morphometry and stereology
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

17
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Vanessa de Freitas Ferreira ◽  
Fernanda Carolina Ribeiro Dias ◽  
Kyvia Lugate Cardoso Costa ◽  
Sérgio Luis Pinto Matta ◽  
Fabiano Rodrigues Melo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 1482-1494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Alberto Mandarim-de-Lacerda ◽  
Mariano Del-Sol

2013 ◽  
Vol 138 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 110-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana Cristina Silveira Alves de Melo ◽  
Tatiane Pires de Sousa ◽  
Kyvia Lugate C. Costa ◽  
Sérgio Luis P. da Matta ◽  
Fabiano Rodrigues de Melo ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e32636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Kielar ◽  
Stephen J. Sawiak ◽  
Paloma Navarro Negredo ◽  
Desmond H. Y. Tse ◽  
A. Jennifer Morton

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-17
Author(s):  
ML Miller ◽  
LR Gawenis ◽  
A Andringa ◽  
GE Shull

The late 1940s marked the appearance of the first publications using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and by 1950, with improved embedding and sectioning methodology, reports began to include mammalian tissues (PubMed). However, 15 years lapsed before morphometry and stereology were integrated into TEM studies (Loud 1965; Elias 1971; Weibel 1969). The utility of a quantitative approach to electron microscopy was obvious, but its popularity has waxed and waned considerably over the last half century; its staunch supporters, however, have stayed the course (Weibel 2001; Diaspro 2004). Early computers, though slow and unreliable, brought some degree of automation to morphometry in the 1980s, but did little to ease tedium or increase accuracy (Caruntu 2002).


2003 ◽  
pp. 451-458
Author(s):  
Michael J. Dykstra ◽  
Laura E. Reuss

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document