maximal subalgebra
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 1250001 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALI REZA SALEMKAR ◽  
SARA CHEHRAZI ◽  
SOMAIEH ALIZADEH NIRI

Given a maximal subalgebra M of a finite-dimensional Lie algebra L, a θ-pair for M is a pair (A, B) of subalgebras such that A ≰ M, B is an ideal of L contained in A ∩ M, and A/B includes properly no nonzero ideal of L/B. This is analogous to the concept of θ-pairs associated to maximal subgroups of a finite group, which has been studied by a number of authors. A θ-pair (A, B) for M is said to be maximal if M has no θ-pair (C, D) such that A < C. In this paper, we obtain some properties of maximal θ-pairs and use them to give some characterizations of solvable, supersolvable and nilpotent Lie algebras.



2011 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 403-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
YU-FENG YAO ◽  
BIN SHU

AbstractLetL=H(2r;n) be a graded Lie algebra of Hamiltonian type in the Cartan type series over an algebraically closed field of characteristicp>2. In the generalized restricted Lie algebra setup, any irreducible representation ofLcorresponds uniquely to a (generalized)p-characterχ. When the height ofχis no more than min {pni−pni−1∣i=1,2,…,2r}−2, the corresponding irreducible representations are proved to be induced from irreducible representations of the distinguished maximal subalgebraL0with the aid of an analogy of Skryabin’s category ℭ for the generalized Jacobson–Witt algebras and modulo finitely many exceptional cases. Since the exceptional simple modules have been classified, we can then give a full description of the irreducible representations withp-characters of height below this number.



2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 531-542 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Towers

AbstractLet M be a maximal subalgebra of the Lie algebra L. A subalgebra C of L is said to be a completion for M if C is not contained in M but every proper subalgebra of C that is an ideal of L is contained in M. The set I(M) of all completions of M is called the index complex of M in L. We use this concept to investigate the influence of the maximal subalgebras on the structure of a Lie algebra, in particular, finding new characterizations of solvable and supersolvable Lie algebras.



2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 339-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsiu-Kwen Lee ◽  
Kun-Shan Liu


2003 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karl-Hermann Neeb ◽  
Ivan Penkov

AbstractLet V be a vector space over a field of characteristic zero and V* be a space of linear functionals on V which separate the points of V. We consider V ⊗ V* as a Lie algebra of finite rank operators on V, and set (V, V*) := V ⊗ V*. We define a Cartan subalgebra of (V, V*) as the centralizer of a maximal subalgebra every element of which is semisimple, and then give the following description of all Cartan subalgebras of (V;V*) under the assumption that is algebraically closed. A subalgebra of (V, V*) is a Cartan subalgebra if and only if it equals for some one-dimensional subspaces Vj ⊆ V and (Vj)* ⊆ V* with (Vi)* (Vj) = δij and such that the spaces . We then discuss explicit constructions of subspaces Vj and (Vj)* as above. Our second main result claims that a Cartan subalgebra of (V, V*) can be described alternatively as a locally nilpotent self-normalizing subalgebra whose adjoint representation is locally finite, or as a subalgebra h which coincides with the maximal locally nilpotent h-submodule of (V, V*), and such that the adjoint representation of is locally finite.





2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Carroll Guillory

We give several examples of Douglas algebras that do not have any maximal subalgebra. We find a condition on these algebras that guarantees that some do not have any minimal superalgebra. We also show that ifAis the only maximal subalgebra of a Douglas algebraB, then the algebraAdoes not have any maximal subalgebra.



1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 519-520
Author(s):  
Jesús Laliena

In a previous paper it is supposed that if A is a Bernstein algebra, every maximal subalgebra, M, verifies that dim M = dim A − 1. This is not true in general. Therefore Proposition 2 in this paper is not correct. However other results there, where this assertion was used, are correct but their proofs need some modifications now.



1988 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1807-1813 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. L. Leach ◽  
F. M. Mahomed


1988 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 735-741
Author(s):  
Carroll J. Gullory

Whenqis an interpolating Blaschke product, we find necessary and sufficient conditions for a subalgebraBofH∞[q¯]to be a maximal subalgebra in terms of the nonanalytic points of the noninvertible interpolating Blaschke products inB. If the setM(B)⋂Z(q)is not open inZ(q), we also find a condition that guarantees the existence of a factorq0ofqinH∞such thatBis maximal inH∞[q¯]. We also give conditions that show when two arbitrary Douglas algebrasAandB, withA⫅Bhave property thatAis maximal inB.



Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document