Colonial hesitation, appropriation, and citation: Qāsim Amīn, empire, and saying ‘no’

Author(s):  
Murad Idris

This chapter examines the complex and ambiguous thought of Egyptian jurist Qāsim Amīn. Amīn’s work is fraught with issues of gender and freedom, which are occasioned by ideas about the sociological conditions of modernity that include the premise of natural selection in the competition between societies. Amīn worried that Egypt had made itself unable to compete fully in the evolutionary conflict between societies and linked the competition to normative questions about individual freedom and, especially, the position of women in society. At the same time, Amīn also sought to counter the universalist claims of certain interpreters and critics of Islam. Thus he sought to navigate unsteady terrain in describing the meaning of a progressive society without simply reproducing European ideas. Idris’s chapter demonstrates the difficulty of writing in ambiguous and profoundly asymmetric colonial circumstances. Seeking both to defend and reform Islamic societies – and both admiring and fearing colonial power – Amīn wrote divergent texts for different audiences: in French, he made defensive arguments; in Arabic, reformist. The conclusion of the chapter powerfully illustrates the ways in which the strategy would misfire: European commentators would in the end deploy Amīn’s Arabic language work as support for further imperial entrenchment.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunal Bhutani ◽  
Katherine Stansifer ◽  
Simina Ticau ◽  
Lazar Bojic ◽  
Chloe Villani ◽  
...  

1AbstractMendel’s first law dictates that alleles segregate randomly during meiosis and are distributed to offspring with equal frequency, requiring sperm to be functionally independent of their genetic payload. Developing mammalian spermatids have been thought to accomplish this by freely sharing RNA from virtually all genes through cytoplasmic bridges, equalizing allelic gene expression across different genotypes. Applying single cell RNA sequencing to developing spermatids, we identify a large class of mammalian genes whose allelic expression ratio is informative of the haploid genotype, which we call genoinformative markers (GIMs). 29% of spermatid-expressed genes in mice and 47% in non-human primates are not uniformly shared, and instead show a confident allelic expression bias of at least 2-fold towards the haploid genotype. This property of GIMs was significantly conserved between individuals and between rodents and primates. Consistent with the interpretation of specific RNA localization resulting in incomplete sharing through cytoplasmic bridges, we observe a strong depletion of GIM transcripts from chromatoid bodies, structures involved in shuttling RNA across cytoplasmic bridges, and an enrichment for 3’ UTR motifs involved in RNA localization. If GIMs are translated and functional in the context of fertility, they would be able to violate Mendel’s first law, leading to selective sweeps through a population. Indeed, we show that GIMs are enriched for signatures of positive selection, accounting for dozens of recent mouse, human, and primate selective sweeps. Intense selection at the sperm level risks evolutionary conflict between germline and somatic function, and GIMs show evidence of avoiding this conflict by exhibiting more testis-specific gene expression, paralogs, and isoforms than expression-matched control genes. The widespread existence of GIMs suggests that selective forces acting at the level of individual mammalian sperm are much more frequent than commonly believed.2Author’s summaryMendel’s first law dictates that alleles are distributed to offspring with equal frequency, requiring sperm carrying different genetics to be functionally equivalent. Despite a small number of known exceptions to this, it is widely believed that sharing of gene products through cytoplasmic bridges erases virtually all differences between haploid sperm. Here, we show that a large class of mammalian genes are not completely shared across these bridges, therefore causing sperm phenotype to correspond partly to haploid genotype. We term these genes “genoinformative markers” (GIMs) and show that their identity tends to be conserved from rodents to primates. Because some GIMs can link sperm genotype to function, they can be thought of as selfish genetic elements which lead to natural selection between sperm rather than between organisms, a violation of Mendel’s first law. We find evidence of this biased inheritance, showing that GIMs are strongly enriched for selective sweeps that spread alleles through mouse and human populations. For genes expressed both in sperm and in somatic tissues, this can cause a conflict because optimizing gene function for sperm may be detrimental to its other functions. We show that there is evolutionary pressure to avoid this conflict, as GIMs are strongly enriched for testis-specific gene expression, testis-specific paralogs, and testis-specific isoforms. Therefore, GIMs and sperm-level natural selection may provide an elegant explanation for the peculiarity of testis gene expression patterns, which are an extreme outlier relative to all other tissues.


2014 ◽  
Vol 369 (1642) ◽  
pp. 20130423 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Queller

Multiple organisms can sometimes affect a common phenotype. For example, the portion of a leaf eaten by an insect is a joint phenotype of the plant and insect and the amount of food obtained by an offspring can be a joint trait with its mother. Here, I describe the evolution of joint phenotypes in quantitative genetic terms. A joint phenotype for multiple species evolves as the sum of additive genetic variances in each species, weighted by the selection on each species. Selective conflict between the interactants occurs when selection takes opposite signs on the joint phenotype. The mean fitness of a population changes not just through its own genetic variance but also through the genetic variance for its fitness that resides in other species, an update of Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection. Some similar results, using inclusive fitness, apply to within-species interactions. The models provide a framework for understanding evolutionary conflicts at all levels.


2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
pp. 3472-3487
Author(s):  
Natalia V. Rakhlin ◽  
Nan Li ◽  
Abdullah Aljughaiman ◽  
Elena L. Grigorenko

Purpose We examined indices of narrative microstructure as metrics of language development and impairment in Arabic-speaking children. We examined their age sensitivity, correlations with standardized measures, and ability to differentiate children with average language and language impairment. Method We collected story narratives from 177 children (54.2% boys) between 3.08 and 10.92 years old ( M = 6.25, SD = 1.67) divided into six age bands. Each child also received standardized measures of spoken language (Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary, Sentence Imitation, and Pseudoword Repetition). Several narrative indices of microstructure were examined in each age band. Children were divided into (suspected) developmental language disorder and typical language groups using the standardized test scores and compared on the narrative indicators. Sensitivity and specificity of the narrative indicators that showed group differences were calculated. Results The measures that showed age sensitivity included subject omission error rate, number of object clitics, correct use of subject–verb agreement, and mean length of utterance in words. The developmental language disorder group scored higher on subject omission errors (Cohen's d = 0.55) and lower on correct use of subject–verb agreement (Cohen's d = 0.48) than the typical language group. The threshold for impaired performance with the highest combination of specificity and sensitivity was 35th percentile. Conclusions Several indices of narrative microstructure appear to be valid metrics for documenting language development in children acquiring Gulf Arabic. Subject omission errors and correct use of subject–verb agreement differentiate children with typical and atypical levels of language development.


1979 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
David Chiszar ◽  
Karlana Carpen

1998 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 263-264
Author(s):  
Joseph F. Rychlak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document