scholarly journals Load & Resistance Factors Calibration for Front Covered Caisson Breakwater

2021 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 293-297
Author(s):  
Dong Hyawn Kim ◽  
Jungwon Huh
Keyword(s):  
Limit State ◽  
Load Resistance ◽  
Safety Factors ◽  
Reliability Indices ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Limit State Design ◽  
Target Reliability Index ◽  
Optimal Load ◽  
Partial Safety Factors ◽  
Caisson Breakwater

Calibration of load-resistance factors for the limit state design of front covered caisson breakwaters were presented. Reliability analysis of the breakwaters which are constructed in Korean coast was conducted. Then, partial safety factors and load-resistance factors were sequentially calculated according to target reliability index. Load resistance factors were optimized to give one set of factor for limit state design of breakwater. The breakwaters were redesigned by using the optimal load resistance factor and verified whether reliability indices larger than the target value. Finally, load-resistance factors were compared with foreign country’s code for verification.

scholarly journals Partial Safety Factors of Limit State Design

1991 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-116
Author(s):  
Takashi Chou ◽  
Takehisa Matsuda
Keyword(s):  
Limit State ◽  
Safety Factors ◽  
Limit State Design ◽  
Partial Safety Factors

Load and Resistance Factors for Progressive Collapse Resistance Design of Reinforced Concrete Building Structures

2011 ◽  
Vol 255-260 ◽  
pp. 338-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Wang ◽  
Feng Lin ◽  
Xiang Lin Gu
Keyword(s):  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Progressive Collapse ◽  
Building Structures ◽  
Safety Factors ◽  
Ultimate State ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Collapse Resistance ◽  
Load And Resistance Factors ◽  
Load Effects ◽  
Partial Safety Factors

Due to the absence of provision for the load and resistance factors in design codes in China, designers often quote the provisions which are given in criterion or guidance of other countries such as USA. However, the partial safety factors of the load are various in different criterions. Based on the reliability theory, the load and resistance factors for progressive collapse resistance design of building structures were determined in this study. Firstly the simplified format of design expression in the ultimate state was obtained according to the expression in routine structural design. Then the failure probability of a structure during design reference period was taken as the sum of the probability of all incompatible failure events in this period, and the objective reliability index of the structure could be obtained. Finally using trial-and-error procedure and JC method, reliability analysis was performed for structural members to obtain the partial safety factors of load effects and resistance and the coefficient for combination value of load effects in design expression in the ultimate state. In this paper the load and resistance factors for progressive collapse resistance design of reinforced concrete structures subjected to blast was calculated as an example, and the recommendation values were given for the application at last.

Partial Safety Factors Assessment of Pipes With a Circumferential Surface Flaw

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideo Machida ◽  
Hiromasa Chitose ◽  
Manabu Arakawa
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Resistance ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Limit State ◽  
Surface Flaw ◽  
Flaw Size ◽  
Material Strength ◽  
State Function ◽  
Safety Factors ◽  
Related Parameter ◽  
Partial Safety Factors

This paper describes the evaluation of partial safety factors (PSF’s) for parameters related to flaw evaluation of pipes which have a circumferential surface flaw, and proposes the important matter which should be pay attention in the setup of the safety factors used in flaw evaluation. PSF’s were evaluated considering randomness of flaw size, a fracture resistance curve (J-R curve) and applied loads using load and resistance factor design method (LRFD). The limit state function is expressed by fracture resistance (resistance-related parameter) and applied J integral (load-related parameter). The measure parameters in the reliability assessment are the flaw size and the J-R curve, and PSF’s of them are larger than those of applied loads. Since the material properties used in the flaw evaluation are generally set to the engineering lower limit of their variation (e.g., 95% lower confidence limit), variation of the flaw size is considered to have important role on flaw evaluation. Therefore, when setting up the safely factors used in Rules on Fitness-for-Service (FFS), it is necessary to take into consideration not only the influence of variation of loads or material strength but the influence of variation of flaw size.

Fatigue Design Margin Evaluation for Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels by Reliability-Based Load and Resistance Factor Method

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahiro Takanashi ◽  
Makoto Higuchi ◽  
Junki Maeda ◽  
Shinsuke Sakai
Keyword(s):  
Applied Stress ◽  
Limit State ◽  
State Function ◽  
Low Alloy Steels ◽  
Limit State Function ◽  
Safety Factors ◽  
Fatigue Data ◽  
Alloy Steels ◽  
Partial Safety Factors ◽  
Two Parameters

This paper discusses the margins of the design fatigue curve in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Codes Section III from a reliability analysis point of view. It is reported that these margins were developed so as to cover uncertainties of fatigue data scatter, size effect, and surface condition[1], but the reasons for them remain unclear. In order to investigate the physical implications of the design margin, a probabilistic approach is taken for the collected fatigue data of carbon and low-alloy steels. In this approach, these three parameters are treated as random variables, and an applied stress is also taken into consideration as a random variable. For the analysis, to begin with, a limit state function for fatigue is proposed. Next, reliability index contours of the design fatigue curves for carbon and low-alloy steels are obtained based on the proposed limit state function. The contours indicate that the margins 2 on stress and 20 on life do not provide equal reliability. The margin 20 on life is more conservative and the margin became a minimum near intersections of the design curves with margins 2 on stress and 20 on life. For practical applications, the partial safety factors (PSF) for the target reliability are computed for all materials and several levels of coefficients of variation (COV) of the applied stress. A sensitivity analysis of the PSFs clarifies that only two parameters, the strength (or the life) and the applied stress, are predominant. Thus, the partial safety factors for these two parameters are proposed in a tabular form.

Safety factors and limit states analysis in geotechnical engineering

1984 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. G. Meyerhof
Keyword(s):  
Geotechnical Engineering ◽  
Stability Conditions ◽  
Safety Factors ◽  
Limit States ◽  
Resistance Factors ◽  
Performance Factors ◽  
Load Factors ◽  
Partial Safety Factors ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Earth Retaining Structures

This paper outlines the ultimate and serviceability limit states in geotechnical engineering analyses. The magnitude of customary total and suggested partial safety factors in earthworks, earth retaining structures, excavations, and foundations is discussed. On the basis of comparisons between these safety factors and using recommended load factors on various types of loading, including water pressures, common resistance factors on cohesion and friction of soils and performance factors can be established together with some additional modification factors for particular stability conditions. The serviceability limit states of foundations and structures are briefly discussed.

In-Plane Creep Stability Design of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Arches Using Inverse Reliability Method

2013 ◽  
Vol 351-352 ◽  
pp. 1601-1604
Author(s):  
Wei Jiang ◽  
Da Gang Lu
Keyword(s):  
Limit State ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Safety Factors ◽  
State Equations ◽  
Stability Range ◽  
Good Efficiency ◽  
Reliability Indices ◽  
Inverse Form ◽  
Dependent Behavior ◽  
Reliability Method

An inverse first order reliability method (FORM) is presented to solve the safety factors for the in-plane creep stability of concrete filled steel tubular (CFST) arches. In the inverse analysis, the safety factors with or without considering the time-dependent behavior of concrete are introduced into limit state equations for the in-plane stability design of CFST arches. For different target reliability indices and steel ratios, the time-independent and time-dependent safety factors are solved. The results show that the inverse FORM is of good efficiency and applicability. The target reliability indices have little effect on the safety factors for the creep stability of CFST arches. The effects of steel ratios are significant which should be considered in design. For the commonly used steel ratios of CFST arches, the in-plane safety factors for creep stability range from 1.17 to 1.43.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document