scholarly journals Comparison of Two Doses of Chloroprocaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Brachytherapy Procedures: A Randomised Clinical Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashidhar Gowdra Sugandarajappa ◽  
N Sneha ◽  
Namrata Ranganath
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Maximum Level ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Good Choice ◽  
Duration Of Action ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Subarachnoid Block ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Subarachnoid block is a widely used anaesthetic technique for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. Commonly used local anaesthetics are with longer duration of action and delayed recovery. Chloroprocaine is good choice for day care procedures because of its reliable action, faster resolution of block and earlier discharge time. Aim: To compare the minimum effective dose of chloroprocaine for spinal anaesthesia in brachytherapy. Materials and Methods: A total of 140 carcinoma cervix patients of ASA class I and II of age group 18 to 60 years were randomly divided into two groups of 70 each. They were posted for elective brachytherapy procedure under subarachnoid block. Group A patients received 2 mL of chloroprocaine (20 mg) and Group B patients received 3 mL of chloroprocaine (30 mg). Parameters like onset of sensory and motor blocks, maximum level of sensory block, time for two segment regression, duration of block and haemodynamic parameters were studied for the duration of procedure. Data were analysed using SAS 9.2, SPSS 15.0 software version. Descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was carried out. Results on continuous measurements are presented as mean±SD (min-max) and results on categorical measurements are presented in number (%). Significance was assessed at 5% level of significance. Results: Patients in both the groups were comparable with respect to the demographic characteristics. There were statistically significant differences in time for onset of motor blockade, duration of motor and sensory blockade, time for two segment regression which were shorter in chloroprocaine 20 mg (group A) compared to chloroprocaine 30 mg (group B). Haemodynamic variations and incidence of side-effects were similar in both groups. Conclusion: Subarachnoid 2-chloroprocaine (30 mg) provides adequate duration and density of spinal anaesthesia for brachytherapy procedures as compared with 20 mg 2-chloroprocaine.

scholarly journals Isobaric levobupivacaine a better and safer substitute for spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing prolonged lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 3111
Author(s):  
Wasimul Hoda ◽  
Abhishek Kumar ◽  
Priodarshi Roychoudhury
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Bupivacaine being the drug of choice for spinal anaesthesia is associated with serious cardiac toxicity. Levobupivacaine and ropivacaine, both being the two S enantiomers of bupivacaine can be a safer alternatives with better cardiovascular safety. Hence, the clinical efficacy of both were assessed and compared in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia.Methods: A prospective randomized controlled double blind study was done in 68 adult posted for elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia. They were randomized into 2 groups. About 3ml isobaric levobupivacaine 0.5% (15mg) was given in group A and 3ml isobaric ropivacaine 0.5% (15mg) was given in group B. Onset, duration of sensory and motor blocks, time for maximum sensory and motor block, time for 2 segment sensory regression and haemodynamic parameters were recorded and analyzed.Results: All patients achieved a sensory block of T10 dermatome. Onset of sensory blockade at T10 was similar in both groups, group A (5.71±1.31min) and group B (5.94±1.72min). Time from injection to two dermatomal regression was 129.68±15.54min in group A and 111.38±22.35min in group B. Onset of Bromage score of 1 in group A was 4.68±1.27min and in group B was 6.44±1.64min. The mean duration of motor and complete motor block was prolonged in group A patients (197.74±18.51min, 168.82±17.90 min) as compared to group B (131.88±20.41min, 106.71±10.85min).Conclusions: Isobaric levobupivacaine was found to be a better and safer substitute for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing prolonged lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries.

scholarly journals Comparison of Intrathecal Fentanyl and Butorphanol as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Bupivacaine 0.5% in Infraumbilical Surgeries- A Randomised Double Blind Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandip Roy Basunia ◽  
Prosenjit Mukherjee ◽  
Md Bakir Hossain Munshi
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Motor Block ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Neuraxial opioids are widely used as adjuvants to local anaesthetic as they improve quality and duration of block. Neuraxial opioids like Butorphanol and Fentanyl allow prolonged analgesia in the postoperative period and faster recovery from spinal anaesthesia. Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of Butorphanol and Fentanyl combined with bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in infraumbilical surgeries. Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomised controlled trial in which 110, ASA I and II patients of either sex who underwent elective infraumbilical surgeries under spinal anaesthesia were selected. Patients were allocated randomly into two groups A (n=55) and B (n=55). Group A (F) received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (3 mL) with fentanyl 25 microgram (0.5 mL) to make it total 3.5 mL. Group B (B) received intrathecal 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 12.5 mg (3 mL) with butorphanol 250 microgram (0.25 mL) and Normal Saline (NS) 0.25 mL to make it total 3.5 mL. Heart Rate (HR), Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (SBP, DBP), two segment regression time of sensory block, motor block were assessed at preset intervals. Chi-square test or Fischer’s-exact test were used and a p-value ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: Mean of two segment sensory regression time of Group A was 41.94±1.73 minutes and Group B was 50.56±4.43 minutes (p<0.0001). Time to onset of motor block in Group A was 5.28±.32 minutes and Group B was 5.27±.32 minutes (p=0.96). Mean duration of motor block in Group A was 81.23±4.87 minutes and Group B was 109.83±2.61 minutes (p<0.0001). Time to rescue analgesic was 289.27±7.37 minutes in Group A and 378.41±10.25 minutes in Group B (p<0.0001). HR, SBP and DBP were comparable among the groups. Conclusion: Intrathecal bupivacaine-butorphanol mixture was clinically better as it provided longer duration of analgesia with lesser incidences of pruritus and nausea/vomiting compared to intrathecal fentanyl-bupivacaine mixture.

Compare the Analgesic Efficacy of Dexmedetomidineand Fentanyl as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine for Lower Limb Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2153-2155
Author(s):  
Arshi Naz ◽  
Mirza Shahzad Baig ◽  
Vijai Kumar ◽  
Samita S Khan ◽  
Sidra Javed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
P Value ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Rescue Analgesia ◽  
Sensory Blockade ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Lower Limb Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To compare the analgesic effectiveness of Dexmedetomidine and Fentanyl as an adjuvant to 0.5% Bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia for patients undergoing lower limb surgery. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Place & Duration:The study was conducted at department of Anesthesia, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Institute of Trauma, Karachi for duration from 15thJuly2020 to 15thFebruary 2021. Methods: In this study 52 patients of both genders undergoing lower limb surgeries were included. Patient’s ages were ranging from 20 to 70 years. All the patients were divided into two Groups. Group A included 26 patients and received Inj. Dexmedetomidine 10 μg in 0.5ml normal saline with 12.5mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine, Group B had 26 patients and received 25mg fentanyl with 12.5mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Time to achieve T10 blockade, time to first rescue analgesia were examined and compare between both groups. All the statistical data was analyzed by SPSS 24.0. P-Value <0.05 was significantly considered. Results: Mean age of group A was 40.52±12.28 years and in group B it was 40.14±13.34 years. There were 18 (69.23%) male patients and 8 (30.77%) females in group A while in Group B 19 (73.08%) patients were male and 7 (26.92%) were females. No significant difference was observed between both groups regarding time to T10 blockade with p-value >0.05. A significant difference was found regarding time to rescue analgesia, in Group A it was 426.58±92.44 minutes and in Group B, it was 206.44±48.47 minutes (p-value <0.0001). Patients’ satisfaction was high in dexemedetomidine group as compared to fentanyl group. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine 10 μg with 0.5% bupvicaine showed better effectiveness regarding time to first rescue analgesia as compared to fentanyl. No significant difference was observed regarding time to sensory blockade between both medications. Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Fentanyl, Spinal Anaesthesia, Lower Limb Surgery, Sensory Block, Analgesia

scholarly journals Spinal Anaesthesia with Hyperbaric Prilocaine in Day-Case Perianal Surgery: Randomised Controlled Trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozden Gorgoz Kaban ◽  
Dilek Yazicioglu ◽  
Taylan Akkaya ◽  
M. Murat Sayin ◽  
Duray Seker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
Day Case ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Versus Group ◽  
Group B ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Fentanyl Group

Background. The local anaesthetics used in day-case spinal anaesthesia should provide short recovery times. We aimed to compare hyperbaric prilocaine and bupivacaine in terms of sensory block resolution and time to home readiness in day-case spinal anaesthesia.Methods. Fifty patients undergoing perianal surgery were randomized into two groups. The bupivacaine-fentanyl group (Group B) received 7.5 mg, 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 20 μg fentanyl in total 1.9 mL. The prilocaine-fentanyl group (Group P) received 30 mg, 0.5% hyperbaric prilocaine + 20 μg fentanyl in the same volume.Results. Time to L1 block and maximum block was shorter in Group P than in Group B (Group P4.6±1.3 min versus Group B5.9±01.9 min,P=0.017, and Group P13.2±7.5 min versus Group B15.3±6.6 min,P=0.04). The time to L1 regression and S3 regression of the sensorial block was significantly shorter in Group P than in Group B (45.7±21.9 min versus59.7±20.9 min,P=0.024, and133.8±41.4 min versus200.4±64.8 min,P<0.001). The mean time to home readiness was shorter for Group P than for Group B (155±100.2 min versus207.2±62.7 min(P<0.001)).Conclusion. Day-case spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric prilocaine + fentanyl is superior to hyperbaric bupivacaine in terms of earlier sensory block resolution and home readiness and the surgical conditions are comparable for perianal surgery.

scholarly journals High-Volume Spinal Anaesthesia. A Dose-Response Study of Bupivacaine 0.125%

1992 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 443-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. B. Tay ◽  
S. M. Tay ◽  
E. Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Complete Recovery ◽  
Sensory Level ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dose Response Study

The clinical effects of high-volume spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine 0.125% were studied in 30 patients presenting for postpartum sterilisation. Group A, B and C patients received 6, 8 and 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.125% respectively. Onset, duration and regression of sensory block and motor blockade, haemodynamic parameters and postoperative complications were studied. A sensory level of T10 was reliably obtained in Group B and C but not in Group A. Similarly motor blockade was unreliable in Group A compared with Group B (P < 0.05) and Group C (P < 0.05). Two segment regression times were similar in all three groups. L1 regression times were 4 7.9, 94.3 and 99.0 minutes in Groups A, B and C respectively. The corresponding times for complete recovery of motor power were 120, 212.3 and 182.7 minutes respectively (P < 0.01 when Group A compared to B and C). A significant incidence of high spinal anaesthesia occurred when 10 ml bupivacaine 0.125% was administered (P < 0.05 when compared with Group A). No patient experienced respiratory discomfort in spite of sensory levels of up to T1. Hypotension responded readily to intravenous fluids and small doses of ephedrine (three patients). Only one patient (Group A) developed a postdural puncture headache. In this study, high-volume spinal anaesthesia with bupivacaine 0.125% was found to be satisfactory for postpartum tubal ligation. The optimal volume of bupivacaine 0.125% was 8 ml.

scholarly journals Comparison of Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine as Intrathecal Adjuvants to Spinal Anaesthesia for Abdominal Hysterectomy

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (213) ◽  
pp. 848-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binod Gautam ◽  
Sushila Tabdar ◽  
Ujma Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Abdominal Hysterectomy ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
First Choice ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Spinal anaesthesia, although advantageous for conducting abdominal hysterectomy, is not the first choice amongst surgeons for fear of intra-operative visceral pain. Intrathecal adjuvants may improve quality of spinal anaesthesia. This study aims to compare efficacy of intrathecal Fentanyl and Dexmedetomidine to reduce visceral pain during abdominal hysterectomy performed under spinal anaesthesia. Methods: Sixty women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy for benign indications were randomly assigned to two equal groups in a double-blind fashion. Fentanyl 25 micrograms in group A or Dexmedetomidine 10 micrograms in group B was co-administered with hyperbaric Bupivacaine 15 milligrams for spinal anesthesia. Surgery through Pfannenstiel incision proceeded once sensory block reached eighth thoracic dermatome. The intra-operative visceral pain was assessed using a five-point scale: none, mild, intermediate, severe, and failed spinal anaesthesia. Duration of analgesia and peri-operative events were studied for 24 hours. Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test and Student’s t-test were used for analysis. Level of significance used was P<0.05. Results: Fifty eight participants completed the study. Demographic variables and sensory block were similar between groups. General anaesthesia was not required in both groups. Significantly greater number of patients in group A required medications for visceral pain with Relative Risk of 2.8 (1.16-6.7). Pruritus and shivering occurred significantly higher in group A. Hypotension was significantly higher in group B. Post-operatively, group B patients showed a significantly longer duration of analgesia. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine is better than Fentanyl as an intrathecal adjuvant to spinal anaesthesia in minimizing visceral pain during abdominal hysterectomy and in prolonging post-operative analgesia.

scholarly journals Effects of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anaesthesia in Adults Undergoing Elective Infra-umbilical Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 56 (208) ◽  
pp. 379-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binod Gautam ◽  
Sujata Niroula ◽  
Mona Sharma ◽  
Sushila Moktan Lama
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Visceral Pain ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
P Value ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Introduction: Various adjuvants to local anaesthetic are used to improve quality and duration of spinal anaesthesia. Dexmedetomidine, a novel alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, has been proposed to augment local anaesthetic effects. This study aims to investigate effects of intrathecal Dexmedetomidine on duration of analgesia and duration of sensory block during spinal anaesthesia. Methods: In this randomized double-blind study 38 patients were allocated into each of two groups. Otherwise healthy patients (18 to 75 years) scheduled for inguinal hernia repair or vaginal hysterectomy were included. For spinal anaesthesia, Group A received 2.5 ml hyperbaric Bupivacaine 0.5%, whereas Group B received five micrograms intrathecal Dexmedetomidine in addition. Characteristics of sensory and motor blocks, duration of analgesia, analgesic requirements, and side effects were studied for 24 hours. Student’s t-test for quantitative variables and Chi- squared test for qualitative variables were used for statistical analysis. Results: Duration of analgesia was prolonged in Group B (326 min ±91) as compared to 217 min ±98 in Group A (P value <0.05). Sensory and motor block durations were significantly prolonged in Group B. Time taken to reach significant peak sensory block level was earlier in Group B. Significant reductions in incidence of visceral pain, shivering and analgesic requirements were observed in Dexmedetomidine group, without increased need of medications for altered hemodynamic parameters. Conclusions: Dexmedetomidineas an intrathecal adjuvant to hyperbaric Bupivacaine in spinal anaesthesia prolongs duration of analgesia and sensory block with minimal adverse effects. Keywords: Bupivacaine; Dexmedetomidine; intrathecal adjuvant; spinal anaesthesia.

scholarly journals Effect of Verapamil Adjuvant with Local Anaesthetic Mixtures in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-47
Author(s):  
Md Arman Ali ◽  
Md Latifur Rahman ◽  
Mehdi Hassan ◽  
Rezwanur Rahman ◽  
Kai Nur Asfia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brachial Plexus ◽  
Brachial Plexus Block ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Local Anaesthetics ◽  
P Value ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Plexus Block

Among the various approaches to block brachial plexus , supraclavicular approach offers a high success rate for elbow, forearm and hand surgery . Various adjuvant drugs have been used with local anesthetics in order to decrease the time of onset and prolong the duration and quality of regional blocks. So efforts were made to combine the adjuvant with local anesthetics to improve patient and surgeon satisfaction. In this randomized study we tried to see the effect of verapamil in brachial plexus block as an adjuvant with local anaesthetic .This randomized study wasconducted in Anaesthesiology department of ShaheedZiaurRahman Medical College Hospital after approved by the ethical review board of this hospital.The study subject were divided into two groups (Group A=only local anaesthetics&Group B=local anaesthetics with Verapamil) , 30 IN numbers in each group. Group-A patients was administered 15ml of 1% lignocaine with 15 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% while in Group-B patients was administered injection verapamil 3.5 ml (3.5 mg) in addition to the above mixture. In this study mean onset time of sensory block was 11.53 ± 1.4 minutes in group - A and 7.12 ± 1.68 minutes in group – B which is not statistically significant (p value = 0.057). The mean onset time of motor block in group A was 15.26 ± 1.96 min, and in group B was 11.58 ± 2.68 min and this difierence isstatistically significant (p value=0.000152). Duration of motor block was 96.30 min and 115.08 min in group A and Group B respectively. Sensory block was 157.26 min and 188.0 min in group A and Group B respectively. Regarding the heart rate, no significant difference was detected between the groups at the time of preanesthesia and at the 5 min after anaesthesia. Compared with group B patients, group A patients shows slight but statistically significant increased heart rate at the 10 min (80, 92 beat/min respectively) after brachial plexus block. At 30 minute after, mean systolic BP was 97.9±4.7 mmHg in group A and 84.3±5.0 mmHg in group B. At 45 minute after, mean systolic blood pressure was 94.6±15.6 mmHg and 84.3±5.0 mmHg in group A and group B respectively. At 60 minutes after, mean systolic blood pressure was 59.6±6.0 mmHg in group A and 61.2±9.4 mmHg in group B. At 15, 30 and 45 minute difference was statistically significant (p<0.05) between two groups. In conclusion, the study revealed that verapamil can be used as an adjuvant to decrease the onset time of sensory and motor blocks of bupivacaine in supraclavicular block. Moreover, verapamil doses in regional blocks did not show any hemodynamic side effects. Bangladesh Med J. 2017 May; 46 (2): 43-47

scholarly journals EFFICACY OF ANALGESIA PROVIDED BY ULTRASOUND GUIDED FASCIA ILIACA COMPARTMENT BLOCK WITH AND WITHOUT PARACETAMOL (I.V) IN FACILITATING POSITION FOR CENTRAL NEURAXIAL PROCEDURE

2020 ◽  
pp. 33-34
Author(s):  
Preethi HN ◽  
Pawan Kumar C ◽  
Ravishankar BM
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Onset Time ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Fascia Iliaca Block ◽  
Group B ◽  
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block

Introduction: The use of ultrasound reduces the onset time, improves the quality of sensory block, and minimizes the risks associated with the block. There are few studies supporting the efficacy of ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block Methodology: 60 patients posted for femur surgeries admitted in Orthopaedics Department, were assessed for the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were included in the study after obtaining written informed consent. Results: Among the patients undergoing spinal anaesthesia in fracture femur surgery, 3.3% of patients of both the groups had not satisfactory positioning, 36.7% of Group A and 33.3% of Group B had satisfactory positioning, 50% of Group A and 53.4% of Group B patients had good positioning, 10% of patients of both groups had optimal positioning. Conclusion: Therefore the positioning of the patients for spinal anaesthesia is comparable and is no significant difference is seen among both the groups.

scholarly journals Comparative Study of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Plus Ketamine Vs Bupivacaine Plus Fentanyl for Spinal Anaesthesia during Caeserean Section

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-291
Author(s):  
SK Shrestha ◽  
B Bhattarai ◽  
R Shah
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Spinal Anaesthesia ◽  
Sensory Block ◽  
Motor Blockade ◽  
Spinal Analgesia ◽  
Hyperbaric Bupivacaine ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Dermatomal Level ◽  
Preservative Free

Background Spinal anesthesia is widely used for caesarean section due to its rapid onset, low failure rate, complete analgesia. Addition of intrathecal ketamine and opioids to local anaesthetics seems to improve the quality of block and prolong the duration of analgesia.Objectives The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of intrathecal ketamine mixed with hyperbaric bupivacaine to intrathecal fentanyl mixed with hyperbaric bupivacaine.Methods One hundred parturients ASA Grade I scheduled for elective or semiurgent caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia were randomly divided into two groups. Group A received 2ml (10 mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% plus 25 mg preservative free ketamine. Group B received 2ml (10mg) hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% plus 25?g fentanyl. The patients were observed intraoperatively for the onset of sensory block, degree of motor block and total duration of analgesia.Results The time to achieve Bromage scale 3 motor blockade was shorter in Group A than in Group B.(p= 0.445) whereas time to achieve highest dermatomal level of sensory block was shorter in Group A than in Group B (p= 0.143). The duration of spinal analgesia was longer in Group B than in Group A (p= 0.730). The frequency of side effect such as sedation score was higher in Group A compared to Group B (p= 0.048). The incidence of pruritus was significantly higher in Group B compared to Group A (p = 0.000).Conclusion Addition of preservative free ketamine lead to faster onset of sensory and motor blockade, although it did not prolong the duration of spinal analgesia compared to addition of fentanyl in parturients undergoing caesarean section with spinal anaesthesia.Kathmandu Univ Med J 2013; 11(4): 287-291

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document