scholarly journals PRACTICAL METHOD FOR LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTORS FOR USE IN LIMIT STATE DESIGN

Author(s):  
Yasuhiro MORI
2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 265-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordon A. Fenton ◽  
D. V. Griffiths ◽  
Olaide O. Ojomo

The reliability-based design of shallow foundations is generally implemented via a load and resistance factor design methodology embedded in a limit state design framework. For any particular limit state, the design proceeds by ensuring that the factored resistance equals or exceeds the factored load effects. Load and resistance factors are determined to ensure that the resulting design is sufficiently safe. Load factors are typically prescribed in structural codes and take into account load uncertainty. Factors applied to resistance depend on both uncertainty in the resistance (accounted for by a resistance factor) and desired target reliability (accounted for by a newly introduced consequence factor). This paper concentrates on how the consequence factor can be defined and specified to adjust the target reliability of a shallow foundation designed to resist bearing capacity failure.


2005 ◽  
pp. 71-81
Author(s):  
Toyoji YONEZAWA ◽  
Masahiro SHINODA ◽  
Masaru TATEYAMA ◽  
Junichi KOSEKI

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nafiseh Kiani

Structural reliability analysis is necessary to predict the uncertainties which may endanger the safety of structures during their lifetime. Structural uncertainties are associated with design, construction and operation stages. In design of structures, different limit states or failure functions are suggested to be considered by design specifications. Load and resistance factors are two essential parameters which have significant impact on evaluating the uncertainties. These load and resistance factors are commonly determined using structural reliability methods. The purpose of this study is to determine the reliability index for a typical highway bridge by considering the maximum moment generated by vehicle live loads on the bridge as a random variable. The limit state function was formulated and reliability index was determined using the First Order Reliability Methods (FORM) method.


Author(s):  
Ho Hyun Lee ◽  
Hae Sung Lee

<p>This proceeding presents the calibration process of load and resistance factors for the design of cable members under a gravitational loads-governed limit state adopting optimization scheme. In reliability-based bridge design code, although the cable members show various behavior depending on the structural types of bridges, a proper reliability level should be satisfied by the load and resistance factors. A cable is a nonlinear component, thus tension of it also shows nonlinear characteristics. In this study, the limit state function is linearized, and the tension of each load component is normalized by total nominal tension. With the purpose of performing code calibration independent of structural types of bridges, the normalized tensions are parameterized by three load ratios. The target reliability indices of cable members are determined considering results of reliability analyses of existing cable-supported bridges in South Korea, and a target strength, which satisfies the target reliability indices exactly, is evaluated. Optimization problem to minimize an error between the target strength and nominal strength, which is calculated by the load and resistance factors, is defined, and optimal values of the factors are calibrated. Reliability analyses for the strength calculated from the optimal factors are performed and it is verified that the factors can lead to the design with a uniform reliability level.</p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 48 (11) ◽  
pp. 1729-1741 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrangiz Naghibi ◽  
Gordon A. Fenton

This paper investigates the ultimate limit state load and resistance factor design (LRFD) of deep foundations founded within purely cohesive soils. The geotechnical resistance factors required to produce deep foundation designs having a maximum acceptable failure probability are estimated as a function of site understanding and failure consequence. The probability theory developed in this paper, used to determine the resistance factors, is verified by a two-dimensional random field Monte Carlo simulation of a spatially variable cohesive soil. The agreement between theory and simulation is found to be very good, and the theory is then used to derive the required geotechnical resistance factors. The results presented in this paper can be used to complement current ultimate limit state design code calibration efforts for deep foundations in cohesive soils.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 289-297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antanas Kudzys ◽  
Romualdas Kliukas

The expediency of using precast spun concrete columns of annular cross‐sections reinforced by high‐strength steel bars is discussed. Test material properties, efficiency factors and resisting compressive stresses of plain and reinforced spun concretes are presented. Modelling a bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded members of annular cross‐sections is based on the concepts of compression with a bending moment and bending with a concentrical force. The comparison of test and modelling data of concentrically and eccentrically loaded members is analysed. The expediency to use in design practice the approaches of current methods of partial safety factors design (PSFD) legitimated in Europe and load and resistance factors design (LRFD) suggested in the USA and other countries is considered and illustrated by a numerical example. Santrauka Aptariamas didžiastiprio plieno strypais armuotų žiedinio skerspjūvio centrifuguotojo betono kolonų naudotinumas. Pateiktos armuotojo ir nearmuotojo centrifuguotojo betono medžiagų savybės, efektyvumo veiksniai ir laikomieji gniuždymo įtempiai. Ekscentriškai gniuždomų žiedinio skerspjūvio elementų laikomajai galiai modeliuoti taikomos lenkiamojo gniuždymo ir gniuždomojo lenkimo sampratos. Analizuojamas centriškai ir ekscentriškai apkrautų elementų eksperimentinių ir modeliavimo duomenų sugretinimas, nagrinėjamas Europos, JAV ir kitų šalių projektavimo praktikoje įteisintų ir paplitusių dalinių veiksnių ir apkrovų bei atsparių veiksnių metodų taikymo tikslingumas, kurį rodo skaitmeninis pavyzdys.


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 1377-1392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Bathurst ◽  
Tony M. Allen ◽  
Andrzej S. Nowak

Reliability-based design concepts and their application to load and resistance factor design (LRFD or limit states design (LSD) in Canada) are well known, and their adoption in geotechnical engineering design is now recommended for many soil–structure interaction problems. Two important challenges for acceptance of LRFD for the design of reinforced soil walls are (i) a proper understanding of the calibration methods used to arrive at load and resistance factors, and (ii) the proper interpretation of the data required to carry out this process. This paper presents LRFD calibration principles and traces the steps required to arrive at load and resistance factors using closed-form solutions for one typical limit state, namely pullout of steel reinforcement elements in the anchorage zone of a reinforced soil wall. A unique feature of this paper is that measured load and resistance values from a database of case histories are used to develop the statistical parameters in the examples. The paper also addresses issues related to the influence of outliers in the datasets and possible dependencies between variables that can have an important influence on the results of calibration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document