunities to explore “connections” among different branches of mathematics.

On My Mind: The Standards—Some Second Thoughts

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-11
Author(s):  
Stephen S. Willoughby
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
National Council ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Professional Educators ◽  
The Way

Members of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics can be proud of the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM 1989). Not only has the Standards document set the course for improving mathematics education, but it has been imitated by virtually every other content-oriented teachers' organization. Thus, as well as recasting mathematics education, the NCTM has led the way toward recasting education generally. However, professional educators have an obligation to reconsider and reflect on the Standards themselves and any other recommendations made by responsible educators and organizations.

Students Generating Test Items: A Teaching and Assessment Strategy

1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 198-202
Author(s):  
Victor U. Odafe
Keyword(s):  
Learning Process ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
School Mathematics ◽  
Mathematics Reform ◽  
Evaluation Standards ◽  
Assessment Strategy ◽  
Test Items

The more students invest in their own learning process, the more they will learn. This widely documented view is supported by publications from the mathematics-reform community. For example, the National Research Council's (NRC) Moving beyond Myths (1991) and Everybody Counts (1989) and NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) have called for changes in the teaching and learning of mathematics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document