spinal control
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

43
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
René Lindstrøm ◽  
Alexander Breen ◽  
Ning Qu ◽  
Alister du Rose ◽  
Victoria Blogg Andersen ◽  
...  

AbstractSpinal control at intervertebral levels is dependent on interactions between the active, passive and neural control elements. However, this has never been quantifiable, and has therefore been outside the reach of clinical assessments and research. This study used fluoroscopy during repeated unconstrained flexion and return neck movements to calculate intersegmental motor control (MC), defined as the difference and variation in repeated continuous angular motion from its average path. The study aimed to determine control values for MC at individual levels and its variability. Twenty male volunteers aged 19–29 received fluoroscopic screening of their cervical spines during 4 repetitions of neutral to full flexion and return motion. Moving vertebral images from C0–C1 to C6–C7 were tracked using cross-correlation codes written in Matlab. MC for each level was defined as the mean of the absolute differences between each repetition’s angular path and their mean and its variability as represented by the SD. 1-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons were used to identify significant contrasts between levels. The mean MC differences and SDs were highest at C1-2, suggesting that this level has the least control and the most variability. Results at this level alone were highly significant (F-ratio 10.88 and 9.79 P < 0.0001). Significant contrasts were only found between C1-C2 and all other levels. The mean MC difference for summed C1-6 levels was 3.4° (0.7–6.1). This study is the first to quantify intervertebral MC in the cervical spine in asymptomatic people. Studies of neck pain patients are now merited.


2020 ◽  
pp. JN-RM-0816-20
Author(s):  
Jonathan Harnie ◽  
Johannie Audet ◽  
Alexander N. Klishko ◽  
Adam Doelman ◽  
Boris I. Prilutsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 597 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Etienne Desrochers ◽  
Jonathan Harnie ◽  
Adam Doelman ◽  
Marie‐France Hurteau ◽  
Alain Frigon

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Pascale Côté ◽  
Lynda M. Murray ◽  
Maria Knikou
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 1221-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elzbieta Jankowska

Despite numerous studies on spinal neuronal systems, several issues regarding their role in motor behavior remain unresolved. One of these issues is how electric fields associated with the activity of spinal neurons influence the operation of spinal neuronal networks and how effects of these field potentials are combined with other means of modulating neuronal activity. Another closely related issue is how external electric field potentials affect spinal neurons and how they can be used for therapeutic purposes such as pain relief or recovery of motor functions by transspinal direct current stimulation. Nevertheless, progress in our understanding of the spinal effects of electric fields and their mechanisms has been made over the last years, and the aim of the present review is to summarize the recent findings in this field.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 64-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gwyneth B. Ross ◽  
Peter J. Sheahan ◽  
Brian Mahoney ◽  
Brendon J. Gurd ◽  
Paul W. Hodges ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (11) ◽  
pp. A10.3-A11
Author(s):  
Felix Leung ◽  
Julie A Hides ◽  
Melinda M Franettovich Smith ◽  
Dilani M Mendis ◽  
Nigel A Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 258-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adri T. Apeldoorn ◽  
Hans van Helvoirt ◽  
Hanneke Meihuizen ◽  
Henk Tempelman ◽  
David Vandeput ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document