rectosigmoid resection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

66
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Keegan Guidolin ◽  
Andrea Covelli ◽  
Tyler R. Chesney ◽  
Arman Draginov ◽  
Sami A. Chadi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyoshi Kato ◽  
Kohei Omatsu ◽  
Sanshiro Okamoto ◽  
Maki Matoda ◽  
Hidetaka Nomura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and clinical usefulness of early oral feeding (EOF) after rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis for the treatment of primary ovarian cancer. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients who had undergone rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis for primary ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer between April 2012 and March 2019 in a single institution. Patient-related, disease-related, and surgery-related data including the incidence of anastomotic leakage and postoperative hospital stay were collected. EOF was introduced as a postoperative oral feeding protocol in September 2016. Before the introduction of EOF, conventional oral feeding (COF) had been used. Results Two hundred and one patients who underwent rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis, comprised of 95 patients in the COF group and 106 patients in the EOF group, were included in this study. The median number of postoperative days until the start of diet intake was 5 (range 2–8) in the COF group and 2 (range 2–8) in the EOF group (P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity was equivalent between the groups. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was similar (1%) in both groups. The median length of the postoperative hospital stay was reduced by 6 days for the EOF group: 17 (range 9–67) days for the COF group versus 11 (8–49) days for the EOF group (P < 0.001). Conclusion EOF provides a significant reduction in the length of the postoperative hospital stay without an increased complication risk after rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis as a part of cytoreductive surgery for primary ovarian cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suk-Joon Chang ◽  
Christina Fotopoulou ◽  
Robert E. Bristow ◽  
Dennis S. Chi ◽  
William A. Cliby

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyoshi Kato ◽  
Kohei Omatsu ◽  
Sanshiro Okamoto ◽  
Maki Matoda ◽  
Hidetaka Nomura ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the safety and clinical usefulness of early oral feeding (EOF) after rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis for the treatment of primary ovarian cancer.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients who had undergone rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis for primary ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer during a 7-year period. Patient-related, disease-related, and surgery-related data including the incidence of anastomotic leakage and postoperative hospital stay were collected. EOF was introduced as a postoperative oral feeding protocol during the middle of the study period. Before the introduction of EOF, conventional oral feeding (COF) had been used.ResultsTwo hundred and one patients who underwent rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis, comprised of 95 patients in the COF group and 106 patients in the EOF group, were included in this study. The median number of postoperative days until the start of diet intake was 5 (range: 2–8) in the COF group and 2 (range: 2–8) in the EOF group (P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity was equivalent between the groups. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was similar (1%) in both groups. The median length of the postoperative hospital stay was reduced by 6 days for the EOF group: 17 (range: 9–67) days for the COF group versus 11 (8–49) days for the EOF group (P < 0.001).ConclusionEOF provides a significant reduction in the length of the postoperative hospital stay without an increased complication risk after rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis as a part of cytoreductive surgery for primary ovarian cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-401
Author(s):  
Lea A. Moukarzel ◽  
Maureen E. Byrne ◽  
Stephanie Leiva ◽  
Michelle Wu ◽  
Qin C. Zhou ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document