Advantages of Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Elderly

2006 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew G. Harrell ◽  
Amy E. Lincourt ◽  
Yuri W. Novitsky ◽  
Michael J. Rosen ◽  
Timothy S. Kuwada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Skilled Nursing ◽  
Total Charges

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has gained in popularity in recent years. The number of elderly patients undergoing appendectomy has increased as that segment of the population has increased in number; however, the utility and benefits of LA in the elderly population are not well established. We hypothesized that LA in the elderly has distinctive advantages in perioperative outcomes over open appendectomy (OA). We queried the 1997 to 2003 North Carolina Hospital Association Patient Data System for all patients with the primary ICD-9 procedure code for OA and LA. Patients ≥65 years of age (elderly) were identified and reviewed. Outcomes including length of stay (LOS), charges, complications, discharge location, and mortality were compared between the groups. There were 29,244 appendectomies performed in adult patients (>18 years old) with 2,722 of these in the elderly. The annual percentage of LA performed in the elderly increased from 1997 to 2003 (11.9–26.9%, P < 0.0001). When compared with OA, elderly patients undergoing LA had a shorter LOS (4.6 vs 7.3 days, P = 0.0001), a higher rate of discharge to home (91.4 vs 78.9%, P = 0.0001) as opposed to a step-down facility, fewer complications (13.0 vs 22.4%, P = 0.0001), and a lower mortality rate (0.4 vs 2.1%, P = 0.007). When LA was compared with OA in elderly patients with perforated appendicitis, LA resulted in a shorter LOS (6.8 vs 9.0 days, P = 0.0001), a higher rate of discharge to home (86.6 vs 70.9%, P = 0.0001), but equivalent total charges ($22,334 vs $23,855, P = 0.93) and mortality (1.0 vs 2.98%, P = 0.10). When elderly patients that underwent LA were compared with adult patients (18–64 years old), they had higher total charges ($16,670 vs $11,160, P = 0.0001) but equivalent mortality (0.37 vs 0.15%, P = 0.20). The use of laparoscopy in the elderly has significantly increased in recent years. In general, the safety and efficacy of LA is demonstrated by a reduction in mortality, complications, and LOS when compared with OA. The laparoscopic approach to the perforated appendix in the elderly patient has advantages over OA in terms of decreased LOS and a higher rate of discharge to home as opposed to rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, or skilled nursing care. When compared with all younger adults, the laparoscopic approach in the elderly was associated with equal mortality rates even though hospitalization charges were higher. Laparoscopy may be the preferred approach in elderly patients who require appendectomy.

Association of Wound Infection with Various Surgical Technique Applied for Appendectomy in Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2163-2165
Author(s):  
Muhammad Armughan ◽  
Imran Sadiq ◽  
Shafqat Mukhtar ◽  
Hafiz Ahmad Altaf
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Wound Infections ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Perforated Appendix

Background: Perforated appendix in diabetic as well as hypertensive patients is associated with elevated risks of postoperative infectious complications such as wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess. Objective: To identify better appendectomy procedure for diabetic and hypertensive patients. Study Design: Randomized Controlled Trial Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery, Unit l, Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur from 10th October 2020 to 9th April 2021. Methodology: Ninety eight patients meeting the criteria of perforated appendix were divided in two groups; one group consisted of 49 patients who were managed by open surgical procedure. Second group was consisted of 49 patients who were managed by laparoscopic surgical procedure. Patient outcomes in-terms of wound infections, operative time and duration of surgery was assessed. Results: Mean age of patients was 25.49±6.03 years. There were 17 hypertensive while 15 diabetic patients. Wound infection was seen in 21% and 28% open surgery diabetic and hypertensive patients respectively in comparison to 10%and 8% in laparoscopic appendectomy diabetic and hypertensive patients respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is associated with significantly lower rates of post-operative wound infections and shorter hospital stay in comparison to open appendectomy in diabetic and hypertensive patients of perforated appendicitis. Key Words: Perforated appendix, laparoscopic, open appendectomy

scholarly journals Comparison of Outcomes Between McKeown and Sweet Esophagectomy in the Elderly Patients for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 107327482090470
Author(s):  
Dongni Chen ◽  
Yihuai Hu ◽  
Youfang Chen ◽  
Jia Hu ◽  
Zhesheng Wen
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Propensity Score ◽  
Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Term Survival

The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative outcomes and long-term survival rates of the McKeown and Sweet procedures in patients with esophageal cancer younger than 70 years or older than 70 years. A total of 1432 consecutive patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who received surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2009 to October 2012 were analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to balance the clinical characteristics of the patients who underwent different surgical approaches, and 275 and 71 paired cases were matched among those younger and older than 70 years, respectively. The prognosis and postoperative outcomes were compared between the McKeown and the Sweet esophagectomy. For patients younger than 70 years, those who underwent the McKeown procedure had better overall survival (OS) than those in the Sweet group (log rank = 4.467; P = .035). However, no significant difference in disease-free survival and OS was observed between two approaches for the elderly patients (log rank = 1.562; P = .211 and log rank = 0.668; P = .414, respectively). Cox regression analysis revealed that McKeown approach was a positive prognostic factor compared to the Sweet approach for patients younger than 70 years in univariable analysis (HR = 0.790; 95% CI, 0.625-0.997; P = .047), whereas the surgical approach was not significantly related to the prognosis in the elderly patients. For patients older than 70 years, the occurrence of anastomotic fistula increased in those who underwent the McKeown procedure (23.9% vs 11.3%, P = .038, for the McKeown and Sweet esophagectomy, respectively). The McKeown approach increases the OS in younger patients with ESCC. However, for patients older than 70 years, the Sweet approach was proven to be an effective therapy, given the better perioperative outcomes and similar long-term survival compared with patients in the McKeown group.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Appendectomy Trends and Outcomes in the United States: Data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004–2011

2014 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 1074-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Masoomi ◽  
Ninh T. Nguyen ◽  
Matthew O. Dolich ◽  
Steven Mills ◽  
Joseph C. Carmichael ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Conversion Rate ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is becoming the standard procedure of choice for appendicitis. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and trends of LA for acute appendicitis in the United States and to compare outcomes of LA with open appendectomy (OA). Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, we examined patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis from 2004 to 2011. A total of 2,593,786 patients underwent appendectomy during this period. Overall, the rate of LA was 60.5 per cent (children: 58.1%; adults: 63%; elderly: 48.7%). LA rate significantly increased from 43.3 per cent in 2004 to 75 per cent in 2011. LA use increased 66 per cent in nonperforated appendicitis versus 100 per cent increase in LA use for perforated appendicitis. The LA rate increased in all age groups. The increased LA use was more significant in male patients (84%) compared with female patients (62%). The overall conversion rate of LA to OA was 6.3 per cent. Compared with OA, LA had a significantly lower complication rate, a lower mortality rate, a shorter mean hospital stay, and lower mean total hospital charges in both nonperforated and perforated appendices. LA has become an established procedure for appendectomy in nonperforated and perforated appendicitis in all rates exceeding OA. Conversion rate is relatively low (6.3%).

scholarly journals Clinical evolution of adult, elderly and very elderly patients admitted in Intensive Care Units

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1344-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verônica Cunha Rodrigues de Oliveira ◽  
Lilia de Souza Nogueira ◽  
Rafaela Andolhe ◽  
Katia Grillo Padilha ◽  
Regina Marcia Cardoso de Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Simplified Acute Physiology Score ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Very Elderly

This study compared clinical outcomes among adult, elderly and very elderly patients admitted to Intensive Care Units (ICUs) located in São Paulo, Brazil. This retrospective, longitudinal and comparative study included 279 adult (≥18 and <60 years), 216 elderly (≥60 and <80 years) and 105 very elderly (≥80 years) patients. Adult patients differed from other groups regarding the unit to which they were referred and severity, according to the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II. Adults were most frequently sent to hospitalization wards; elderly and very elderly patients who survived hospitalization in critical units showed sharper improvement before discharge. There were differences in relation to mortality between adult and elderly patients, with a higher rate in the elderly group; however, the mortality rate of very elderly and adult patients was similar. In general, the results indicated that older age was not associated with undesirable outcomes in ICUs.

Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1051-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Yagmurlu ◽  
A. Vernon ◽  
D. C. Barnhart ◽  
K. E. Georgeson ◽  
C. M. Harmon
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis

scholarly journals Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy and the Developing World

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tika Ram Bhandari ◽  
Sudha Shahi ◽  
Sarita Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Resource Poor Setting ◽  
Negative Appendectomy

Background. Acute appendicitis is the commonest nonobstetric surgical emergency during pregnancy. The aim of the study was to compare perioperative outcomes of acute appendicitis in pregnant and nonpregnant patients. Methods. A retrospective review of medical records of 56 pregnant patients between 2011 and 2016 who were compared with 164 nonpregnant women of reproductive age who underwent open appendectomy between 2014 and 2016 for acute appendicitis. The patient’s demographics and perioperative data were analyzed. Results. The median age of pregnant and nonpregnant patients observed was 26 years (range 19–37) and 26 years (range 18–43). There were no significant differences between the groups in negative appendectomy (21.4 and 21.3%, P=0.52), perforated appendicitis (25 and 23.8%, P=0.85), postoperative complications (28.6 and 26.8%, P=0.80), and median length of hospital stay (5 and 4.5 days, P=0.36). There were 3.6% preterm labour, no maternal mortality, and no fetal loss. In multivariate analysis, WBC >18000/mm3 and long patient time to surgery were independent risk factors for appendicular perforation and postoperative complication (P<0.05). Conclusion. Our results of appendectomy in pregnant patients are comparable with nonpregnant patients. Hence the same perioperative treatment protocol can be followed in pregnant and nonpregnant patients even in resource-poor setting.

scholarly journals Appendicular perforation and its contributing factors

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 2007
Author(s):  
Anandaravi B. N. ◽  
Ramaswami B.
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Perforated Appendicitis ◽  
Clinical History ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Delayed Presentation ◽  
Contributing Factors ◽  
Steroid Dependent

Background: The objective was to study of different risk factors contributing in appendicular perforation and effective management of patients by knowing risk factors.Methods: This study was conducted in the department of general surgery K. R. Hospital Mysore medical college and research institute, Mysore, Karnataka, India from January 2015 to June 2016. Patients of age above 18 years and both sexes operated for acute appendicitis were included in present study. The clinical history, clinical features, investigations, intraoperative findings, were noted and surgical procedure done and all perforated appendicitis cases were operated lower midline incision, through wash given with normal saline drain in situ. Post operatively antibiotics were given and all patients follow up done for one month.Results: Present study duration is one and half year we operated total 100 patients for acute appendicitis. In this study 55 patients were male (55%) and 45 patients were females (45%). According to our study acute appendicitis is more common in males. Appendicular perforation has noticed in 23 female patients. The incidence of perforated appendicitis is low in males 12 out of 35 as compared to females 23 out of 35. The incidence of appendicular perforation is higher in the extreme of ages. In the elderly patients it is 58.33%. Thus, according to present study findings age above (>40 years) is strongly associated with the perforated appendicitis (p<0.001 chi squared test). Delayed presentation shows 77.41% appendicular perforation and faecolith associated with 64.51%.Conclusions: The morbidity and mortality rates are higher in elderly patients, diabetics, steroid dependent and immunocompromised patients. We should be aggressive in the treatment of acute appendicitis associated with high risk factors. So once acute appendicitis is diagnosed, the expedient surgery and appropriate use of perioperative antibiotics can help in reducing the morbidity and mortality.

scholarly journals A retrospective study on laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1144
Author(s):  
P. Senthil Kumar ◽  
S. Edwin Kin’s Raj ◽  
Saranya Nagalingam
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Acute Appendicitis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Laparoscopic Group ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Early Return

Background: Appendectomy is the most common surgical procedure performed in emergency surgery. Open appendectomy is the “gold standard” for the treatment of acute appendicitis. Laparoscopic appendectomy though widely practiced has not gained universal approval. Our aim is to compare the safety and benefits of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in a retrospective study.Methods: The study was done as a retrospective study among 387 patients diagnosed with appendicitis for a period of 18 months in the Dept of General Surgery. All patients included were 16 years and above and followed up for 3 weeks. In this study, 130 patients diagnosed as acute appendicitis - underwent open appendectomy and 257 patients diagnosed as sub-acute cases of appendicitis - underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. These two groups (open & laparoscopic) were compared for operative time, length of hospital stay, postoperative pain, complication rate, early return to normal activity.Results: Laparoscopic appendectomy was associated with a shorter hospital stay (around 4.5 days), with a less need for analgesia and with an early return to daily activities (around 11.5 days). Operative time was significantly shorter in the open group (35 mins), when compared with laparoscopic group (around 59 mins). Total number of complications was less in the Laparoscopic group with a significantly lower incidence of post-op pain and complications.Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach is a safe and efficient operative procedure and it provides clinically beneficial advantages over open appendectomy (including shorter hospital stay, an early return to daily activities and less post-op complications).

scholarly journals Study of laparoscopic appendectomy: advantages, disadvantages and reasons for conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomy

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 993
Author(s):  
Sujan Narayan Agrawal ◽  
Sunita Meshram ◽  
Kamlesh Dhruv
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Infection ◽  
Laparoscopic Appendectomy ◽  
Open Appendectomy ◽  
Laparoscopic Approach ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Organ Injury ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Duration Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Duration Of Surgery

Background:Good outcome has been reported with the laparoscopic approach in uncomplicated appendicitis, but a higher incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses has been reported after laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Objective was to study the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy.Methods: A Hospital based cross sectional study was carried out among of 302 patients. The study duration was from June 2004 to December 2006. Institutional Ethics Committee permission was obtained. Informed individual consent was taken. Out of 302 subjects, 236 underwent open appendectomy and 66 underwent laparoscopic appendectomy.Results:It was observed that in both the groups majority patients had retrocecal position of the appendix. The amount of blood loss, adjacent organ injury and duration of surgery were similar in both the groups. The difference in the incidence of wound infection in both groups was not found to be statistically significant. But the antibiotic use was significantly less in the LA group compared to OA group. It was found that time to resumptions of oral fees, duration of hospital stay and time to return to normal duties were significantly lesser in LA group compared to OA group. (p < 0.001). As per the cosmetic end result, majorities were satisfied in LA group and rated the surgery as excellent as compared to patients in OA group.Conclusions:Laparoscopic appendectomy was better than open appendectomy with respect to wound infection, tackling co-existing pathology, duration of hospital stay, earlier return to normal activity, excellent cosmetic end result, lesser use of antibiotics and earlier resumption of oral feeds.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Elderly: An Experience at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Western Nepal

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tika Ram Bhandari ◽  
Sudha Shahi ◽  
Rajeev Bhandari ◽  
Rajesh Poudel
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Elderly Population ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Young Group ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Care Hospital

Background. The incidence of gallstone increases with increasing age. No studies have been reported in the elderly population with laparoscopic cholecystectomy from developing nations. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy between the elderly (≥60 years old) and the young (<60 years old).Methods. From July 2015 to June 2016, a retrospective review of medical records of 78 elderly patients (≥60 years old) and 164 young patients (<60 years old) who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy was done. The patients’ demographics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed.Results. Median ages were 65 years (range: 60–80) and 45 years (range: 21–59) for the elderly group and the young group. The majority of patients were female (62.8 and 72%). There were no significant differences in the conversion rate (9 and 7.9%,P=0.78), postoperative complications (17.9 and 14.6%,P=0.50), and length of stay in the hospital (4 days for both groups,P=0.35) between the two groups. There was no mortality in either of the groups.Conclusion. Our results of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients are comparable with those in young patients. Therefore, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe even in the elderly population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document