cognitive diagnostic models
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

49
(FIVE YEARS 19)

H-INDEX

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Ling Hsu ◽  
Kuan-Yu Jin ◽  
Ming Ming Chiu

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Li ◽  
Wen-Chung Wang ◽  
Qin Xie

2019 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin Paulsen ◽  
Dubravka Svetina ◽  
Yanan Feng ◽  
Montserrat Valdivia

Cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) are of growing interest in educational research because of the models’ ability to provide diagnostic information regarding examinees’ strengths and weaknesses suited to a variety of content areas. An important step to ensure appropriate uses and interpretations from CDMs is to understand the impact of differential item functioning (DIF). While methods of detecting DIF in CDMs have been identified, there is a limited understanding of the extent to which DIF affects classification accuracy. This simulation study provides a reference to practitioners to understand how different magnitudes and types of DIF interact with CDM item types and group distributions and sample sizes to influence attribute- and profile-level classification accuracy. The results suggest that attribute-level classification accuracy is robust to DIF of large magnitudes in most conditions, while profile-level classification accuracy is negatively influenced by the inclusion of DIF. Conditions of unequal group distributions and DIF located on simple structure items had the greatest effect in decreasing classification accuracy. The article closes by considering implications of the results and future directions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document