scholarly journals Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Colloidal Particles of Ageratum conyzoides L. Plant Extracts

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 504-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Barminas
Soft Matter ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (15) ◽  
pp. 2870-2878 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Y. de Boer ◽  
R. N. U. Kok ◽  
A. Imhof ◽  
K. P. Velikov

Driven by the growing interest in using natural ingredients in food and beverages, novel plant protein-based particles are developed as all natural, edible white colorant and clouding agent.


2009 ◽  
Vol 287 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgi G. Yordanov ◽  
Nina V. Kaneva ◽  
Ceco D. Dushkin

Author(s):  
R. Surega ◽  
B. Anita ◽  
S. Ramakrishnan ◽  
K. Gunasekaran ◽  
S. Nakkeran

1999 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yadong Yin ◽  
Xiangling Xu ◽  
Xuewu Ge ◽  
Yu Lu ◽  
Zhicheng Zhang

2021 ◽  
Vol 87 (10) ◽  
pp. 63-73
Author(s):  
Nikolay Mchedlov-Petrossyan ◽  
Mykyta Marfunin ◽  
Volodymyr Klochkov ◽  
Petro Radionov

This article is devoted to the synthesis and characterization of the hydrosol of C70 of the son/nC70 type and to its coagulation by sodium chloride and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). At C70 concentration of 3.3×10–6 M, the electrokinetic potential is ζ= –40 ± 4 mV, the particle size expressed as Zeta-average is 97±3 nm; at higher C70 concentrations, 1.7×10–5 and 6.9×10–5 M, the size stays the same: 99 – 100 nm. The critical concentration of coagulation (CCC) values, were determined using the diameter increasing rate (DIR) on NaCl concentration. The CCCs are concentration-dependent: 250, 145, and 130 mM at C70 concentrations 3.3×10–6, 1.7×10–5, and 6.9×10–5 M, respectively. The CCC for the CTAB surfactant is much lower, about 5×10–3 mM. At 0.02 mM CTAB, however, the overcharging up to ζ = + 40 mV and stabilization of the colloidal particles take place. Interpretation of the hydrosol coagulation by NaCl using the Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek theory makes it possible to determine the Hamaker constant of the C70–C70 interaction in vacuum, if only electrostatic repulsion and molecular attraction are taking into account: AFF ≈ 7×10–20 J. On the other hand, if we use the value AFF = (16.0–16.6)×10–20 J, obtained earlier in the study of organosols, then the data for hydrosols can be explained only by the introduction of an additional type of interactions. Following the terms of Churaev and Derjaguin, one should take into account the structural contribution to the interaction energy, which stabilizes the hydrosol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document