scholarly journals Open carpal release using local anesthesia without a tourniquet: Does bleeding tendency affect the outcome?

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 597-603
Author(s):  
Seongwon Lee ◽  
Sangho Oh ◽  
Daegu Son
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Complete Disappearance ◽  
Bleeding Tendency ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Preoperative Score

Background The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical results of minimal single palmar-incision carpal tunnel release without a tourniquet.Methods We reviewed the medical records of 75 patients (90 cases of carpal tunnel syndrome) who underwent minimal single-palmar incision carpal tunnel release without a tourniquet from June 2010 to January 2018. Ten patients had a bleeding tendency. We compared the preoperative and postoperative Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) scores. We also analyzed outcomes and complications according to the presence of a bleeding tendency.Results In all cases, there was a complete disappearance or marked improvement in symptoms within 6 months, with no recurrence. The postoperative BCTQ score showed a significant improvement compared to the preoperative score, and no statistically significant difference in BCTQ scores was detected according to the presence of a bleeding tendency.Conclusions Carpal tunnel release without a tourniquet using a minimal single palmar incision is effective and reliable. This technique prevents unnecessary pain associated with the tourniquet and is especially helpful in patients with a bleeding tendency or those treated with hemodialysis.

The Effect of Hand Dominance on Patient-Reported Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients with Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (03) ◽  
pp. 303-308
Author(s):  
Qian Ying TANG ◽  
Wei Hong LAI ◽  
Shian Chao TAY
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Hand Dominance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Background: There is a paucity of studies in published literature that examines the effect of hand dominance on the resolution of symptoms following a carpal tunnel release. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of hand dominance on the resolution of symptoms following surgical decompression in patients with severe and moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: Bilateral carpal tunnel release (total 90 open and 84 endoscopic) was performed on 87 patients (11 males, 76 females) presenting with bilateral severe or moderate carpal tunnel syndrome of equal severity. Patient-reported outcome of resolution of symptoms were recorded, with patients followed up until complete resolution of symptoms or last recorded consultation (mean follow-up duration 11.4 months, range 3.1 to 32.4 months). Results: In patients with bilateral severe carpal tunnel syndrome, a larger proportion of non-dominant hand (75.4%) achieved complete resolution compared to dominant hand (72.1%), and did so at a statistically shorter time (mean: 52.3 days) than the dominant hand (mean: 81.0 days). However, there was no statistically significant difference between proportion of patients and time taken before complete resolution of symptoms between dominant and non-dominant hand in patients with bilateral moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. Conclusions: Symptoms in the non-dominant hand resolved faster after carpal tunnel release in patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome. We postulate that greater daily activity by the dominant hand compared to the non-dominant hand may be a contributing factor to its slower rate of symptoms resolution post-surgically in patients with bilateral severe carpal tunnel syndrome. This effect of hand dominance is not evident in post-surgical patients with moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.

Which Factors Affect the Rate of Surgery Performed in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. 562-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yo-Han Lee ◽  
Jihyeung Kim ◽  
Jaewoo Cho ◽  
Min Ho Lee ◽  
Sohee Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Dominant Hand ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Electrophysiologic Test ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Age Over 60

Background: Carpal tunnel release is recommended when patients have positive electrophysiologic test and their symptoms are not resolved in spite of conservative treatment. However, only some of them eventually undergo the surgery. The purposes of this study, therefore, were to evaluate the rate of carpal tunnel release performed among the patients with positive electrophysiologic test, and to identify which factors were associated with the rate of the surgery. Methods: Subjects of this study were 865 wrists of 508 patients (90 males and 418 females) who were diagnosed as carpal tunnel syndrome between January 2013 and December 2016. The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome was confirmed by electrophysiologic test, and only the patients who were followed up for more than 1 year were enrolled in this study. The average age at the time of the electrophysiologic test performed was 61.4 years, and the severity of carpal tunnel syndrome was evaluated according to the Bland scale (Gr 1–6) based on the electrophysiologic test. Whether or not the patients received carpal tunnel release was evaluated at the last follow-up visit. Results: Among the 865 wrists, carpal tunnel release was performed on 528 wrists (61%). Rate of the surgery performed significantly increased in patients with more severe grades on electrophyisiologic test. More patients in female (63.3%) than in male (50.3%) and more patients with age under 60 (67.5%) than age over 60 (57.1%) received the surgery. However, there was no significant difference in the rate of carpal tunnel release according to the bilaterality or dominant hand. Conclusions: The rate of carpal tunnel release among the patients diagnosed and confirmed as carpal tunnel syndrome was not higher than we expected. We should also pay more attention to the patients who did not undergo carpal tunnel release and investigate the reasons why those patients did not undergo surgery.

COMPARISON OF CLINICAL RESULTS BETWEEN ELDERLY AND YOUNGER PATIENTS FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE SURGERY FOR IDIOPATHIC CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME

Hand Surgery ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (01) ◽  
pp. 59-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aya Yoshida ◽  
Ichiro Okutsu ◽  
Ikki Hamanaka
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Muscle Power ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Recovery Rates ◽  
Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Touch Sensation

We retrospectively analyzed clinical results of 107 hands of an elderly idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome group (65 years old and older) and 234 hands of a younger group (under 65 years old) following endoscopic carpal canal release surgery. There were statistical differences in recovery rates for tingling, pain sensation and touch sensation (p < 0.01) and recovery periods of touch sensation (p < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in recovery rates, periods of thumb abduction muscle power, and recovery rates of electrophysiological examination results. Cervical spondylosis may affect postoperative recovery of subjective sensory disturbance, especially in the elderly group. From these results, in elderly patients we recommend primary minimally invasive endoscopic carpal canal release surgery and only apply primary opponoplasty in cases when the patient strongly wishes reconstruction faster than six months.

Neurophysiological Recovery After Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression: Comparison of Simple Decompression and Decompression with Epineurotomy

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. BORISCH ◽  
P. HAUSSMANN
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Nerve Conduction ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Nerve Conduction Studies ◽  
Motor Latency ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Open Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Simple Decompression

Two hundred and seventy-three patients with carpal tunnel syndrome without advanced neurophysiological changes (distal motor latency below 11 ms) were randomized to treatment by open carpal tunnel release with, or without, epineurotomy. Patients were examined clinically and by nerve conduction studies preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. We found no statistically significant difference between simple decompression and decompression combined with epineurotomy with regard to either the clinical or the neurophysiological outcome.

Clinical Update: Assessing Maximum Medical Improvement in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 4-5
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham ◽  
James B. Talmage
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Hand Function ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Medical Evaluation ◽  
Nerve Recovery ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Permanent impairment cannot be assessed until the patient is at maximum medical improvement (MMI), but the proper time to test following carpal tunnel release often is not clear. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) states: “Factors affecting nerve recovery in compression lesions include nerve fiber pathology, level of injury, duration of injury, and status of end organs,” but age is not prognostic. The AMA Guides clarifies: “High axonotmesis lesions may take 1 to 2 years for maximum recovery, whereas even lesions at the wrist may take 6 to 9 months for maximal recovery of nerve function.” The authors review 3 studies that followed patients’ long-term recovery of hand function after open carpal tunnel release surgery and found that estimates of MMI ranged from 25 weeks to 24 months (for “significant improvement”) to 18 to 24 months. The authors suggest that if the early results of surgery suggest a patient's improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and an examination shows few or no symptoms, the result can be assessed early. If major symptoms and ADL problems persist, the examiner should wait at least 6 to 12 months, until symptoms appear to stop improving. A patient with carpal tunnel syndrome who declines a release can be rated for impairment, and, as appropriate, the physician may wish to make a written note of this in the medical evaluation report.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical options for recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome: simple decompression versus coverage of the median nerve

2021 ◽  
pp. 175319342110017
Author(s):  
Saskia F. de Roo ◽  
Philippe N. Sprangers ◽  
Erik T. Walbeehm ◽  
Brigitte van der Heijden
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Median Nerve ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Open Release ◽  
Flap Coverage ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

We performed a systematic review on the success of different surgical techniques for the management of recurrent and persistent carpal tunnel syndrome. Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria and were grouped by the type of revision carpal tunnel release, which were simple open release, open release with flap coverage or open release with implant coverage. Meta-analysis showed no difference, and pooled success proportions were 0.89, 0.89 and 0.85 for simple open carpal tunnel release, additional flap coverage and implant groups, respectively. No added value for coverage of the nerve was seen. Our review indicates that simple carpal tunnel release without additional coverage of the median nerve seems preferable as it is less invasive and without additional donor site morbidity. We found that the included studies were of low quality with moderate risk of bias and did not differentiate between persistent and recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome.

scholarly journals Gabapentin as an adjuvant therapy to splinting in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Ahmed ◽  
Osama G. Hassan ◽  
Ahmed A. Khalifa
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pinch Strength ◽  
Symptom Severity Scale ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Background Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common upper limb entrapment neuropathy; severe cases are treated surgically and mild to moderate can be managed conservatively. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to define the efficacy of gabapentin as an adjuvant to splinting in the treatment of mild to moderate CTS. Methods A systematic search through 13 databases, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting the use of gabapentin with splinting in CTS were included and analyzed. Results Three RCTs including 170 patients were eligible. There was no significant difference between gabapentin plus splinting and splinting alone in 5 measured parameters: (1) Symptom Severity Scale (SSS) [MD (95% CI) = − 0.76 (− 2.46–0.93), p = 0.378], (2) Functional Status Scale (FSS) [MD (95% CI) = − 0.23 (− 1.40–0.94), p = 0.701], (3) visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess pain [MD (95% CI) = − 0.6 (− 1.47–0.27), p = 0.174], (4) Grip strength [MD (95% CI) = − 0.11 (− 0.70–0.48), p = 0.718], and (5) pinch strength [MD (95% CI) = 0.72 (− 0.10–1.54), p = 0.083]. Conclusion This review provides low-quality evidence that gabapentin plus nocturnal splinting is not superior to splinting alone. More high-quality trials are needed to determine the role of this drug as an adjuvant in the management of CTS.

scholarly journals Ultrasound-Guided Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A New Interventional Procedure

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (04) ◽  
pp. 248-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antoine Hakime ◽  
Jonathan Silvera ◽  
Pascal Richette ◽  
Rémy Nizard ◽  
David Petrover
Keyword(s):  
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Carpal Tunnel ◽  
Interventional Procedure ◽  
Carpal Tunnel Release ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Recent Contribution ◽  
Invasive Approach ◽  
Guided Surgery ◽  
Tunnel Syndrome ◽  
Meta Analyses

AbstractCarpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may be treated surgically if medical treatment fails. The classical approach involves release of the flexor retinaculum by endoscopic or open surgery. Meta-analyses have shown that the risk of nerve injury may be higher with endoscopic treatment. The recent contribution of ultrasound to the diagnosis and therapeutic management of CTS opens new perspectives. Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release via a minimally invasive approach enables the whole operation to be performed as a percutaneous radiological procedure. The advantages are a smaller incision compared with classical techniques; great safety during the procedure by visualization of anatomic structures, particularly variations in the median nerve; and realization of the procedure under local anesthesia. These advantages lead to a reduction in postsurgical sequelae and more rapid resumption of daily activities and work. Dressings are removed by the third day postsurgery. Recent studies seem to confirm the medical, economic, and aesthetic benefits of this new approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document