binary matrix factorization
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

27
(FIVE YEARS 9)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. e0261250
Author(s):  
Osman Asif Malik ◽  
Hayato Ushijima-Mwesigwa ◽  
Arnab Roy ◽  
Avradip Mandal ◽  
Indradeep Ghosh

Many fundamental problems in data mining can be reduced to one or more NP-hard combinatorial optimization problems. Recent advances in novel technologies such as quantum and quantum-inspired hardware promise a substantial speedup for solving these problems compared to when using general purpose computers but often require the problem to be modeled in a special form, such as an Ising or quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO) model, in order to take advantage of these devices. In this work, we focus on the important binary matrix factorization (BMF) problem which has many applications in data mining. We propose two QUBO formulations for BMF. We show how clustering constraints can easily be incorporated into these formulations. The special purpose hardware we consider is limited in the number of variables it can handle which presents a challenge when factorizing large matrices. We propose a sampling based approach to overcome this challenge, allowing us to factorize large rectangular matrices. In addition to these methods, we also propose a simple baseline algorithm which outperforms our more sophisticated methods in a few situations. We run experiments on the Fujitsu Digital Annealer, a quantum-inspired complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) annealer, on both synthetic and real data, including gene expression data. These experiments show that our approach is able to produce more accurate BMFs than competing methods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajinkya Borle ◽  
Vincent Elfving ◽  
Samuel J. Lomonaco

The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) by Farhi et al. is a quantum computational framework for solving quantum or classical optimization tasks. Here, we explore using QAOA for binary linear least squares (BLLS); a problem that can serve as a building block of several other hard problems in linear algebra, such as the non-negative binary matrix factorization (NBMF) and other variants of the non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) problem. Most of the previous efforts in quantum computing for solving these problems were done using the quantum annealing paradigm. For the scope of this work, our experiments were done on noiseless quantum simulators, a simulator including a device-realistic noise-model, and two IBM Q 5-qubit machines. We highlight the possibilities of using QAOA and QAOA-like variational algorithms for solving such problems, where trial solutions can be obtained directly as samples, rather than being amplitude-encoded in the quantum wavefunction. Our numerics show that even for a small number of steps, simulated annealing can outperform QAOA for BLLS at a QAOA depth of p\leq3p≤3 for the probability of sampling the ground state. Finally, we point out some of the challenges involved in current-day experimental implementations of this technique on cloud-based quantum computers.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0244026
Author(s):  
John Golden ◽  
Daniel O’Malley

It was recently shown that quantum annealing can be used as an effective, fast subroutine in certain types of matrix factorization algorithms. The quantum annealing algorithm performed best for quick, approximate answers, but performance rapidly plateaued. In this paper, we utilize reverse annealing instead of forward annealing in the quantum annealing subroutine for nonnegative/binary matrix factorization problems. After an initial global search with forward annealing, reverse annealing performs a series of local searches that refine existing solutions. The combination of forward and reverse annealing significantly improves performance compared to forward annealing alone for all but the shortest run times.


2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1898-1935
Author(s):  
Alberto Lumbreras ◽  
Louis Filstroff ◽  
Cédric Févotte

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-33
Author(s):  
Haibing Lu ◽  
Xi Chen ◽  
Junmin Shi ◽  
Jaideep Vaidya ◽  
Vijayalakshmi Atluri ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 52 (24) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Mamadou Diop ◽  
Sebastian Miron ◽  
Anthony Larue ◽  
David Brie

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0206653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel O’Malley ◽  
Velimir V. Vesselinov ◽  
Boian S. Alexandrov ◽  
Ludmil B. Alexandrov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document