scholarly journals COMPARISON OF AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS OF STEADY-STATE AND POTENTIALS EVOKED BY AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE IN INFANTS WITH SPECIFIC FREQUENCY HEARING LOSS

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pricila Sleifer ◽  
Luciane Pauletti ◽  
Cristina Krimberg ◽  
Bruna Teixeira ◽  
Isís Keppeler
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Specific Frequency

scholarly journals Comparison of auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response audiometry by evaluating the hearing thresholds obtained in children with different severity of hearing loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Azeem Aslam ◽  
Adeela Javed ◽  
Abdul Moiz
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
State Response ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
The Mean

Objectives: To compare the hearing thresholds obtained with auditory brainstem response (ABR) and auditory steady state response (ASSR) audiometry in children with hearing loss. Methods: Hearing thresholds were obtained by ABR and ASSR in children who presented with suspicion of deafness at Ear, nose & throat department of Al-Nafees Medical College Hospital Islamabad, between January to August 2018. The mean hearing thresholds obtained by two tests were compared within each category of severity of deafness. Time taken by both tests was also compared. Results: A total of 57 patients (114 ears) were included in the study. Among them 27 (47.4%) were male and 30 (52.6%) were female. The mean age of patients at presentation was 42 months (±30.9) with age range from one to 12 years. Mean hearing thresholds obtained by click ABR, chirp ABR, ASSR (1, 2, 4 kHz) & ASSR (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) was 56.25 (±27.61), 58.88 (±27.44), 58.03 (±21.26) & 56.35 (±22.86) respectively. Mean thresholds were comparable between click ABR & ASSR (1, 2, 4 kHz) and between chirp ABR & ASSR (0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz) in all degrees of hearing loss categories except in those patients with normal hearing thresholds. The mean time taken by clicks ABR, chirp ABR and ASSR were four minutes seven seconds, three minutes 15 seconds and 16 minutes and 7 seconds respectively. Conclusions: Hearing thresholds obtained by ABR and ASSR are comparable in all categories of severity of hearing loss. The time taken by ABR is less as compared to ASSR. How to cite this:Aslam MA, Javed A, Moiz A. Comparison of auditory brainstem response and auditory steady state response audiometry by evaluating the hearing thresholds obtained in children with different severity of hearing loss. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(2):---------.   doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.2.688 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of the Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) and Click Auditory Brainstem Evoked Response (ABR) Thresholds among Filipino Infants and Young Children

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Laurence Ian C. Tan ◽  
Maria Rina T. Reyes-Quintos ◽  
Maria Leah C. Tantoco ◽  
Charlotte M. Chiong
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Young Children ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Steady State Response ◽  
State Response ◽  
Auditory Steady State Response ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Infants And Young Children

Objective: To compare the results of auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) among infants and young children tested at the Ear Unit of a Tertiary General Hospital.   Methods: Design: Cross-sectional Study Setting: Tertiary General Hospital Population: Within-subject comparisons of click auditory brainstem response (click ABR) thresholds and auditory steady-state response (ASSR) thresholds among 55 infants and young children, 2 months to 35 months of age referred to the Ear Unit for electrophysiologic hearing assessment. Results: Click ABR showed strong positive correlation to all frequencies and averages of ASSR. Highest correlation was noted with the average of 1-4 kHz ASSR results with Pearson r = 0.89 (Spearman r=0.80), the average of 2-4 kHz had strong positive correlation r = 0.88 (0.79). Correlation was consistently strong through all ASSR frequencies (0.5 kHz at r=0.86 (0.74), 1 kHz at r=0.88 (0.78), 2 kHz at r=0. 87 (0.79), 4 kHz at r=0.85 (0.76)). Average differences of click ABR and ASSR thresholds were 8.2±12.9dB at 0.5 kHz, 8.6±12.6dB at 1 kHz, 5.3±11.8dB at 2 kHz and 7.8±13.4dB at 4 kHz. Among patients with no demonstrable waveforms by click ABR with maximal click stimulus, a large percentage presented with ASSR thresholds. Of these, 80.5% (33 of 41) had measurable results at 0.5 kHz with an average of 107.3±11.1dB, 85.4% (35 of 41) at 1 kHz with an average of 110.5±11.8dB, 73.2% (30 of 41) at 2 kHz with an average of 111.2±11.1dB and 63.4% (26 of 41) at 4 kHz with and average of 112.2±8.21dB. Auditory steady-state response results were comparable to auditory brainstem response results in normal to severe hearing loss, and provided additional information necessary for complete audiologic assessment especially among patients with severe to profound hearing loss wherein click ABR showed no responses. Up to 85.4% of patients that would have been noted to have no waveforms by click ABR still demonstrated measurable thresholds by ASSR   Conclusion: Our study suggests that ASSR may be the best available tool for assessing children with severe to profound hearing loss, and is a comparably effective tool in overall hearing assessment for patients requiring electrophysiological testing. The advantages of ASSR over click ABR include: 1) detection of frequency-specific thresholds and; 2) the detection of hearing loss thresholds beyond the limits of click ABR.     Key words: Auditory Steady-State Response, ASSR, Auditory Brainstem-Evoked Response, ABR, Hearing Thresholds, Electrophysiologic Testing  

scholarly journals Auditory Brainstem Response to Paired Click Stimulation as an Indicator of Peripheral Synaptic Health in Noise-Induced Cochlear Synaptopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Hun Lee ◽  
Min Young Lee ◽  
Ji Eun Choi ◽  
Jae Yun Jung
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Hair Cells ◽  
Temporal Processing ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potentials ◽  
Noise Exposure ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Ribbon Synapses ◽  
Brainstem Response

IntroductionA defect in the cochlear afferent synapse between the inner hair cells and spiral ganglion neurons, after noise exposure, without changes in the hearing threshold has been reported. Animal studies on auditory evoked potentials demonstrated changes in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) measurements of peak I amplitude and the loss of synapses, which affect the temporal resolution of complex sounds. Human studies of auditory evoked potential have reported ambiguous results regarding the relationship between peak I amplitude and noise exposure. Paired click stimuli have been used to investigate the temporal processing abilities of humans and animals. In this study, we investigated the utility of measuring auditory evoked potentials in response to paired click stimuli to assess the temporal processing function of ribbon synapses in noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy.Materials and MethodsTwenty-two Sprague Dawley rats were used in this study, and synaptopathy was induced by narrow-band noise exposure (16 kHz with 1 kHz bandwidth, 105 dB sound pressure level for 2 h). ABRs to tone and paired click stimuli were measured before and 1, 3, 7, and 14 days after noise exposure. For histological analyses, hair cells and ribbon synapses were immunostained and the synapses quantified. The relationships among ABR peak I amplitude, number of synapses, and ABR to paired click stimuli were examined.ResultsOur results showed that ABR thresholds increase 1 day after noise exposure but fully recover to baseline levels after 14 days. Further, we demonstrated test frequency-dependent decreases in peak I amplitude and the number of synapses after noise exposure. These decreases were statistically significant at frequencies of 16 and 32 kHz. However, the ABR recovery threshold to paired click stimuli increased, which represent deterioration in the ability of temporal auditory processing. Our results indicate that the ABR recovery threshold is highly correlated with ABR peak I amplitude after noise exposure. We also established a direct correlation between the ABR recovery threshold and histological findings.ConclusionThe result from this study suggests that in animal studies, the ABR to paired click stimuli along with peak I amplitude has potential as an assessment tool for hidden hearing loss.

Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Response and Auditory Brainstem Response Thresholds in Children

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (05) ◽  
pp. 227-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathy R. Vander Werff ◽  
Carolyn J. Brown ◽  
Barbara A. Gienapp ◽  
Kelly M. Schmidt Clay
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Auditory Brainstem Response ◽  
Auditory Brainstem ◽  
Strong Correlations ◽  
University Of Iowa ◽  
Brainstem Response ◽  
Steady State Responses ◽  
Children With Hearing Loss ◽  
Auditory Steady State Responses ◽  
The University

Recently, auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) have been proposed as an alternative to the auditory brainstem response (ABR) for threshold estimation. The goal of this study was to investigate the degree to which ASSR thresholds correlate with ABR thresholds for a group of sedated children with a range of hearing losses. Thirty-two children from the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics ranging in age from 2 months to 3 years and presenting with a range of ABR thresholds participated. Strong correlations were found between the 2000-Hz ASSR thresholds and click ABR thresholds (r = .96), the average of the 2000- and 4000-Hz ASSR thresholds and click ABR thresholds (r = .97), and the 500-Hz ASSR and 500-Hz toneburst ABR thresholds (r = .86). Additionally, it was possible to measure ASSR thresholds for several children with hearing loss that was great enough to result in no ABR at the limits of the equipment. The results of this study indicate that the ASSR may provide a reasonable alternative to the ABR for estimating audiometric thresholds in very young children.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document