Comparative Socio-economic Analysis of Resource Conservation Technology (RCT) Adopters and Non-adopters in Wheat Cultivation in Eastern U.P. India

2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 777
Author(s):  
Santosh Kumar ◽  
H.P. Singh
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 99-108
Author(s):  
Ram B. Bhujel ◽  
Ram N. Jha ◽  
Bindeshwar Yadav

Different types of resource conservation technology (RCT) in wheat cultivation have been recently introduced and use of seed cum fertilizer zero till drill machine is one of them which was used in eastern terai region in wheat season of 2006/2007. A survey was carried out to study the productivity of wheat and compare the production between traditional and RCT method of cultivation. Altogether 31 farmers were interviewed with semi-structured questionnaires. Model used to estimate the productivity for both the methods was significant (p < 0.01) which explained 96 and 97 per cent variation due to independent variables under study in wheat production of traditional and RCT method, respectively. Farmers used 160 kg seed/ha in traditional method while in RCT method it was 122 kg/ha. Similarly, they applied 148 and 137 kg nutrients as a total of nitrogen, phosphorus and potash in traditional and RCT method, respectively. Average production of wheat grain in traditional and RCT method was 2456 and 2714 kg/ha giving average gross margin of Rs 16750.00 and Rs 23301.00/ha, respectively. This revealed 10 per cent reduction in total costs and 29 per cent increase in return by RCT method.Nepal Agric. Res. J. Vol. 9, 2009, pp. 99-108DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/narj.v9i0.11647


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
LAL SINGH ◽  
PRADEEP KUMAR SINGH ◽  
HARI BAKSH ◽  
SARVESH SINGH

Vegetable crops are conducting under Farmers Participatory Research Trial in Temperate regions of Kashmir Valley. The trials are designed and managed by farmers, the researchers have only advice for selection of the resource conservation technology (treatments). Farmers have full control over the selection of treatments to be used on his/her field. The main objectives of this type of research is to be established and demonstrate the benefits of resource conservation technologies like raised bed, furrow irrigated planting system, zero tillage etc. over the conventional practices. In these type of trial farmers are briefed about new practices. The participating farmers are encouraged to experiment their own and are given the full control over the selection of subset of resource conservation technologies to be tested on their fields with a view to assess farmer innovation and acceptability.


Author(s):  
Karri Pramodha Eswari Mounika ◽  
Jamkhogin Lhungdim ◽  
Herojit Singh Athokpam ◽  
N. Okendro Singh

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 176-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMRENDRA KUMAR ◽  
SUNIL KUMAR ◽  
D.N. KAMAT

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinesh , Kumar

The investigation aimed to find monetary benefits of Laser Land Levelling (LLL) compared to conventional land leveling (CLL) in Karnal and Sirsa district of Haryana. These two districts were selected purposively because these have the highest area under paddy-wheat and cotton-wheat cropping patterns, respectively. The equation of Aryal et al. (2014) was explicitly used to estimate incremental benefits from laser land leveling. Also, input use pattern of machine labor, seed, plant protection chemicals, human labor, yield, and irrigation was considered. In the paddy-wheat cropping pattern of Karnal district, the annual net benefits of using laser land levelling were estimated to be ` 11450.81. In contrast, per LLL operation, net benefits were estimated to be ` 34352. Similarly, on the same lines in the cotton-wheat cropping pattern of Sirsa district, the annual net benefits of LLL were estimated to be ` 7212.61. In contrast,per LLL operation, net benefits were estimated to be ` 28850. As far as the input use pattern is concerned, the study showed that machine labour and yield increased under LLL while in both districts. In contrast, all other inputs i.e., seed, fertilizer, human labor, plant protection, chemicals, irrigation, were reduced, showing resource conservation potential of LLL. Hence, the study recommended adopting this resource conservation technology and tapping its potential benefits so that farmers may get benefitted from this ultimate technology


2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 407
Author(s):  
O. Kumara ◽  
H. G. Sannathimmappa ◽  
Vijay S. Danaraddi ◽  
D. N. Basavarajappa ◽  
Akmal Pasha

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document