Modelling the Generation of the Cochlear Microphonic

<p>The human ear is a remarkable sensory organ. A normal healthy human ear is able to process sounds covering a wide range of frequencies and intensities, while distinguishing between different components of complex sounds such as a musical chord. In the last four decades, knowledge about the cochlea and the mechanisms involved in its operation has greatly increased, but many details about these mechanisms remain unresolved and disputed. The cochlea has a vulnerable structure. Consequently, measuring and monitoring its mechanical and electrical activities even with contemporary devices is very difficult. Modelling can be used to fill gaps between those measurements that are feasible and actual cochlear function. Modelling techniques can also help to simplify complex cochlear operation to a tractable and comprehensible level while still reproducing certain behaviours of interest. Modelling therefore can play an essential role in developing a better understanding of the cochlea. The Cochlear Microphonic (CM) is an electrical signal generated inside the cochlea in response to sound. This electrical signal reflects mechanical activity in the cochlea and the excitation processes involved in its generation. However, the difficulty of obtaining this signal and the simplicity of other methods such as otoacoustic emissions have discouraged the use of the cochlear microphonic as a tool for studying cochlear functions. In this thesis, amodel of the cochlea is presented which integrates bothmechanical and electrical aspects, enabling the interaction between them to be investigated. The resulting model is then used to observe the effect of the cochlear amplifier on the CM. The results indicate that while the cochlear amplifier significantly amplifies the basilar membrane displacement, the effect on the CM is less significant. Both of these indications agree with previous physiological findings. A novel modelling approach is used to investigate the tuning discrepancy between basilar membrane and CMtuning curves. The results suggest that this discrepancy is primarily due to transversal phase cancellation in the outer hair cell rather than longitudinal phase cancellation along the basilar membrane. In addition, the results of the model suggest that spontaneous cochlear microphonic should exist in the cochlea. The existence of this spontaneous electrical signal has not yet been reported.</p>

Modelling the Generation of the Cochlear Microphonic

<p>The human ear is a remarkable sensory organ. A normal healthy human ear is able to process sounds covering a wide range of frequencies and intensities, while distinguishing between different components of complex sounds such as a musical chord. In the last four decades, knowledge about the cochlea and the mechanisms involved in its operation has greatly increased, but many details about these mechanisms remain unresolved and disputed. The cochlea has a vulnerable structure. Consequently, measuring and monitoring its mechanical and electrical activities even with contemporary devices is very difficult. Modelling can be used to fill gaps between those measurements that are feasible and actual cochlear function. Modelling techniques can also help to simplify complex cochlear operation to a tractable and comprehensible level while still reproducing certain behaviours of interest. Modelling therefore can play an essential role in developing a better understanding of the cochlea. The Cochlear Microphonic (CM) is an electrical signal generated inside the cochlea in response to sound. This electrical signal reflects mechanical activity in the cochlea and the excitation processes involved in its generation. However, the difficulty of obtaining this signal and the simplicity of other methods such as otoacoustic emissions have discouraged the use of the cochlear microphonic as a tool for studying cochlear functions. In this thesis, amodel of the cochlea is presented which integrates bothmechanical and electrical aspects, enabling the interaction between them to be investigated. The resulting model is then used to observe the effect of the cochlear amplifier on the CM. The results indicate that while the cochlear amplifier significantly amplifies the basilar membrane displacement, the effect on the CM is less significant. Both of these indications agree with previous physiological findings. A novel modelling approach is used to investigate the tuning discrepancy between basilar membrane and CMtuning curves. The results suggest that this discrepancy is primarily due to transversal phase cancellation in the outer hair cell rather than longitudinal phase cancellation along the basilar membrane. In addition, the results of the model suggest that spontaneous cochlear microphonic should exist in the cochlea. The existence of this spontaneous electrical signal has not yet been reported.</p>

Cochlear Microphonic and Summating Potential Responses from Click-Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in High-Risk and Normal Infants

Examination of cochlear and neural potentials is necessary to assess sensory and neural status in infants, especially those cared for in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) who have high rates of hyperbilirubinemia and thus are at risk for auditory neuropathy (AN).The purpose of this study was to determine whether recording parameters commonly used in click-evoked auditory brain stem response (ABR) are useful for recording cochlear microphonic (CM) and Wave I in infants at risk for AN. Specifically, we analyzed CM, summating potential (SP), and Waves I, III, and V. The overall aim was to compare latencies and amplitudes of evoked responses in infants cared for in NICUs with infants in a well-baby nursery (WBN), both of which passed newborn hearing screening.This is a prospective study in which infants who passed ABR newborn hearing screening were grouped based on their birth history (WBN and NICU). All infants had normal hearing status when tested with diagnostic ABR at about one month of age, corrected for prematurity.Thirty infants (53 ears) from the WBN [mean corrected age at test = 5.0 weeks (wks.)] and thirty-two infants (59 ears) from the NICU (mean corrected age at test = 5.7 wks.) with normal hearing were included in this study. In addition, two infants were included as comparative case studies, one that was diagnosed with AN and another case that was diagnosed with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL).Diagnostic ABR, including click and tone-burst air- and bone-conduction stimuli were recorded. Peak Waves I, III, and V; SP; and CM latency and amplitude (peak to trough) were measured to determine if there were differences in ABR and electrocochleography (ECochG) variables between WBN and NICU infants.No significant group differences were found between WBN and NICU groups for ABR waveforms, CM, or SP, including amplitude and latency values. The majority (75%) of the NICU group had hyperbilirubinemia, but overall, they did not show evidence of effects in their ECochG or ABR responses when tested at about one-month corrected age. These data may serve as a normative sample for NICU and well infant ECochG and ABR latencies at one-month corrected age. Two infant case studies, one diagnosed with AN and another with SNHL demonstrated the complexity of using ECochG and otoacoustic emissions to assess the risk of AN in individual cases.CM and SPs can be readily measured using standard click stimuli in both well and NICU infants. Normative ranges for latency and amplitude are useful for interpreting ECochG and ABR components. Inclusion of ECochG and ABR tests in a test battery that also includes otoacoustic emission and acoustic reflex tests may provide a more refined assessment of the risks of AN and SNHL in infants.