spin part
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

25
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajad Aghapour ◽  
Lars Andersson ◽  
Reebhu Bhattacharyya

AbstractThe duality-symmetric, Maxwell-like, formulation of linearized gravity introduced by Barnett (New J Phys 16, 2014) is used to generalize the conservation laws for helicity, the spin part of angular momentum, and spin-flux, to the case of linearized gravity. These conservation laws have been shown to follow from the conservation property of the helicity array, an analog of Lipkin’s zilch tensor. The analog of the helicity array for linearized gravity is constructed and is shown to be conserved.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (26) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvind ◽  
S. Chaturvedi ◽  
N. Mukunda

This paper analyses the algebraic and physical properties of the spin and orbital angular momenta of light in the quantum mechanical framework. The consequences of the fact that these are not angular momenta in the quantum mechanical sense are worked out in mathematical detail. It turns out that the spin part of the angular momentum has continuous eigenvalues. Particular attention is given to the paraxial limit, and to the definition of Laguerre–Gaussian modes for photons as well as classical light fields taking full account of the polarization degree of freedom.


2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Speranza ◽  
Nora Weickgenannt

AbstractThe relativistic treatment of spin is a fundamental subject which has an old history. In various physical contexts it is necessary to separate the relativistic total angular momentum into an orbital and spin contribution. However, such decomposition is affected by ambiguities since one can always redefine the orbital and spin part through the so-called pseudo-gauge transformations. We analyze this problem in detail by discussing the most common choices of energy-momentum and spin tensors with an emphasis on their physical implications, and study the spin vector which is a pseudo-gauge invariant operator. We review the angular momentum decomposition as a crucial ingredient for the formulation of relativistic spin hydrodynamics and quantum kinetic theory with a focus on relativistic nuclear collisions, where spin physics has recently attracted significant attention. Furthermore, we point out the connection between pseudo-gauge transformations and the different definitions of the relativistic center of inertia. Finally, we consider the Einstein–Cartan theory, an extension of conventional general relativity, which allows for a natural definition of the spin tensor.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 196-227
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Lake

Gedanken experiments in quantum gravity motivate generalised uncertainty relations (GURs) implying deviations from the standard quantum statistics close to the Planck scale. These deviations have been extensively investigated for the non-spin part of the wave function, but existing models tacitly assume that spin states remain unaffected by the quantisation of the background in which the quantum matter propagates. Here, we explore a new model of nonlocal geometry in which the Planck-scale smearing of classical points generates GURs for angular momentum. These, in turn, imply an analogous generalisation of the spin uncertainty relations. The new relations correspond to a novel representation of SU(2) that acts nontrivially on both subspaces of the composite state describing matter-geometry interactions. For single particles, each spin matrix has four independent eigenvectors, corresponding to two 2-fold degenerate eigenvalues ±(ℏ+β)/2, where β is a small correction to the effective Planck’s constant. These represent the spin states of a quantum particle immersed in a quantum background geometry and the correction by β emerges as a direct result of the interaction terms. In addition to the canonical qubits states, |0⟩=|↑⟩ and |1⟩=|↓⟩, there exist two new eigenstates in which the spin of the particle becomes entangled with the spin sector of the fluctuating spacetime. We explore ways to empirically distinguish the resulting "geometric" qubits, |0′⟩ and |1′⟩, from their canonical counterparts.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. V. Angelsky ◽  
A. Y. Bekshaev ◽  
P. P. Maksimyak ◽  
A. P. Maksimyak ◽  
C. Y. Zenkova ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. V. Angelsky ◽  
A. Y. Bekshaev ◽  
P. P. Maksimyak ◽  
C. Y. Zenkova ◽  
A. P. Maksimyak ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 11351 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. V. Angelsky ◽  
A. Ya. Bekshaev ◽  
P. P. Maksimyak ◽  
A. P. Maksimyak ◽  
I. I. Mokhun ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 3563 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. V. Angelsky ◽  
A. Ya. Bekshaev ◽  
P. P. Maksimyak ◽  
A. P. Maksimyak ◽  
S. G. Hanson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 36-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cahay ◽  
S. Bandyopadhyay
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Cahay ◽  
S. Bandyopadhyay
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document