engineered skin substitutes
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

55
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Álvaro Sierra-Sánchez ◽  
Kevin H. Kim ◽  
Gonzalo Blasco-Morente ◽  
Salvador Arias-Santiago

AbstractWound healing is an important function of skin; however, after significant skin injury (burns) or in certain dermatological pathologies (chronic wounds), this important process can be deregulated or lost, resulting in severe complications. To avoid these, studies have focused on developing tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESSs), which attempt to replace and regenerate the damaged skin. Autologous cultured epithelial substitutes (CESs) constituted of keratinocytes, allogeneic cultured dermal substitutes (CDSs) composed of biomaterials and fibroblasts and autologous composite skin substitutes (CSSs) comprised of biomaterials, keratinocytes and fibroblasts, have been the most studied clinical TESSs, reporting positive results for different pathological conditions. However, researchers’ purpose is to develop TESSs that resemble in a better way the human skin and its wound healing process. For this reason, they have also evaluated at preclinical level the incorporation of other human cell types such as melanocytes, Merkel and Langerhans cells, skin stem cells (SSCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Among these, MSCs have been also reported in clinical studies with hopeful results. Future perspectives in the field of human-TESSs are focused on improving in vivo animal models, incorporating immune cells, designing specific niches inside the biomaterials to increase stem cell potential and developing three-dimensional bioprinting strategies, with the final purpose of increasing patient’s health care. In this review we summarize the use of different human cell populations for preclinical and clinical TESSs under research, remarking their strengths and limitations and discuss the future perspectives, which could be useful for wound healing purposes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. AB125
Author(s):  
Álvaro Sierra-Sánchez ◽  
Antonio Lizana Moreno ◽  
Ana Fernández-González ◽  
Olga Espinosa-Ibáñez ◽  
Antonio Martinez-Lopez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 2414-2427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Á. Sierra‐Sánchez ◽  
A. Fernández‐González ◽  
A. Lizana‐Moreno ◽  
O. Espinosa‐Ibáñez ◽  
A. Martinez‐Lopez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S78-S79
Author(s):  
Dorothy M Supp ◽  
Jennifer M Hahn ◽  
Christopher M Lloyd ◽  
Kelly A Combs ◽  
Viki B Swope ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Engineered skin substitutes (ESS) were developed to meet the need for prompt wound closure in patients with large full thickness burns. ESS containing autologous fibroblasts and keratinocytes were shown to provide stable wound closure in burn patients, but are limited by hypopigmentation. DNA damage caused by ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a known risk factor for development of skin cancer. In normal human skin, epidermal melanocytes provide pigmentation, helping to shield skin from UV-induced DNA damage. The current study investigated inclusion of human melanocytes (hM) and their role in the response of ESS to UV light in vivo. Methods Primary cells were isolated from skin of healthy de-identified human donors with IRB approval. Three groups of ESS were prepared with fibroblasts and keratinocytes, +/- hM, and were grafted orthotopically to immunodeficient mice: ESS without hM; ESS with light skin-derived (Caucasian) hM (ESS+hML); and ESS with dark skin-derived (African American) hM (ESS+hMD). After 8 weeks in vivo, grafts were irradiated with 135 mJ/cm2 UV, and mice were euthanized after 2 or 24 hours; non-UV treated mice served as controls. Pigmentation and erythema were measured with a Mexameter. Melanocytes and cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) were quantified by immunostaining with anti-TYRP1 and anti-CPD antibodies, respectively, followed by image analysis (Nikon Elements). Statistical analyses (SigmaPlot) utilized t-test or one-way ANOVA; P< 0.05 was considered significant. Results At 8 weeks post-grafting, mean hM density in ESS+hML and ESS+hMD was not significantly different from normal human skin samples. Pigmentation (in Mexameter units) before UV irradiation was significantly different among groups (ESS+hMD > ESS+hML > ESS no hM). UV irradiation did not increase erythema in any group, but resulted in significantly increased pigmentation in ESS+hML and ESS+hMD at 2 hours, but not 24 hours, post-UV. CPDs, the most prevalent form of UV-induced DNA damage, were significantly elevated 24 hours post-UV in ESS without hM. DNA damage was significantly lower 24 hours post-UV in ESS+hML and ESS+hMD compared with ESS without hM. No differences in DNA damage were observed between ESS+hML and ESS+hMD. Conclusions Pigmentation of ESS+hML and ESS+hMD in vivo varied according to the skin phototype of the hM donor, with no difference in melanocyte density, which was similar to normal human skin. Inclusion of either light or dark hM decreased UV-induced DNA damage, suggesting that hM in ESS play a photoprotective role, as in normal human skin. Applicability of Research to Practice Protection against UV-induced DNA damage may reduce the risk of skin cancer in patients grafted with ESS containing melanocytes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 751-760
Author(s):  
Dorothy M Supp ◽  
Jennifer M Hahn ◽  
Christopher M Lloyd ◽  
Kelly A Combs ◽  
Viki B Swope ◽  
...  

Abstract Engineered skin substitutes (ESS) containing autologous fibroblasts and keratinocytes provide stable wound closure in patients with large, full-thickness burns, but are limited by hypopigmentation due to absence of added melanocytes. DNA damage caused by ultraviolet radiation (UV) increases risk for skin cancer development. In human skin, melanocytes provide pigmentation that protects skin from UV-induced DNA damage. This study investigated whether inclusion of human melanocytes (hM) affects the response of ESS to UV in vivo. Specifically, pigmentation and formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), the most prevalent UV-induced DNA photoproduct, were analyzed. Three groups of ESS were prepared with fibroblasts and keratinocytes, ± melanocytes, and grafted orthotopically to immunodeficient mice: ESS without melanocytes (ESS-hM), ESS with light skin-derived (Caucasian) melanocytes (ESS+hM-L), and ESS with dark skin-derived (African-American) melanocytes (ESS+hM-D). Pigmentation of ESS+hM-L and ESS+hM-D increased significantly after grafting; pigmentation levels were significantly different among groups. Mean melanocyte densities in ESS+hM-L and ESS+hM-D were similar to each other and to densities in normal human skin. After 8 weeks in vivo, grafts were irradiated with 135 mJ/cm2 UV; non-UV-treated mice served as controls. UV modestly increased pigmentation in the ESS+hM groups. UV significantly increased CPD levels in ESS-hM, and levels in ESS-hM were significantly greater than in ESS+hM-L or ESS+hM-D. The results demonstrate that light or dark melanocytes in ESS decreased UV-induced DNA damage. Therefore, melanocytes in ESS play a photoprotective role. Protection against UV-induced DNA damage is expected to reduce skin cancer risk in patients grafted with ESS containing autologous melanocytes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 317-323
Author(s):  
F. W. Timmermans ◽  
E. Middelkoop

AbstractIn the last decades, skin substitutes have emerged as an important innovation in improving scar quality. They can be applied during the initial wound management but also during scar reconstruction procedures. This chapter provides an overview on the development, current state, and future of cell-seeded and tissue-engineered skin substitutes. We will discuss some of the most important varieties of skin substitutes in the context of scar formation and wound healing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S28-S28
Author(s):  
D M Supp ◽  
J M Hahn ◽  
K A Combs ◽  
K L McFarland ◽  
S T Boyce

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e0213325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Hahn ◽  
Kelly A. Combs ◽  
Christopher M. Lloyd ◽  
Kevin L. McFarland ◽  
Steven T. Boyce ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document