scholarly journals Communication ethics and the receiver: Outline for an ethic of planned communication

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (63) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Jan Foght Mikkelsen
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Problem ◽  
Ethical Norm ◽  
Communication Ethics ◽  
Common Ethic

The author wants to outline a spedial ethic for planned communication, that is, to delimit the field, the ethical problem, to establish a criterion for evaluation, and show how it works. This ethic focuses exclusively on the persuasive means used to make the sender's message come across. The question is whether these rhetorical means mislead the receiver. In order to answer this question the ethical norm "fairness", defined from the viewpoint of the receiver, is proposed. It is shown how "fairness" makes us able to identify misleading means and to evaluate them on a common ethic ground.

scholarly journals Etika Komunikasi Visual Influencer Pariwisata

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 127
Author(s):  
Zakaria Lantang Sukirno
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Visual Communication ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Ethical Problem ◽  
Tourist Destination ◽  
Communication Ethics ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Tourism Promotion ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Visual Attraction

In tourism promotion, tourist destination visual attraction becomes a weapon to attract attention for tourism influencers through their social media. But visual ethical problem appears when photograph has been edited or manipulated by them. Thus, “what does visual communication ethic from influencer in tourism promotion like?”. This research based on concepts of utilitarian ethics, visual communication ethics, and tourism visual communication. For its methodology, this research uses positivistic paradigm, descriptive research, and utilitarian ethical evaluation method. Research findings obtained the quantification of harmful consequences and good consequences for tourism influencers photograph manipulation, and two alternative acts for tourism influencers visual communication ethics.

Health communication ethics and CDC quality-control guidelines for information

2003 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W McKenna ◽  
Terry F Pechacek ◽  
Donna F Stroup
Keyword(s):  
Quality Control ◽  
Health Communication ◽  
Communication Ethics

International Perspectives on Science Communication Ethics

1997 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 170-179
Author(s):  
Bruce V. Lewenstein
Keyword(s):  
Science Communication ◽  
Competing Values ◽  
Science Journalism ◽  
Communication Ethics ◽  
International Perspectives

Today, I want to use my own field of science communication, and especially science journalism, to explore some of these competing values. I want to give examples of the kinds of issues that can be raised for students who go overseas, and suggest the types of thinking and learning that these issues can stimulate. 

Automated argument adjudication to solve ethical problems in multi-agent environments

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 310-335
Author(s):  
Selmer Bringsjord ◽  
Naveen Sundar Govindarajulu ◽  
Michael Giancola
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Problem ◽  
Propositional Content ◽  
Ethical Principles ◽  
Artificial Agents ◽  
Artificial Agent ◽  
Ethical Problems ◽  
Multi Agent

Abstract Suppose an artificial agent a adj {a}_{\text{adj}} , as time unfolds, (i) receives from multiple artificial agents (which may, in turn, themselves have received from yet other such agents…) propositional content, and (ii) must solve an ethical problem on the basis of what it has received. How should a adj {a}_{\text{adj}} adjudicate what it has received in order to produce such a solution? We consider an environment infused with logicist artificial agents a 1 , a 2 , … , a n {a}_{1},{a}_{2},\ldots ,{a}_{n} that sense and report their findings to “adjudicator” agents who must solve ethical problems. (Many if not most of these agents may be robots.) In such an environment, inconsistency is a virtual guarantee: a adj {a}_{\text{adj}} may, for instance, receive a report from a 1 {a}_{1} that proposition ϕ \phi holds, then from a 2 {a}_{2} that ¬ ϕ \neg \phi holds, and then from a 3 {a}_{3} that neither ϕ \phi nor ¬ ϕ \neg \phi should be believed, but rather ψ \psi instead, at some level of likelihood. We further assume that agents receiving such incompatible reports will nonetheless sometimes simply need, before long, to make decisions on the basis of these reports, in order to try to solve ethical problems. We provide a solution to such a quandary: AI capable of adjudicating competing reports from subsidiary agents through time, and delivering to humans a rational, ethically correct (relative to underlying ethical principles) recommendation based upon such adjudication. To illuminate our solution, we anchor it to a particular scenario.

scholarly journals Issues concerning the science communication ethics of science and technology museums

2021 ◽  
pp. 209660832110262
Author(s):  
Xiang Li ◽  
Xuan Liu ◽  
Huiping Chu
Keyword(s):  
Science Communication ◽  
Ethical Issues ◽  
Science And Technology ◽  
Scientific Culture ◽  
Communication Ethics ◽  
Ethics Of Science ◽  
Contemporary Science

This paper reviews the acceleration of what is known as the ‘museumization’ process globally in the context of the New Museum Movement, and the particular mission of science and technology museums in representing scientific culture. It analyses the significance of science and technology museums in presenting critical concepts of contemporary science and technology, such as the controversies and uncertainties of science, as well as the diverse subjects that need to be involved in the process of representation, thereby underscoring the complexity of the ethical issues of science communication faced by science and technology museums.

scholarly journals Both Sides of the Story: Communication Ethics in Mediatized Worlds

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 328-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Eberwein ◽  
Colin Porlezza
Keyword(s):  
Communication Ethics
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document