feeding selectivity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

118
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

29
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
pp. 185-215
Author(s):  
Nabil Majdi ◽  
Tom Moens ◽  
Walter Traunspurger

Abstract This chapter provides overview of the feeding habits and food sources of aquatic nematodes. The environmental constraints on feeding, food recognition, and feeding selectivity are also addressed, together with the complex, indirect trophic interactions between nematodes and their microbial prey. To raise awareness of the inherent methodological and/or interpretational problems in studies of nematode feeding ecology, the chapter ends with a brief look at the methods that have been adapted to quantify feeding rates in nematodes.


Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 2031
Author(s):  
Cui Feng ◽  
Mengqi Han ◽  
Chenchen Dong ◽  
Jingyi Jia ◽  
Jianwu Chen ◽  
...  

Mesozooplankton have been known to be important consumers of phytoplankton, and the community plays an important role in removing the primary production in the marine ecosystem. In the present study, mesozooplankton grazing on phytoplankton were studied in situ at two sampling stations (TM4 and TM8) in Tolo Harbour. HPLC analysis showed that diatoms were the dominant phytoplankton in the two stations throughout the year, and contributed on average to over 40% of total phytoplankton biomass. Dinoflagellates were the second most abundant group of phytoplankton in the two monitoring stations, while the contribution of haptophytes, green algae, cyanobacteria, and cryptophytes was negligible. Feeding experiments, combined with HPLC pigment analysis, were conducted to measure mesozooplankton selective feeding on phytoplankton. The results demonstrated that mesozooplankton displayed a clear feeding selectivity for phytoplankton in Tolo Harbour. Firstly, mesozooplankton showed strong preference for the phytoplankton with the size of 20–200 μm, which suggested that the grazing selectivity and grazing rates of mesozooplankton were affected by the size of the food particles. On the other hand, mesozooplankton assemblages in Tolo Harbour displayed significant feeding selectivity for diatoms, dinoflagellates, and cryptophytes over other types of phytoplankton. The three algae groups are all the major phototrophic components in marine planktonic communities, and they often cause red tides in the marine environment. These results, taken together, suggested that mesozooplankton should play an important role in the regulation of red tides.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Retno Hartati ◽  
AMBARIYANTO AMBARIYANTO ◽  
WIDIANINGSIH WIDIANINGSIH ◽  
MUHAMMAD ZAINURI

Abstract. Hartati R, Zainuri M, Ambariyanto A, Widianingsih W. 2020. Feeding selectivity of Holothuria atra in different microhabitat in Panjang Island, Jepara (Java, Indonesia). Biodiversitas 21: 2233-2239. Particle selectivity by deposit feeder sea cucumber Holothuria atra was an important concept in its feeding ecology. This species utilized the organic matter that coated sediment and detrital particles as food. Thus, particle size, organic matter, and microalgal biomass had been proposed as variables food resources along which niche separation could occur in optimal foraging strategy. This study was conducted in five microhabitats of different coverage of seagrass bed (P1-P4) up to the rubble area (P5) over a tidally variable depth range of 0,5-5m in Panjang island, Jepara. Twenty samples of sea cucumber H. atra were taken from defined microhabitat, along with samples of sediment underneath the sea cucumber. Granulometry of the particles ingested by sea cucumbers, total organic matter, and microphytobenthic biomass (as chlorophyll-a) found throughout their digestive tract (alimentary canal) and in the sediments was analyzed. Comparison of the contents and the rates of organic matter assimilation of the digestive tract with those of the microhabitat sediment were carried out. The results showed that H. atra fed on sediment underneath their body and it was revealed that there were strong (ƿ=0.833-0.876) to very strong (ƿ=0.945) positive relationship between grain size in the sediment and in their alimentary canal which showed their feeding selectivity of the sediment. H. atra also found to have efficiency in feeding by taking advantage of the high TOM content and high abundance of microphytobenthic organisms (presented as chlorophyll-a) in their natural microhabitats.


2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-252
Author(s):  
Jory Cabrol ◽  
Anaïs Fabre ◽  
Christian Nozais ◽  
Réjean Tremblay ◽  
Michel Starr ◽  
...  

Abstract Krill species play a pivotal role in energetic transfer from lower to upper trophic levels. However, functional feeding responses, which determine how food availability influences ingestion rates, are still not well defined for northern krill species. Here, we estimated and compared the functional feeding responses on natural communities of phytoplankton and mesozooplankton of two coexisting species, Meganyctiphanes norvegica and Thysanoessa raschii. We tested the influence of the presence of phytoplankton on the ingestion rate and the selectivity of both krill species when feeding on zooplankton prey. We performed a series of feeding experiments using increasing concentrations of natural phytoplankton (64 taxa; 2 to >50 μm) and mesozooplankton (28 taxa; ~100–2000 μm) assemblages and the latter in presence and absence of phytoplankton. Results revealed that both krill species exhibited a Holling type III feeding response on phytoplankton. However, T. raschii was able to exploit efficiently the highest phytoplankton concentrations. Our experiments highlighted that the presence of phytoplankton modified the functional feeding response on mesozooplankton preys of M. norvegica, but not that of T. raschii. Similarly, the presence of phytoplankton influenced the feeding selectivity on mesozooplankton preys, although both species showed contrasting selectivity patterns. In addition, we estimated the energy needs in relation to the daily rations. T. raschii satisfied its energy needs by feeding either on high phytoplankton concentrations or on low mesozooplankton densities, whereas M. norvegica did not cover its metabolic costs efficiently by feeding on phytoplankton only, even at high phytoplankton concentrations.


Author(s):  
Mayumi NITTA ◽  
Megumu FUJIBAYASHI ◽  
Souta AOMORI ◽  
Kunihiro OKANO ◽  
Naoyuki MIYATA
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-265
Author(s):  
Maria J. M. Ganassin ◽  
Augusto Frota ◽  
Carolina M. Muniz ◽  
Matheus T. Baumgartner ◽  
Norma S. Hahn

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document