scholarly journals Atypical Presentation of Medullary Syndrome in a Young Woman

Author(s):  
Geetanjali Sharma

Wallenburg syndrome occurs due to damage to lateral segment of the medulla. Medial medullary syndrome occurs due to damage to upper portion of the medulla. I report a case of a 30 years old woman diagnosed with medullary syndrome [both medial & lateral features] in absence of CT scan findings sent to the department of Physiology for electrophysiological tests like nerve conduction studies, blink reflex, brainstem auditory evoked potential (BERA) & visual evoked potential (VEP). She had loss of sensations on the ipsilateral half of face (right), hemisensory loss on contralateral trunk & extremities, headache, contralateral hemiparesis (left), ipsilateral lingual paresis with atrophy, fibrillations with contralateral positive Babinski’s sign. The electrophysiological tests showed decrease in conduction velocity of right facial nerve, left tibial & peroneal nerves with decreased amplitude. The nerve conduction studies of median nerve (both motor & sensory) were normal. In blink reflex, latency of R2 ipsilateral & R2 contralateral of supraorbital nerves were increased on right side. There were increased latencies of waves II, III, IV & V of BERA & increased P100 latencies in VEP. The results of the electrophysiological tests of the patient showed that she had features of both medial & lateral medullary syndrome suggesting a lesion of both upper & middle medulla. The CT scan in this case was normal but conduction of MRI & CT guided angiography of posterior cerebral & vertebral arteries could have further localized the lesion causing this mixed symptomology.

2005 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1388-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Di Clemente ◽  
Gianluca Coppola ◽  
Delphine Magis ◽  
Arnaud Fumal ◽  
Victor De Pasqua ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 1318-1318 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Kayamori ◽  
Q. S. Dickins ◽  
T. Yamada ◽  
J. Kimura

Author(s):  
Asli Koskderelioglu ◽  
Neslihan Eskut ◽  
Pinar Ortan ◽  
Hulya Ozkan Ozdemir ◽  
Selma Tosun

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline M. Owen ◽  
John Patterson ◽  
Richard B. Silberstein

Summary Research was undertaken to determine whether olfactory stimulation can alter steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) topography. Odor-air and air-only stimuli were used to determine whether the SSVEP would be altered when odor was present. Comparisons were also made of the topographic activation associated with air and odor stimulation, with the view toward determining whether the revealed topographic activity would differentiate levels of olfactory sensitivity by clearly identifying supra- and subthreshold odor responses. Using a continuous respiration olfactometer (CRO) to precisely deliver an odor or air stimulus synchronously with the natural respiration, air or odor (n-butanol) was randomly delivered into the inspiratory airstream during the simultaneous recording of SSVEPs and subjective behavioral responses. Subjects were placed in groups based on subjective odor detection response: “yes” and “no” detection groups. In comparison to air, SSVEP topography revealed cortical changes in response to odor stimulation for both response groups, with topographic changes evident for those unable to perceive the odor, showing the presence of a subconscious physiological odor detection response. Differences in regional SSVEP topography were shown for those who reported smelling the odor compared with those who remained unaware of the odor. These changes revealed olfactory modulation of SSVEP topography related to odor awareness and sensitivity and therefore odor concentration relative to thresholds.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document