scholarly journals Can Single Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy Replace the Traditional Three Port Laparoscopic Approach in Coming Future: A Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manoj Chand ◽  
Ji Zhen Ling
2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jong Won Kim ◽  
Jun Seok Park ◽  
In Taik Chang ◽  
Yoo Shin Choi ◽  
Hyung Jun Song ◽  
...  

Surgery Today ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 542-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siwo Ernest Amos ◽  
Wu Shuo-Dong ◽  
Ying Fan ◽  
Yu Tian ◽  
Chun-Chih Chen

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Harrell ◽  
Amy E. Lincourt ◽  
Yuri W. Novitsky ◽  
Michael J. Rosen ◽  
Timothy S. Kuwada ◽  
...  

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has gained in popularity in recent years. The number of elderly patients undergoing appendectomy has increased as that segment of the population has increased in number; however, the utility and benefits of LA in the elderly population are not well established. We hypothesized that LA in the elderly has distinctive advantages in perioperative outcomes over open appendectomy (OA). We queried the 1997 to 2003 North Carolina Hospital Association Patient Data System for all patients with the primary ICD-9 procedure code for OA and LA. Patients ≥65 years of age (elderly) were identified and reviewed. Outcomes including length of stay (LOS), charges, complications, discharge location, and mortality were compared between the groups. There were 29,244 appendectomies performed in adult patients (>18 years old) with 2,722 of these in the elderly. The annual percentage of LA performed in the elderly increased from 1997 to 2003 (11.9–26.9%, P < 0.0001). When compared with OA, elderly patients undergoing LA had a shorter LOS (4.6 vs 7.3 days, P = 0.0001), a higher rate of discharge to home (91.4 vs 78.9%, P = 0.0001) as opposed to a step-down facility, fewer complications (13.0 vs 22.4%, P = 0.0001), and a lower mortality rate (0.4 vs 2.1%, P = 0.007). When LA was compared with OA in elderly patients with perforated appendicitis, LA resulted in a shorter LOS (6.8 vs 9.0 days, P = 0.0001), a higher rate of discharge to home (86.6 vs 70.9%, P = 0.0001), but equivalent total charges ($22,334 vs $23,855, P = 0.93) and mortality (1.0 vs 2.98%, P = 0.10). When elderly patients that underwent LA were compared with adult patients (18–64 years old), they had higher total charges ($16,670 vs $11,160, P = 0.0001) but equivalent mortality (0.37 vs 0.15%, P = 0.20). The use of laparoscopy in the elderly has significantly increased in recent years. In general, the safety and efficacy of LA is demonstrated by a reduction in mortality, complications, and LOS when compared with OA. The laparoscopic approach to the perforated appendix in the elderly patient has advantages over OA in terms of decreased LOS and a higher rate of discharge to home as opposed to rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, or skilled nursing care. When compared with all younger adults, the laparoscopic approach in the elderly was associated with equal mortality rates even though hospitalization charges were higher. Laparoscopy may be the preferred approach in elderly patients who require appendectomy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 ◽  
pp. 157-160
Author(s):  
N. den Dekker ◽  
A.A.J. Grüter ◽  
S.E. van Oostendorp ◽  
B.M. Zonderhuis ◽  
J.B. Tuynman

2013 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. e49-e59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adolfo Pisanu ◽  
Giulia Porceddu ◽  
Isabella Reccia ◽  
Alessandra Saba ◽  
Alessandro Uccheddu

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 509-511
Author(s):  
Alan A. Saber ◽  
Tarek H. El-Ghazaly

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery is an emerging minimally invasive approach. When using the single-incision laparoscopic surgery approach, the surgeon operates almost exclusively through a single point of entry, usually the patient's umbilicus. This approach is steadily gaining popularity among minimally invasive surgeons, as it combines the cosmetic advantage of Natural Orifice Translumenal Surgery with the technical familiarity of conventional laparoscopic surgery. In this report, we describe our implementation of the single-incision laparoscopic approach to perform an unroofing of a posttraumatic splenic cyst; in this case, the entire procedure is performed through a 2-cm intraumbilical incision.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1306-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Esparaz ◽  
Paul M. Jeziorczak ◽  
Alyssa R. Mowrer ◽  
Shawn R. Chakraborty ◽  
Ryan T. Nierstedt ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Beom-Jin Kim ◽  
Jong Won Kim ◽  
Yoo Shin Choi ◽  
Yong Gum Park ◽  
Beom Gyu Kim ◽  
...  

Background. Technical difficulties and pain from large wounds have prevented the widespread use of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our newly developed needle grasper (Endo Relief)-assisted SILA (NASILA). Methods. For NASILA, about a 12-mm umbilical incision was made, and a glove port was introduced. A needle grasper was then introduced through a 2.5-mm wound on the suprapubic area. For SILA, a 2.5-cm transumbilical wound was made. The medical records of patients who underwent SILA or NASILA from June 2017 to September 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Operative and short-term postoperative outcomes and results of telephone interviews for scars were compared. Results. A total of 49 patients in the SILA group (male: 40.8%) and 12 in the NASILA group (male: 50.0%) were included. Appendicitis status (not perforated:perforated without abscess:perforated with abscess) was significantly different between the 2 groups (SILA vs NASILA, 30:18:1 vs 4:6:2, P = .027). Additional trocars were inserted in 9 patients (18.4%) of the SILA group. The operative time was significantly shorter (43.3 ± 33.6 vs 54.1 ± 15.6 minutes, P = .012), and the highest numerical pain intensity score during the first 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower (2.4 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 0.9, P = .038) in the NASILA group than in the SILA group. Hospital stay, postoperative complications, and complaint of scar were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Conclusions. NASILA was not inferior to SILA regarding cosmetic results. Operative convenience is higher in NASILA than in SILA, and the smaller surgical wound in NASILA minimizes postoperative pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document