scholarly journals Telehealth Adaptation for Multidisciplinary Colorectal Cancer Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blessing O Aghedo ◽  
Shane Svoboda ◽  
Leslie Holmes ◽  
Lillian Man ◽  
Yin Wu ◽  
...  
Endoscopy ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Horgan ◽  
DNA Iskandar ◽  
L O'Brien ◽  
S McGovern ◽  
T Scanlon ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 788-795
Author(s):  
Ana C. De Roo ◽  
Arden M. Morris ◽  
Joceline V. Vu ◽  
Ari D. Schuman ◽  
Kenneth L. Abbott ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joceline V. Vu ◽  
Arden M. Morris ◽  
Lillias H. Maguire ◽  
Ana C. De Roo ◽  
Anudeep Mukkamala ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 105 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mathews ◽  
D. Ryan ◽  
D. Bulman

BackgroundThis study set out to identify patterns in the causes of waits and wait-related satisfaction.MethodsWe conducted qualitative interviews with urban, semi-urban, and rural patients (n = 60) to explore their perceptions of the waits they experienced in the detection and treatment of their breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer. We asked participants to describe their experiences from the onset of symptoms to the start of treatment at the cancer clinic and their satisfaction with waits at various intervals. Interview transcripts were coded using a thematic approach.ResultsPatients identified five groups of wait-time causes:Patient-related (beliefs, preferences, and non-cancer health issues)Treatment-related (natural consequences of treatment)System-related (the organization or functioning of groups, workforce, institution, or infrastructure in the health care system)Physician-related (a single physician responsible for a specific element in the patient’s care)Other causes (disruptions to normal operations of a city or community as a whole) With the limited exception of physician-related absences, the nature of the cause was not linked to overall satisfaction or dissatisfaction with waits.ConclusionsCauses in themselves do not explain wait-related satisfaction. Further work is needed to explore the underlying reasons for wait-related satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Although our findings shed light on patient experiences with the health system and identify where interventions could help to inform the expectations of patients and the public with respect to wait time, more research is needed to understand wait-related satisfaction among cancer patients.


BMJ ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 301 (6748) ◽  
pp. 366-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
R S Houlston ◽  
V Murday ◽  
C Harocopos ◽  
C B Williams ◽  
J Slack

2000 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Veronica Collins ◽  
Jane Halliday ◽  
Rosemary Warren ◽  
Robert Williamson

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasan Al Chalabi ◽  
James M. O’Riordan ◽  
Alex Richardson ◽  
Delia Flannery ◽  
Katrina O'Connor ◽  
...  

Aims and Objectives. To review the experience of a nurse-led colorectal cancer follow-up clinic in a tertiary referral colorectal cancer centre.Methodology. Data from the nurse-led colorectal cancer follow-up clinic in our unit was prospectively maintained in a colorectal cancer database. Data was analysed from January 1, 2006 until the December 31, 2011.Results. 1125 patients were diagnosed with colorectal cancer, and referred to our unit as a tertiary centre for specialised colorectal cancer. Nine hundred and four patients had surgical resection of their colorectal cancer. Four hundred and seven patients were referred to the nurse-led colorectal cancer clinic for surveillance. The mean age of the patient cohort was 67 years (range 32–88) and 56% of patients were male. One hundred and seventeen patients were discharged to their general practitioner having been disease free after 5 years of followup. Fifty-four patients were diagnosed with either local or distant recurrence.Conclusion. A nurse-led colorectal cancer follow-up clinic is running according to strict follow-up protocols. This type of clinic significantly reduces the number of routine follow-up patients that have to be seen by the colorectal surgical consultant.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 33-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Dalton ◽  
Nicky Forsyth ◽  
Christopher Vickery ◽  
Ian Eyre-Brook

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document