screen mammography
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

58
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1106) ◽  
pp. 20190610
Author(s):  
Sian Taylor-Phillips ◽  
Chris Stinton

In this article, we explore the evidence around the relative benefits and harms of breast cancer screening using a single radiologist to examine each female’s mammograms for signs of cancer (single reading), or two radiologists (double reading). First, we briefly explore the historical evidence using film-screen mammography, before providing an in-depth description of evidence using digital mammography. We classify studies according to which exact version of double reading they use, because the evidence suggests that effectiveness of double reading is contingent on whether the two radiologists are blinded to one another’s decisions, and how the decisions of the two radiologists are integrated. Finally, we explore the implications for future mammography, including using artificial intelligence as the second reader, and applications to more complex three-dimensional imaging techniques such as tomosynthesis.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Farber ◽  
Katy Bell ◽  
Nehmat Houssami ◽  
Kevin McGeechan ◽  
Sally Wortley ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Firas Dabbous ◽  
Therese A. Dolecek ◽  
Sarah M. Friedewald ◽  
Katherine Y. Tossas-Milligan ◽  
Tere Macarol ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 90 ◽  
pp. 206-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leng Dong ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Alastair Gale ◽  
Peter Phillips

2015 ◽  
Vol 205 (3) ◽  
pp. 676-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise M. Henderson ◽  
Diana L. Miglioretti ◽  
Karla Kerlikowske ◽  
Karen J. Wernli ◽  
Brian L. Sprague ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document