scholarly journals Differentiating Pemphigus Foliaceus From Pemphigus Vulgaris in Clinical Practice

Cureus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie Stumpf ◽  
Simo Huang ◽  
Lawrence D Hall ◽  
Sylvia Hsu
2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-15
Author(s):  
Alexey V. Samtsov ◽  
Evgeny V. Sokolovskiy ◽  
Natalia P. Teplyuk ◽  
Irena E. Belousova ◽  
Muza M. Kokhan ◽  
...  

Analysis of various classifications of pemphigus shows that there are no fundamental differences between them. The main distinctions consist in use of diverse terms in naming of some forms of pemphigus and in inclusion or exclusion of certain subtypes from the classifications. Authors propose to use the following classification in the dermatological clinical practice, for educational and scientific purposes and for clinical guidelines: 1) pemphigus vulgaris (1.1. Pemphigu s vegetans); 2) pemphigus foliaceus (2.1. Pemphigus endemic (Fogo selvagem), 2.2. Pemphigus erythematosus (Senear Usher)); 3) herpetiform pemphigus; 4) paraneoplastic pemphigus; 5) IgA pemphigus (5.1. Subcorneal pustular dermatosis, 5.2. Intraepidermal neutrophilic dermatosis).


2001 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 421-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Ogata ◽  
H. Nakajima ◽  
M. Ikeda ◽  
Y. Yamamoto ◽  
M. Amagai ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 156 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-641 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.F. Mentink ◽  
M.C.J.M. de Jong ◽  
G.J. Kloosterhuis ◽  
J. Zuiderveen ◽  
M.F. Jonkman ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masataka Arakawa ◽  
Teruki Dainichi ◽  
Shinichiro Yasumoto ◽  
Takashi Hashimoto

1995 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daryl J. Emery ◽  
Luis K. Diaz ◽  
Janet A. Fairley ◽  
Argelia Lopez ◽  
Ann F. Taylor ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Frew ◽  
Linda K. Martin ◽  
Dédée F. Murrell

1998 ◽  
pp. 811-816
Author(s):  
Janet A. Fairley ◽  
Xiang Ding ◽  
George J. Giudice ◽  
Luis A. Diaz

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Sar-Pomian ◽  
Lidia Rudnicka ◽  
Malgorzata Olszewska

Scalp is a unique location for pemphigus because of the abundance of desmogleins localized in hair follicles. Scalp involvement is observed in up to 60% of patients in the course of pemphigus. The lesions may occasionally lead to alopecia. Unforced removal of anagen hairs in a pull test is a sign of high disease activity. Direct immunofluorescence of plucked hair bulbs is considered a reliable diagnostic method in patients with pemphigus. Follicular acantholysis is a characteristic histopathological feature of pemphigus lesions localized on the scalp. Trichoscopy may serve as a supplementary method in the diagnosis of pemphigus. This review summarizes the most recent data concerning scalp involvement in pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. A systematic literature search was conducted in three medical databases: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The analysis included literature data about desmoglein distribution in hair follicles, as well as information about clinical manifestations, histopathology, immunopathology, and trichoscopy of scalp lesions in pemphigus and their response to treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document