In Vitro Comparison of the Effectiveness of Conventional Hand Excavation and Rotary Instrument in Caries Removal in Primary Teeth

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berna Türk ◽  
Zeynep Ökte
2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1177-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. Yazici ◽  
P. Atílla ◽  
G. Özgünaltay ◽  
S. Müftüoglu

2009 ◽  
Vol 43 (5) ◽  
pp. 405-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.M. Braga ◽  
F.M. Mendes ◽  
S. Martignon ◽  
D.N.J. Ricketts ◽  
K.R. Ekstrand

2002 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mozammal Hossain ◽  
Yukio Nakamura ◽  
Yoshishige Yamada ◽  
Yoshiko Murakami ◽  
Koukichi Matsumoto

In this in vitro study, the compositional and structural changes of human dentin, and knoop harness of cavity floor following the removal of dental caries by Er,Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in primary teeth was compared with that of the conventional bur cavity. The results confirmed that laser irradiation revealed minimal thermal damage to the surrounding tissues, minimal thermal induced changes of dental hard tissue compositions, and favorable surface characteristic.


Author(s):  
Priya Subramaniam ◽  
S Konde ◽  
DK Mandanna

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Molaasadollah ◽  
Mohammad Asnaashari ◽  
Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas ◽  
Maral Jafary

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 1027-1032 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesham S Khalil ◽  
Shabnam Gulzar ◽  
Ruchi Arora ◽  
Altaf H Shah ◽  
Bhupendra Bhardwaj ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Introduction Chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) is an effective method of caries removal especially for primary teeth as they cause less discomfort when compared with conventional caries removal. The most significant thing about caries removal is the elimination of cariogenic bacteria. This study compares the antibacterial activity of two CMCR gels. Materials and methods A total of 40 primary molar teeth with carious dentin were split along the long axis in a laboratory. Total viable count (TVC) was taken for the teeth before splitting as a measure of colony-forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). Each half was treated with either Carisolv or Carie-Care CMCR gels. Clean dentin samples were evaluated for Streptococcus mutans (SM) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (LB) after removal of carious tissue using the caries removal gels using serial dilutions and incubating on specific agar plates. Results The results showed significant reduction in mean TVC after use of both the CMCR gels. Both gels reduced the CFU/mL of SM and LB to a significant level (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the antibacterial activities of the two CMCR gels. Conclusion The CMCR gels (Carisolv and Carie-Care) significantly reduced the residual TVC as well as SM and LB in carious primary dentin. Both CMCR gels had a similar antibacterial activity on the carious dentin of primary teeth. Clinical significance The CMCR gels tested have a significant antibacterial activity and can be effectively used for elimination of caries-causing bacteria in primary teeth. How to cite this article Gulzar S, Arora R, Shah AH, Bhardwaj B, Abusalim G, Khalil HS, Wyne AH. Antibacterial Activity of Two Chemomechanical Caries Removal Gels on Carious Dentin of Primary Teeth: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(12):1027-1032.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Gupta ◽  
C Singh ◽  
Y Ramakrishna ◽  
K Chaudhry ◽  
AK Munshi

Objective: To evaluate clinically and microbiologically the efficacy of Papacarie® in the removal of carious dentin in both permanent and primary teeth. Study design: Thirty permanent and primary molars with dentinal carious lesions were excavated and subjected to clinical and microbiological assessment before and after application of Papacarie®. The gel was further tested for in vitro antimicrobial efficacy against standard cariogenic micro-organisms using agar diffusion assay. Results: Papacarie® was able to differentiate between infected and affected dentin clinically along with high patient comfort during caries excavation. The mean time taken for caries removal and restoration was observed to be 4.17 ± 0.40 min. and 8.57 ± 0.45 min. for permanent teeth and 4.21 ± 0.36 min. and 9.24 ± 0.58 min. for primary teeth. There was a significant reduction in the total viable colony forming units from the dentin samples before and after application of Papacarie®. It was also observed that Papacarie® had no inhibitory effect on standard cariogenic microorganisms in the agar diffusion assay. Conclusions: Papacarie® is an effective caries removal method clinically in both permanent and primary teeth. The number of viable microorganisms after complete caries excavation using Papacarie® still appears to be high and this bacterial count should be tackled by a suitable restorative material with potent antimicrobial activity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document