scholarly journals Load & Resistance Factors Calibration for Sliding and Overturning Limit State Design of Perforated Caisson Breakwater

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 458-464
Author(s):  
Dong Hyawn Kim
2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 293-297
Author(s):  
Dong Hyawn Kim ◽  
Jungwon Huh

Calibration of load-resistance factors for the limit state design of front covered caisson breakwaters were presented. Reliability analysis of the breakwaters which are constructed in Korean coast was conducted. Then, partial safety factors and load-resistance factors were sequentially calculated according to target reliability index. Load resistance factors were optimized to give one set of factor for limit state design of breakwater. The breakwaters were redesigned by using the optimal load resistance factor and verified whether reliability indices larger than the target value. Finally, load-resistance factors were compared with foreign country’s code for verification.


2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon A. Fenton ◽  
D. V. Griffiths ◽  
Olaide O. Ojomo

The reliability-based design of shallow foundations is generally implemented via a load and resistance factor design methodology embedded in a limit state design framework. For any particular limit state, the design proceeds by ensuring that the factored resistance equals or exceeds the factored load effects. Load and resistance factors are determined to ensure that the resulting design is sufficiently safe. Load factors are typically prescribed in structural codes and take into account load uncertainty. Factors applied to resistance depend on both uncertainty in the resistance (accounted for by a resistance factor) and desired target reliability (accounted for by a newly introduced consequence factor). This paper concentrates on how the consequence factor can be defined and specified to adjust the target reliability of a shallow foundation designed to resist bearing capacity failure.


2005 ◽  
pp. 71-81
Author(s):  
Toyoji YONEZAWA ◽  
Masahiro SHINODA ◽  
Masaru TATEYAMA ◽  
Junichi KOSEKI

2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 1729-1741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrangiz Naghibi ◽  
Gordon A. Fenton

This paper investigates the ultimate limit state load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of deep foundations founded within purely cohesive soils. The geotechnical resistance factors required to produce deep foundation designs having a maximum acceptable failure probability are estimated as a function of site understanding and failure consequence. The probability theory developed in this paper, used to determine the resistance factors, is verified by a two-dimensional random field Monte Carlo simulation of a spatially variable cohesive soil. The agreement between theory and simulation is found to be very good, and the theory is then used to derive the required geotechnical resistance factors. The results presented in this paper can be used to complement current ultimate limit state design code calibration efforts for deep foundations in cohesive soils.


2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 1742-1756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon A. Fenton ◽  
Mehrangiz Naghibi

This paper investigates the probabilistic nature of ultimate limit state failures of deep foundations in purely frictional soils (e.g., sands). In so doing, the theory required to predict both the probability of ultimate limit state failure and the resistance factors needed to avoid this limit state are proposed. The proposed resistance factors are functions of site understanding and failure consequence, and the theory leading to these resistance factors is validated via Monte Carlo simulation of a two-dimensional spatially variable random field. In both the theory and the simulation, a pile is assumed to be placed vertically at a certain position in the soil mass, and the soil is sampled at various distances from the pile to come up with characteristic soil properties (namely friction angle) for use in the pile design. Agreement between theory and simulation is found to be very good. The theoretical model is then employed to determine upper bound geotechnical resistance factors, which can be used to complement current ultimate limit state design code calibration efforts. An example of such a calibration is presented.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document