Identifying and ranking effective factors on deploying Business Intelligence in the Gas Refinery industries of Iran based on integrated DEMATEL -Analytic Network Process approach: case study of Parsian Gas Refinery Co

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. 194
Author(s):  
Reza Eshgarf
Keyword(s):  
Business Intelligence ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Process Approach ◽  
Effective Factors ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Gas Refinery

Analytic Network Process Approach to Risk Allocation of EPC Projects Case Study: Gas Refinery EPC Projects in Iran

2014 ◽  
Vol 567 ◽  
pp. 654-659
Author(s):  
Alireza Valipour ◽  
Hadi Sarvari ◽  
Yahaya Nordin ◽  
Md Noor Norhazilan ◽  
Seyed Meysam Khoshnava
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Significant Variation ◽  
Construction Projects ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Process Approach ◽  
Risk Allocation ◽  
Allocation Criteria ◽  
Network Process ◽  
Gas Refinery

Risk allocation is the most significant factor in risk management. Earlier research has shown that risk allocation is essential to achieve success in construction projects. Risk allocation may fail to be achieved due to lack of a mechanism for joint risk management. Successful optimal risk allocation requires one to identify and evaluate the risk allocation criteria, which interact and overlap with each other and can lead to significant variation in the decision outcome in risk allocation. This study aims to allocate the risks in EPC projects using the analytic network process (ANP) method. The ANP approach is preferable in identifying the problems of interdependence and feedback among various criteria factors. The method utilizes data that are collected through a literature review, interviews, and a questionnaire distributed to EPC project experts. The results have shown that 12 risks are allocated to the developer, 9 risks are shared between developer and contractor, and 12 risks are allocated to the contractor. In conclusion, ANP is found to be suitable in analyzing the feedback and interdependencies among risk allocation criteria.

scholarly journals EVALUASI SEKOLAH SATU ATAP TERPADU DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN ANALISIS SWOT-ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS (STUDI KASUS DI KABUPATEN PURWAKARTA)

2019 ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Abi Revyansah Perwira ◽  
Bayu Kharisma
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Swot Analysis ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
School Level ◽  
High School Level ◽  
Delegation Of Authority ◽  
Network Process ◽  
One Stop ◽  
Junior High School Level

Abstract: Integrated One-Stop School Evaluation Using Analysis SWOT-Analytic NetworkProcess (Case Study in Purwakarta Regency). One way to reduce dropout rates is through aSekolah Satu Atap Terpadu. One of the regencies in West Java that has organized a SekolahSatu Atap Terpadu as well as the object of this research is Purwakarta regency. By using SWOTAnalyticNetwork Process(ANP)analysis, thisstudyseekstoevaluatewhile providingalternativepolicies for the development of Sekolah Satu Atap Terpadu in Purwakarta regency. The data inthis study were obtained by filling out questionnaires by respondents online through Google Form,where respondents were actors who were directly involved in the implementation of a SekolahSatu Atap Terpadu. From the analysis results obtained Strengths and Threats occupy the highestvalue. Strengths include students could continue their education up to junior high school level andlocal government supports both in terms of budget and curriculum. While Threats, among others,school management has become more complex and the delegation of authority from the central andregional governments is not clear. Therefore, the ST strategy can be used as an alternative policyin increasing Strengths and minimizing Threats.Keywords: Sekolah Satu Atap Terpadu; SWOT Analysis; Analytic Network Process (ANP).

An analytic network process model for hospital facilities management performance evaluation

Facilities ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph H.K. Lai ◽  
Huiying (Cynthia) Hou ◽  
David J. Edwards ◽  
P.L. Yuen
Keyword(s):  
Performance Evaluation ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Evaluation Model ◽  
Analytic Network Process ◽  
Facilities Management ◽  
Focus Group Study ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Network Process

Purpose This study aims to establish a rigorous model that can pragmatically evaluate the facilities management (FM) performance of hospitals. Design/methodology/approach Among the applicable performance indicators that were identified from extant literature, a focus group study shortlisted ten key performance indicators (KPIs) in four categories (safety, physical, financial and environmental) and verified their practicality. Using the analytic network process (ANP) method to process the focus group’s responses yielded importance weightings for the KPIs and developed the intended evaluation model. This model was then validated by a case study. Findings From the empirical data collected, two types of FM performance data and two scenarios of KPI scores were identified. To process these data and scores, a robust calculation method was devised and then proved useful in obtaining an overall score for holistic hospital FM performance. The case study confirmed the appropriateness and validity of the model developed. Research limitations/implications Through illustrating how the ANP method could be applied to develop an FM performance evaluation model, the study contributes knowledge to the multi-criteria decision-making domain. Despite the geographical limitation of the model established (i.e. centered around a group of hospitals investigated in Hong Kong), the study can serve as a reference for developing performance evaluation models for other buildings or infrastructures globally. Practical implications The model constitutes a practical tool for evaluating the FM performance of hospitals. Using this model on a regular basis will enable performance benchmarking and hence, continuous improvement of FM services. Originality/value The ANP model established is the first of its kind tailored for evaluation of hospital FM performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document