scholarly journals Safe and sensible baseline correction of pupil-size data

Author(s):  
Sebastiaan Mathôt ◽  
Jasper Fabius ◽  
Elle van Heusden ◽  
Stefan Van der Stigchel

Measurement of pupil size (pupillometry) has recently gained renewed interest from psychologists, but there is little agreement on how pupil-size data is best analyzed. Here we focus on one aspect of pupillometric analyses: baseline correction, that is, analyzing changes in pupil size relative to a baseline period. Baseline correction is useful in experiments that investigate the effect of some experimental manipulation on pupil size. In such experiments, baseline correction improves statistical power by taking into account random fluctuations in pupil size over time. However, we show that baseline correction can also distort data if unrealistically small pupil sizes are recorded during the baseline period, which can easily occur due to eye blinks, data loss, or other distortions. Divisive baseline correction (corrected pupil size = pupil size / baseline) is affected more strongly by such distortions than subtractive baseline correction (corrected pupil size = pupil size - baseline). We make four recommendations for safe and sensible baseline correction of pupil-size data: 1) use subtractive baseline correction; 2) visually compare your corrected and uncorrected data; 3) be wary of pupil-size effects that emerge faster than the latency of the pupillary response allows (within ±220 ms after the manipulation that induces the effect); and 4) remove trials on which baseline pupil size is unrealistically small (indicative of blinks and other distortions).

Author(s):  
Sebastiaan Mathôt ◽  
Jasper Fabius ◽  
Elle van Heusden ◽  
Stefan Van der Stigchel

Measurement of pupil size (pupillometry) has recently gained renewed interest from psychologists, but there is little agreement on how pupil-size data is best analyzed. Here we focus on one aspect of pupillometric analyses: baseline correction, that is, analyzing changes in pupil size relative to a baseline period. Baseline correction is useful in experiments that investigate the effect of some experimental manipulation on pupil size. In such experiments, baseline correction improves statistical power by taking into account random fluctuations in pupil size over time. However, we show that baseline correction can also distort data if unrealistically small pupil sizes are recorded during the baseline period, which can easily occur due to eye blinks, data loss, or other distortions. Divisive baseline correction (corrected pupil size = pupil size / baseline) is affected more strongly by such distortions than subtractive baseline correction (corrected pupil size = pupil size - baseline). We make four recommendations for safe and sensible baseline correction of pupil-size data: 1) use subtractive baseline correction; 2) visually compare your corrected and uncorrected data; 3) be wary of pupil-size effects that emerge faster than the latency of the pupillary response allows (within ±220 ms after the manipulation that induces the effect); and 4) remove trials on which baseline pupil size is unrealistically small (indicative of blinks and other distortions).


Author(s):  
Joseph Coyne ◽  
Ciara Sibley

Eye tracking technologies are being utilized at increasing rates within industry and research due to the very recent availability of low cost systems. This paper presents results from a study assessing two eye tracking systems, Gazepoint GP3 and Eye Tribe, both of which are available for under $500 and provide streaming gaze and pupil size data. The emphasis of this research was in evaluating the ability of these eye trackers to identify changes in pupil size which occur as a function of variations in lighting conditions as well as those associated with workload. Ten volunteers participated in an experiment in which a digit span task was employed to manipulate workload as user’s fixated on a monitor which varied in background luminance (black, gray and white). Results revealed that both systems were able to significantly differentiate pupil size differences in high and low workload trials and changes due to the monitor’s luminance. These findings are exceedingly promising for human factors researchers, as they open up the opportunity to augment studies with non-obtrusive, streaming measures of mental workload with technologies available for as little as $100.


2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiaan Mathôt ◽  
Jasper Fabius ◽  
Elle Van Heusden ◽  
Stefan Van der Stigchel

1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (3-2) ◽  
pp. 1351-1367
Author(s):  
Robert S. Sturgeon ◽  
Leslie M. Cooper ◽  
Robert J. Howell

15 highly aroused snake phobics individually constructed fear hierarchies by selecting colored photographs of snakes. Subjects either imagined fear scenes based on their photographs or were exposed to duplicate projected slides during desensitization. Pupillary responses of the Slide Group were also recorded before, during, and after desensitization. Fear of snakes was significantly reduced for both groups within five or fewer desensitization sessions. Changes in pupil size of the Slide Group appear to reflect arousal of fear as well as reduction of fear after treatment. Current technology makes pupillary response a viable psychophysiological measure of fear.


1983 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 1212-1223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall M. Peterman ◽  
Richard D. Routledge

Large-scale experimental manipulation of juvenile salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) abundance can provide a test of the hypothesis of linearity in the smolt-to-adult abundance relation. However, not all manipulations will be equally informative owing to large variability in marine survival. We use Monte Carlo simulation and an analytical approximation to calculate for Oregon coho salmon (O. kisutch) the statistical power of the test involving different controlled smolt abundances and durations of experiments. One recently proposed experimental release of 48 million smolts for each of 3 yr has a relatively low power and, as a consequence, is unlikely to show clearly whether the smolt-to-adult relationship is linear. The number of smolts required for a powerful test of the hypothesis of linearity is closer to the 88 million suggested in another proposal. To prevent confounding of interpretation of results, all other human sources of variability in fish should be minimized by establishing standardized rearing and release procedures during the experiment. In addition, appropriate preexperiment data on coho food, predators, and competitors will increase effectiveness of experiments by providing information on mechanisms of change in marine survival.


2015 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 37-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Van Wynsberge ◽  
Serge Andréfouët ◽  
Nabila Gaertner-Mazouni ◽  
Georges Remoissenet

1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1351-1367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Sturgeon ◽  
Leslie M. Cooper ◽  
Robert J. Howell

15 highly aroused snake phobics individually constructed fear hierarchies by selecting colored photographs of snakes. Subjects either imagined fear scenes based on their photographs or were exposed to duplicate projected slides during desensitization. Pupillary responses of the Slide Group were also recorded before, during, and after desensitization. Fear of snakes was significantly reduced for both groups within five or fewer desensitization sessions. Changes in pupil size of the Slide Group appear to reflect arousal of fear as well as reduction of fear after treatment. Current technology makes pupillary response a viable psychophysiological measure of fear.


1970 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 587-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Polt

2 groups of 7 Ss each were presented with 2 series of 3 multiplication problems which served as the problem-solving task. On the first series of problems Ss were run under identical conditions to establish response baselines between groups. On the second series of problems the experimental group was threatened with shock for an incorrect answer. Comparisons were made on response latency, correct responses, absolute pupil size, and pupillary dilation during problem solving. The only significant difference between groups was the degree of pupillary dilation while solving the second series of problems. The results are discussed within the context of the coping process under the threat of stress and are related to previous research on the pupillary response as a measure of mental activity.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Léon Franzen ◽  
Amanda Cabugao ◽  
Bianca Grohmann ◽  
Aaron Paul Johnson

Cognitive psychology has a long history of using physiological measures, such as pupillometry. However, their susceptibility to confounds introduced by stimulus properties, such as colour and luminance, has limited their application. Pupil size measurements, in particular, require sophisticated experimental designs to dissociate relatively small changes in pupil diameter due to cognitive responses from larger ones elicited by changes in stimulus properties or the experimental environment. Here, we use an innovative pupillometry paradigm that adapts the pupil to stimulus properties during the baseline period without revealing stimulus meaning or context. We demonstrate its robustness in the context of pupillary responses to branded product familiarity. Results show larger average and peak pupil dilation for passively viewed familiar product images during an early and an extended later temporal component across participants (starting around 500 and 1400 ms post-stimulus onset, respectively). These amplitude differences are present for almost all participants at the single-participant level, and vary slightly by product category. However, amplitude differences were absent during the baseline period. These findings demonstrate that involuntary pupil size measurements combined with this paradigm are successful in dissociating cognitive effects associated with familiarity from physical stimulus confounds.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 2232-2255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Geller ◽  
Matthew B. Winn ◽  
Tristian Mahr ◽  
Daniel Mirman
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document