scholarly journals Verification of Ocean Wind Forecasts from Global Numerical Prediction Models in the Middle-East and North Pacific Routes

2014 ◽  
Vol 131 (0) ◽  
pp. 48-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun TANEMOTO ◽  
Teruo OHSAWA ◽  
Katsutoshi KOZAI ◽  
Shigeaki SHIOTANI
Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingwen Jin ◽  
Xiangtao Fan ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Zhuxin Xue ◽  
Hongdeng Jian

Coastal cities in China are frequently hit by tropical cyclones (TCs), which result in tremendous loss of life and property. Even though the capability of numerical weather prediction models to forecast and track TCs has considerably improved in recent years, forecasting the intensity of a TC is still very difficult; thus, it is necessary to improve the accuracy of TC intensity prediction. To this end, we established a series of predictors using the Best Track TC dataset to predict the intensity of TCs in the Western North Pacific with an eXtreme Gradient BOOSTing (XGBOOST) model. The climatology and persistence factors, environmental factors, brainstorm features, intensity categories, and TC months are considered inputs for the models while the output is the TC intensity. The performance of the XGBOOST model was tested for very strong TCs such as Hato (2017), Rammasum (2014), Mujiage (2015), and Hagupit (2014). The results obtained show that the combination of inputs chosen were the optimal predictors for TC intensification with lead times of 6, 12, 18, and 24 h. Furthermore, the mean absolute error (MAE) of the XGBOOST model was much smaller than the MAEs of a back propagation neural network (BPNN) used to predict TC intensity. The MAEs of the forecasts with 6, 12, 18, and 24 h lead times for the test samples used were 1.61, 2.44, 3.10, and 3.70 m/s, respectively, for the XGBOOST model. The results indicate that the XGBOOST model developed in this study can be used to improve TC intensity forecast accuracy and can be considered a better alternative to conventional operational forecast models for TC intensity prediction.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 671-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Sampson ◽  
John A. Knaff ◽  
Edward M. Fukada

Abstract The Systematic Approach Forecast Aid (SAFA) has been in use at the Joint Typhoon Warning Center since the 2000 western North Pacific season. SAFA is a system designed for determination of erroneous 72-h track forecasts through identification of predefined error mechanisms associated with numerical weather prediction models. A metric for the process is a selective consensus in which model guidance suspected to have 72-h error greater than 300 n mi (1 n mi = 1.85 km) is first eliminated prior to calculating the average of the remaining model tracks. The resultant selective consensus should then provide improved forecasts over the nonselective consensus. In the 5 yr since its introduction into JTWC operations, forecasters have been unable to produce a selective consensus that provides consistent improved guidance over the nonselective consensus. Also, the rate at which forecasters exercised the selective consensus option dropped from approximately 45% of all forecasts in 2000 to 3% in 2004.


2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1380-1393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parya Broomandi ◽  
Bahram Dabir ◽  
Babak Bonakdarpour ◽  
Yousf Rashidi ◽  
Ali Akherati

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document