scholarly journals Comparison and Evaluation of Seven Animal Models of Ischemic Skin Wound: A Review Article

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-37
Author(s):  
Mohammad Bayat ◽  
Sufan Chien
Keyword(s):  
Animal Models ◽  
Pressure Ulcers ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Skin Wound ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Skin Flaps ◽  
Concise Information ◽  
Therapeutic Protocols ◽  
The Web

Focusing on pathophysiology, prevention, and treatment of ischemic wounds is apriority for medical and basic scientists in order to develop new clinical approaches. However it is not always easy for researchers to choose optimal animal models for their particular assessments. This review provides concise information on all currently available ischemic animal models, including rabbits’ ear ischemic models, axial skin flaps (axial pattern flaps), burns, ischemic limbs, localized ischemic wounds, pressure ulcers, and skin flaps, along with their citations as a measure of their acceptance among other researchers. We searched the numerous databases consisting of PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. Key words included ischemic wound, skin, and animals alone or in combination. Some important features of the seven types of ischemia as well as their results are presented in Tables 1 -7. Table eight presents the results of entire groups of ischemic animal models, with their number of papers, number of wounds, and total and average Google Scholar citations, and web of science citations. We found that rabbits’ ear ischemic models, localized ischemic wounds, and pressure ulcers have the highest total and average citations amongst the studied groups. It was concluded that the rabbits’ ear ischemic model, rat pressure ulcer models, and localized ischemic wound models, have made the greatest contribution to our understanding of the pathophysiology of the ischemic wounds and increased production of new therapeutic protocols based on the citations reported by Google scholar and the web of science databases between 1977 and 2017.

scholarly journals Storage of primary and secondary scientific information: classification and access.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (3) ◽  
pp. 168-174
Author(s):  
Анна Запольская ◽  
Anna Zapolskaya ◽  
Сергей Шептунов ◽  
Sergey Sheptunov ◽  
Иван Воробьев ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Scientific Information ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Science Journalism ◽  
Research Papers ◽  
Information Classification ◽  
The Web

Annotation: The article analyzes the main tools for collecting, processing and analyzing the information necessary for the preparation of research papers, research papers and articles in science journalism. The authors classified the database storing primary and secondary scientific information, describes how to access these international information systems. Among them are allocated the largest and most influential scientometric and bibliographic databases, such as the Web of Science and its components, the system Scopus, Google Scholar, the domestic development of scientometric eLIBRARY, and a number of narrow-profile international databases dedicated to the search of scientific information.

scholarly journals Bibliometric profiles of top 50 most cited articles on bioactive glass

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-84
Author(s):  
Mamun Khan Sujon ◽  
Siti Noor Fazliah Mohd Noor ◽  
Muhammad Azrul Bin Zabidi ◽  
Khairul Anuar Shariff ◽  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Keyword(s):  
Bioactive Glass ◽  
Scientific Community ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Citation Index ◽  
Citation Count ◽  
Imperial College ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Density Current ◽  
Article Title ◽  
The Web

AbstractCitation analysis of a certain publication acknowledges its impact on the scientific community. This study conducted a multivariate analysis of the top 50 most cited articles published on the field of Bioactive Glass. A systemic search was performed using the “All database” section of the Web of Science to retrieve the top 50 most cited original publications. The selected articles were then manually cross-matched with Elsevier Scopus and Google Scholar Database. Parameters such as article title, authorship, institution, country of publication, year, citation count, citation density, current citation index, and journal name were retrieved from Web of Science. Different ranges of citation numbers were retrieved for these publications in which 197-913 are from Web of Science, 209-962 are from Elsevier Scopus, and 269-1225 are from Google Scholar. A total of 153 authors contributed to this marked list, where Professor L.L. Hench contributed the highest number of articles (n=21). Imperial College London published the highest number of articles (n=21). In summary, this study provides a good scientometric picture of bioactive glass related publications, which illustrate the trend of biomaterials development over the years and suggests future scopes to the scientific community.

scholarly journals Evidence of Open Access of scientific publications in Google Scholar: a large-scale analysis

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Martín-Martín ◽  
Rodrigo Costas ◽  
Thed van Leeuwen ◽  
Emilio Delgado López-Cózar
Keyword(s):  
Open Access ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Scale Analysis ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Large Scale Analysis ◽  
Citation Indexes ◽  
Legal Forms ◽  
The Web

This article uses Google Scholar (GS) as a source of data to analyse Open Access (OA) levels across all countries and fields of research. All articles and reviews with a DOI and published in 2009 or 2014 and covered by the three main citation indexes in the Web of Science (2,269,022 documents) were selected for study. The links to freely available versions of these documents displayed in GS were collected. To differentiate between more reliable (sustainable and legal) forms of access and less reliable ones, the data extracted from GS was combined with information available in DOAJ, CrossRef, OpenDOAR, and ROAR. This allowed us to distinguish the percentage of documents in our sample that are made OA by the publisher (23.1%, including Gold, Hybrid, Delayed, and Bronze OA) from those available as Green OA (17.6%), and those available from other sources (40.6%, mainly due to ResearchGate). The data shows an overall free availability of 54.6%, with important differences at the country and subject category levels. The data extracted from GS yielded very similar results to those found by other studies that analysed similar samples of documents, but employed different methods to find evidence of OA, thus suggesting a relative consistency among methods.

scholarly journals 25 Years of Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics

2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15
Author(s):  
Jadwiga Siemiątkowska
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Current Activity ◽  
History Of ◽  
Source Of Information ◽  
The Web

Abstract The article presents an outline of the 25-year history of the journal “Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics”. The source of information was mainly the journal issues themselves. Attention was drawn to changes that the journal underwent over a quarter of a century and its relationship with the Institute of Geodesy and Geodetic Astronomy and later the Department of Geodesy and Geodetic Astronomy. Many issues were dedicated to materials from Polish conferences - those organised by the Institute and the international ones attended by the employees of the Institute, which was indicated in the section on the history of the journal. The second part of the article concerns the current activity and importance of the journal. Attention was paid to visibility of “Reports on Geodesy and Geoinformatics” in the domestic and foreign databases. Polish databases where the journal is indexed have been identified and briefly described. A separate issue is the evaluation of the journal, which forms a measure of its popularity among consumers. For this purpose, various parameters and biometrics indicators are used. The article used the Web of Science, Google Scholar and the Ministerial List databases for the assessment of the journal.

scholarly journals Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison

2015 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 787-804 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Wil Harzing ◽  
Satu Alakangas
Keyword(s):  
Web Of Science ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
The Web
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document