scholarly journals Peer Review #1 of "Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste (v0.1)"

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Municipal Solid Waste ◽  
Solid Waste ◽  
Peer Review ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
High Moisture ◽  
Two Stage

scholarly journals Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for biogas production from high moisture municipal solid waste

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9693
Author(s):  
Wattananarong Markphan ◽  
Chonticha Mamimin ◽  
Wantanasak Suksong ◽  
Poonsuk Prasertsan ◽  
Sompong O-Thong
Keyword(s):  
Fly Ash ◽  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Energy Recovery ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Organic Loading ◽  
High Moisture ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Ph Adjustment

Background Anaerobic digestion (AD) is a suitable process for treating high moisture MSW with biogas and biofertilizer production. However, the low stability of AD performance and low methane production results from high moisture MSW due to the fast acidify of carbohydrate fermentation. The effects of organic loading and incineration fly ash addition as a pH adjustment on methane production from high moisture MSW in the single-stage AD and two-stage AD processes were investigated. Results Suitable initial organic loading of the single-stage AD process was 17 gVS L−1 at incineration fly ash (IFA) addition of 0.5% with methane yield of 287 mL CH4 g−1 VS. Suitable initial organic loading of the two-stage AD process was 43 gVS L−1 at IFA addition of 1% with hydrogen and methane yield of 47.4 ml H2 g−1 VS and 363 mL CH4 g−1 VS, respectively. The highest hydrogen and methane production of 8.7 m3 H2 ton−1 of high moisture MSW and 66.6 m3 CH4 ton−1 of high moisture MSW was achieved at organic loading of 43 gVS L−1 at IFA addition of 1% by two-stage AD process. Biogas production by the two-stage AD process enabled 18.5% higher energy recovery than single-stage AD. The 1% addition of IFA into high moisture MSW was useful for controlling pH of the two-stage AD process with enhanced biogas production between 87–92% when compared to without IFA addition. Electricity production and energy recovery from MSW using the coupled incineration with biogas production by two-stage AD process were 9,874 MJ ton−1 MSW and 89%, respectively. Conclusions The two-stage AD process with IFA addition for pH adjustment could improve biogas production from high moisture MSW, as well as reduce lag phase and enhance biodegradability efficiency. The coupled incineration process with biogas production using the two-stage AD process was suitable for the management of MSW with low area requirement, low greenhouse gas emissions, and high energy recovery.

Strategies for the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: an overview

2006 ◽  
Vol 53 (8) ◽  
pp. 7-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hartmann ◽  
B.K. Ahring
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Municipal Solid Waste ◽  
Solid Waste ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
C:N Ratio ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
High Solids ◽  
Organic Fraction ◽  
Multi Stage

Different process strategies for anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) are reviewed weighing high-solids versus low-solids, mesophilic versus thermophilic and single-stage versus multi-stage processes. The influence of different waste characteristics such as composition of biodegradable fractions, C:N ratio and particle size is described. Generally, source sorting of OFMSW and a high content of food waste leads to higher biogas yields than the use of mechanically sorted OFMSW. Thermophilic processes are more efficient than mesophilic processes in terms of higher biogas yields at different organic loading rates (OLR). Highest biogas yields are achieved by means of wet thermophilic processes at OLRs lower than 6 kg-VS·m−3 d−1. High-solids processes appear to be relatively more efficient when OLRs higher than 6 kg-VS·m−3 d−1 are applied. Multi-stage systems show in some investigations a higher reduction of recalcitrant organic matter compared to single-stage systems, but they are seldom applied in full-scale. An extended cost-benefit calculation shows that the highest overall benefit of the process is achieved at an OLR that is lower and a hydraulic retention time (HRT) that is longer than those values of OLR and HRT, at which the highest biogas production is achieved.

scholarly journals Two-stage granular sludge partial nitritation/anammox process for the treatment of digestate from the anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste

2019 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 36-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tommaso Lotti ◽  
Ottavia Burzi ◽  
Davide Scaglione ◽  
Carlos Antonio Ramos ◽  
Elena Ficara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Municipal Solid Waste ◽  
Solid Waste ◽  
Granular Sludge ◽  
Organic Fraction ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Partial Nitritation ◽  
Anammox Process

scholarly journals Comparative assessment of single-stage and two-stage anaerobic digestion for the treatment of thin stillage

2012 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noha Nasr ◽  
Elsayed Elbeshbishy ◽  
Hisham Hafez ◽  
George Nakhla ◽  
M. Hesham El Naggar
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Comparative Assessment ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Thin Stillage ◽  
Two Stage
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document