scholarly journals Extension for Downward Continuation of the Method of "Upward Continuation of Potential Field on Spherical Patch Area"

2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-62
Author(s):  
Sung-Ho Na ◽  
Tae Woong Chung ◽  
Young Hong Shin
2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 245-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Ho Na ◽  
Tae Woong Chung ◽  
Young Hong Shin

Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 390-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Pawlowski

A new class of filter transfer function derived from Wiener filter and Green’s equivalent layer principles is presented for upward and downward‐continuation enhancement of potential‐field data. The newly developed transfer function is called the preferential continuation operator. In contrast to the conventional continuation operator, the preferential continuation operator possesses a continuation response that acts preferentially upon a specific band of the observed potential field’s Fourier amplitude spectrum. The transfer function response approaches the response of an all‐pass filter away from this band. This response characteristic is useful for at least two common potential‐field signal enhancement applications. First, it is possible with preferential upward continuation to attenuate shallow‐source, short‐wavelength, potential‐field signals while minimally attenuating deep‐source, long wavelength signals (as often happens after application of conventional upward continuation) Second, it is possible with preferential downward continuation to enhance deep‐source, long wavelength signals without overamplifying shallow‐source, short‐wavelength signals (as often happens after application of conventional downward continuation) Preferential continuation, used qualitatively for anomaly enhancement, ably overcomes these two limitations of conventional continuation enhancement.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Yuan ◽  
Wenna Zhou ◽  
Xiangyu Zhang ◽  
Guochao Wu ◽  
Shuiliang Tang ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 205-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoqing Ma ◽  
Cai Liu ◽  
Danian Huang ◽  
Lili Li

Geophysics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 723-723
Author(s):  
Nelson C. Steenland

This paper deals with gradients, not residuals. Computing a field up, then subtracting the “up” field from the original field to find residuals obviously involves shifting datums. Apparently the author got caught up in his equation (17) concerning the simple case of deriving the anomaly of a slab by subtracting the anomaly of one infinite prism from another of the same cross‐section but at a slightly smaller depth. That the anomaly of a slab behaves like the gradient (first vertical derivative) of the prism’s anomaly is apparent from the fact that the field of an infinitely thick slab attenuates by one power less than the field of a slab which approximates an infinitely thin body.


Geophysics ◽  
1954 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
César A. Trejo

Comparing calculated and exact values in an ideal example, it is shown that Peters’ proposed method of downward continuation of gravity is far less suitable than a combination of Peters’ procedure for upward continuation and a finite differences method for downward continuation. It is shown also how Peters’ method can be substantially improved by considering only the closest values in the downward step of a continuation process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document