scholarly journals Prevalence and Safety of Off-Label Use of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Older Patients With Breast Cancer: Estimates From SEER-Medicare Data

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne A. Eaton ◽  
Camelia S. Sima ◽  
Katherine S. Panageas
SpringerPlus ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Hamel ◽  
Douglas S McNair ◽  
Nicholas J Birkett ◽  
Donald R Mattison ◽  
Anthony Krantis ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7054-7054
Author(s):  
Andrew Mark Brunner ◽  
Shicheng Weng ◽  
Angel M. Cronin ◽  
Amir Tahmasb Fathi ◽  
Richard M. Stone ◽  
...  

7054 Background: Lenalidomide (LEN) is approved for patients with lower-risk MDS with del5q who are transfusion-dependent (TD). We aimed to assess the prevalence and complications associated with LEN use in non-TD older patients with MDS. Methods: Using the SEER-Medicare database we identified Medicare enrollees diagnosed with MDS from 2007-2011. Medicare part D claims were analyzed for evidence of LEN use. CPT, HCPCS, and ICD-9 codes were used to characterize TD MDS (claims for ≥ 2 RBC transfusions within 8 weeks prior to LEN), complications, and baseline risk per SEER-Medicare MDS Risk Score (SMMRS; Uno, Leuk Res 2014). Incident complications during LEN were noted if there were no prior claims for the same within a 1-yr look-back window. Results: Among 469 patients initiating LEN (median age 78 years), 77% received it first-line, and 23% after a hypomethylating agent. Among all, 19% had del5q, 37% had non-del5q MDS, and 44% no histology specified (MDS NOS). SMMRS risk was evenly distributed between low (36%), intermediate (30%), and high (34%). Only 42% of patients were TD at the time of first LEN prescription, and 26% had not been transfused within six months prior to LEN. Non-TD patients receiving LEN were more likely to have lower-risk disease (p = .004), and less likely to have pre-treatment thrombocytopenia (p = .005) or neutropenia (p = .003); they did not differ significantly in age (p = .85), documentation of del5q (p = .51), comorbidity (p = .65) or treatment center volume (p = .80). Median days on LEN for the non-TD was 121. Incident complications post-LEN among the non-TD are shown. Conclusions:These data suggest there is widespread off-label use of LEN in older patients with MDS, as many receive the drug who are not TD. Moreover, off-label exposure to LEN in these patients is associated with a sizable risk of incident complications, which is difficult to justify given they are already living free of transfusion dependence. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18016-e18016
Author(s):  
Yan Xing ◽  
Ying Xu ◽  
Funda Meric-Bernstam ◽  
Jenny Chee Ning Chang ◽  
Ya-Chen T. Shih

e18016 Background: The use of targeted oral cancer medications has increased significantly since 2001. Everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor was first approved for cancer treatment by FDA as second line for patients with advanced renal cancer. Subsequently it has been approved for advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in 2011 and breast cancer in 2012 respectively. Off-label use is common in oncology practice. The objective of this study is to assess prescription trends, especially off-label use of everolimus, among non-elderly cancer patients with private insurance in the United States from 2009 to 2014. Methods: Data from the MarketScan database were analyzed. Between 2009 to 2014, 4,728 cancer patients with at least one everolimus prescription were included in the analyses. The diagnosis which incurred the most recently to the initial everolimus use in each calendar year was recorded. Off-label use was defined as using everolimus by all of the cancer types except of renal cancer in 2009-2014, NET in 2011-2014 and breast cancer in 2012-2014. Results: The number of patients received everolimus has increased significantly from 243 in 2009 to 1,194 in 2014. The most common diagnoses associated with everolimus use were breast cancer (42%), followed by renal cancer (24%), and NET (7%). Off-label use of everolimus increased from 29% in 2009 to 47% in 2011 then decreased to 23% in 2014. The 3 most common diagnoses associated with off-label use of everolimus were secondary malignancies (30.7%), breast cancer (10.4%) and liver cancer (5%) in 2009-2011, compared to secondary malignancies (47.3%), brain cancer (4.2%) and lung cancer (3.9%) in 2012-2014. The off-label use in female has decreased significantly from 32% in 2009 to 19% in 2014 (p = 0.03). There was no statistical difference in off-label use of everolimus by geographic region. Conclusions: Analyses of MarketScan data suggest off-label use of everolimus is common among US cancer patients, especially in lung, liver and brain cancer and secondary malignancies after the approved indication was expanded to breast cancer in 2012. Further research of the factors associated with off-label use of everolimus and its economic implication is needed.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1016-1016
Author(s):  
W. Dean-Colomb ◽  
S. Fang ◽  
W. Smith ◽  
L. Michaud ◽  
G. N. Hortabagyi ◽  
...  

1016 Background: Despite reports of widespread use of off-label agents in cancer treatment, little is known about the off-label use of agents in the treatment of breast cancer patients. Methods: We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) - Medicare linked database to identify 2082 persons older than 65 years who were diagnosed with distant stage breast cancer between 1991 and 2002 and who were treated with chemotherapy between diagnosis and death. Off versus on-label classification was based upon FDA-approved indication in the treatment of breast cancer. We calculated the percentage of patients receiving off-label chemotherapy and used multivariate logistic regression models to estimate predictors of off-label chemotherapy use. We also evaluated the appropriateness of off-label chemotherapy drugs using DRUGDEX classifications. Results: Overall, 34.9% of patients were treated with off-label chemotherapy drugs. Of the thirty-six agents that were used to treat these patients, only 8 (22%) were FDA-approved for use in the treatment of breast cancer. Off-label use was least common in patients age 80 years and older (OR 1.93, 95% 1.35–2.76 for 80+ vs. 66–70 years) and varied by diagnosis year and geographic region. The most commonly used off-label agents were vinorelbine and gemcitabine, with 16.0% and 8.4% of patients receiving these agents, respectively. While 71% of the drugs used off-label lacked supporting evidence for their use in the treatment of breast cancer, these drugs were used in a small number of patients. Only 6.7% of patients were treated with drugs considered inappropriate for use in the treatment of breast cancer. Conclusions: Off-label chemotherapy use is widespread among patients with metastatic breast cancer. However, the majority of patients who received off-label chemotherapy received drugs with scientific data supporting such use. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document