Point: Combination Versus Single-Agent Chemotherapy: The Argument for Sequential Single Agents

2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 766-770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison K. Conlin ◽  
Andrew D. Seidman

Metastatic breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and treatment decisions depend on several individualized patient and tumor characteristics. Although combination therapy often shows improved response rates in metastatic breast cancer, few studies have shown superiority in overall survival. The choice of combination versus sequential single-agent treatment, therefore, must consider many factors, with no one strategy right for all patients. This article reviews several important clinical trials that address this issue, and argues for single-agent sequential therapy for most patients with metastatic breast cancer.

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (17) ◽  
pp. 1174-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima Cardoso ◽  
Philippe L. Bedard ◽  
Eric P. Winer ◽  
Olivia Pagani ◽  
Elzbieta Senkus-Konefka ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 184 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-172
Author(s):  
Hope S. Rugo ◽  
Veronique Dieras ◽  
Javier Cortes ◽  
Debra Patt ◽  
Hans Wildiers ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose In MONARCH 1 (NCT02102490), single-agent abemaciclib demonstrated promising efficacy activity and tolerability in a population of heavily pretreated women with refractory HR+, HER2− metastatic breast cancer (MBC). To help interpret these results and put in clinical context, we compared overall survival (OS) and duration of therapy (DoT) between MONARCH 1 and a real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort. Methods The real-world chemotherapy cohort was created from a Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived database based on key eligibility criteria from MONARCH 1. The chemotherapies included in the cohort were single-agent capecitabine, gemcitabine, eribulin, or vinorelbine. Results were adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical differences using Mahalanobis distance matching (primary analysis) and entropy balancing (sensitivity analysis). OS and DoT were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression. Results A real-world single-agent chemotherapy cohort (n = 281) with eligibility criteria similar to the MONARCH 1 population (n = 132) was identified. The MONARCH 1 (n = 108) cohort was matched to the real-world chemotherapy cohort (n = 108). Median OS was 22.3 months in the abemaciclib arm versus 13.6 months in the matched real-world chemotherapy cohort with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.54. The median DoT was 4.1 months in MONARCH 1 compared to 2.9 months in the real-world chemotherapy cohort with HR of 0.76. Conclusions This study demonstrates an approach to create a real-world chemotherapy cohort suitable to serve as a comparator for trial data. These exploratory results suggest a survival advantage and place the benefit of abemaciclib monotherapy in clinical context.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11515-11515
Author(s):  
D. Guarneri ◽  
R. Ratti ◽  
A. Venturino ◽  
G. Addamo ◽  
Z. Coccorullo ◽  
...  

11515 Background: Historically anthracyclines have been considered the most active agents in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Docetaxel (TXT) has challenged this belief. Aims: Evaluate response rates, toxicity and time to progression in patients with MBC receiving single agent TXT as first line treatment. Methods: MBC patients received first line single agent treatment according to one of the following schedules: TXT 35 mg/m2 iv weekly for 6 wks q 8 wks (Group 1) or TXT 100 mg/m2 iv day 1 q 3 weeks (Group 2). Adjuvant chemotherapy was FAC (600,50,600) day 1 q 21 days for 6 courses in all cases so treated. Results: Conclusions: It appears that results with single agent TXT obtained in clinical practice are comparable to those reported in Phase II-III trials (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively ) using the same regimens. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1063-1063
Author(s):  
A. Y. Salmon ◽  
B. Uziely ◽  
A. Meirowitz ◽  
N. Sharon ◽  
T. Peretz

1063 Background: Less than 10% of breast cancer patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease upon initial diagnosis. Once metastases are detected, median survival ranges between 18 and 24 months. Many new chemotherapy agents, hormonal therapy, monoclonal antibodies and supportive care options were presented during the last decade. Although a few randomized trials have demonstrated improvement in survival for various agents, it has not been clear whether the overall survival of these patients has improved. In this study, we analyzed the survival of patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer in during the 1990’s Methods: We have analyzed 874 patients diagnosed with breast cancer at our Institute in the years 1991–1994 and 1102 patients in 1996–1999. Tumor characteristics, treatments, and the outcomes of these patients were compared. We used Kaplan-Meier, Wilcoxon test and Cox proportional hazard in order to investigate variants between the 2 groups. Results: After excluding all women with no evidence of metastatic disease at diagnosis, we analyzed 96 patients. No major difference in tumor characteristics was found between the group of patients diagnosed in the early 1990’s and the group diagnosed in the late 1990’s. We found a significant relationship between the period of diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer and survival: median survival was 19 months for the first group and 35 months for the second group (p=0.0398, 95% C.I), with 5-year overall survival rates 8% for patients diagnosed in the early 1990’s and 25% for patients diagnosed in the late 1990’s, p=0.0497. Two years survival was 25% and 60% respectively, although insignificant, p = 0.0941. Although there was no significant difference in number of chemotherapy courses given in the 2 groups, many more new generation treatments were used for the late 90th group. The Hazard of death within 5 years for patients treated with at least one new generation protocol was 0.53, p= 0.004. Conclusions: This study suggests that there has been significant survival improvement in breast cancer patients diagnosed with synchronous metastasis during the second half of the 1990’s. This improvement can be explained by the introduction of new treatments agents and strategies during the last decade No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 1621-1629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Burris ◽  
Denise Yardley ◽  
Suzanne Jones ◽  
Gerry Houston ◽  
Catherine Broome ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine the response rate of trastuzumab as first-line therapy in patients with HER-2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. To assess the feasibility and toxicity of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without trastuzumab following initial treatment with trastuzumab. Patients and Methods Sixty-one patients received trastuzumab (8 mg/kg followed by 4 mg/kg/wk) for 8 weeks. Responding patients received 8 additional weeks of trastuzumab (4 mg/kg/wk), and then proceeded to receive trastuzumab (2 mg/kg) in combination with paclitaxel 70 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the curve, 2) weekly for 6 weeks followed by 2 weeks rest. Stable patients after the initial 8 weeks of trastuzumab proceeded to treatment with trastuzumab, paclitaxel, and carboplatin. Patients with disease progression during the initial 8 weeks had the trastuzumab discontinued and were treated with weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin. Results Weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin with or without trastuzumab was well tolerated. Fifty-two patients were assessable for response and all 61 patients were assessable for survival. Seventeen (33%) of 52 patients experienced a minor/partial response to single-agent trastuzumab and received 8 additional weeks of single-agent trastuzumab. Fifteen (29%) of 52 patients had stable disease and proceeded to receive paclitaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab. Thirty-one patients with measurable disease were assessable for response after initial single-agent trastuzumab followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin/trastuzumab. An overall response rate of 84% (eight complete responses/18 partial responses), median time to progression of 14.2 months, and median overall survival of 32.2 months was reported with the triplet combination. In the patients treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin alone after disease progression on initial single-agent trastuzumab, an overall response rate of 69% (one complete response/10 partial responses), median time to progression of 8.3 months, and median overall survival of 22.2 months was reported. Median time to progression for all 61 patients is 10 months and the median overall survival is 26.7 months. Conclusion This trial confirms the activity and tolerability of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with HER-2 overexpressing metastatic breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document