TO EVALUATE EFFICACY OF LAPAROSCOPIC TRANSPERITONEAL PYELOLITHOTOMY FOR MANAGEMENT OF RENAL PELVIC STONES IN TERM OF POSTOPERATIVE HOSPITAL STAY

Background: To evaluate efficacy of laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of renal pelvic stones in term of postoperative hospital stay Methods: This study has been conducted in the Department of General surgery, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla on selected patients of Renal pelvis stones admitted in institution Results: Mean hospital stay was 6.66 days in laparoscopic group and it was 8 days in laparoscopic completed by open method. Maximum no. of patients was discharged within 5 days. 6 (75 %) patients returned to normal activity in less than 30 days which included only successful laparoscopic group and 2 patients returned to normal activity in 40 days which included lap completed by open group. Conclusion: In the present study of Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithotomy at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, the procedure showed a definite decrease hospital stay, early return to activity than who have undergone open surgery Keywords: Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Pyelolithotomy, Pelvic stone, Hospital stay.

Comparison of Intestinal Stent Placement Followed By Laparoscopic Surgery and Emergency Surgery in Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis and Meta-analysis

Background: For patients with colorectal cancer and malignant intestinal obstruction, it is still controversial to perform endoscopic intestinal stent placement followed by laparoscopic surgery. This study compares the endoscopic intestinal stent placement followed by laparoscopic surgery and emergency surgery in patients with colorectal cancer and malignant intestinal obstruction.Method: 11 compliant publications from Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase databases were analyzed using Revies Manager 5.2 software. SPSS 21 was used to retrospectively analyze 99 patients admitted to our center from 2014 to 2019.Results: There were significant differences between the two groups in three of the five criteria. In the SBTS group, the perioperative mortality rate was lower, with an OR of 0.46 (95% CI: 0.22-0.95, P=0.04), the incidence of postoperative wound infection was lower; OR was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.24-0.82, P=0.009); Postoperative hospital stay was shorter, MD was -2.07 (95% CI: -2.55--1.59, P<0.00001).Retrospective analysis of the clinical outcome differences between the SBTS group and ES group in our center: Compared to the ES group, the SBTS group displayed lower infection rate of surgical incision (χ2=3.94,P =0.04) ); no difference in the frequency of occurrence of anastomotic leakage (χ2=0.18,P=0.67), did not reduce perioperative mortality (χ2=0.94,P=0.33);shorter operating time (204.13±37.35 min) (t=5.08,P=0.000), lower intraoperative blood loss (155.65±94.90 ml) (t=3.90,P=0.001); and shorter postoperative hospital stay (12.91±5.47 d) (t=2.64, P=0.01).Conclusion: Compared the emergency surgery group, endoscopic intestinal stent placement followed by the laparoscopic surgery can reduce perioperative mortality, postoperative wound infection, intraoperative blood loss, and the length of postoperative hospital stay. There was no difference between the two methods as far as the incidence of posterior anastomotic leakage and operating time were concerned.

Efficacy of Neuroendoscopic Treatment for Septated Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Objective: Neuroendoscopic treatment is an alternative therapeutic strategy for the treatment of septate chronic subdural hematoma (sCSDH). However, the safety and efficacy of this strategy remain controversial. We compared the clinical outcomes of neuroendoscopic treatment with those of standard (large bone flap) craniotomy for sCSDH reported in our center. Furthermore, the safety and efficacy of the neuroendoscopic treatment procedure for sCSDH were evaluated.Methods: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of 43 patients (37 men and six women) with sCSDH who underwent either neuroendoscopic treatment or standard (large bone flap) craniotomy, such as sex, age, smoking, drinking, medical history, use of antiplatelet drugs, postoperative complications, sCSDH recurrence, length of hospital stay, and postoperative hospital stay. We recorded the surgical procedures and the neurological function recovery prior to surgery and 6 months following the surgical treatment.Results: The enrolled patients were categorized into neuroendoscopic treatment (n = 23) and standard (large bone flap) craniotomy (n = 20) groups. There were no differences in sex, age, smoking, drinking, medical history, antiplatelet drug use, postoperative complications, and sCSDH recurrence between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). However, the patients in neuroendoscopic treatment group had a shorter length of total hospital stay and postoperative hospital stay as compared with the standard craniotomy group (total hospital stay: 5.26 ± 1.89 vs. 8.15 ± 1.04 days, p &lt; 0.001; postoperative hospital stay: 4.47 ± 1.95 vs. 7.96 ± 0.97 days, p &lt; 0.001). The imaging and Modified Rankin Scale at the 6-month follow-up were satisfactory, and no sCSDH recurrence was reported in the two groups.Conclusions: The findings of this study indicate that neuroendoscopic treatment is safe and effective for sCSDH; it is minimally invasive and could be clinically utilized.

Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Cellular Immune Function and Postoperative Complications in Patients with NSCLC Undergoing Surgery

Objective We explore the effects of propofol and sevoflurane on the immunity and postoperative complications of patients undergoing thoracoscopic NSCLC radical surgery. Methods 61 patients were selected. They were divided into two groups. Patients take the same drugs for induction of anesthesia. Propofol was used for maintenance of anesthesia in Group P. Sevoflurane was used for another group. Hemodynamics and related anesthesia doses and laboratory data were recorded during the perioperative period. Immune Functio,, postoperative complication rate were evaluated in two groups. Results Comparisons of MAP and HR under anesthesia in patients, Group P were more smoothly than Group S at OLV 1h and TLV 30min. The recovery time and extubation time were significantly longer in the Group S than Group P. NEU: Group P were significantly lower at T3. LYM : Group P were significantly higher at T1 and T2. CD8+ : Group P were significantly higher at T1, T2 and T3. NK cells were significantly higher in Group P at T3. CD4+/CD8+: Group P were significantly lower at T2 and T3. The incidence of pleural effusion: Group P were significantly higher at T3. The postoperative hospital stays were significantly shorter in the Group S. Conclusions Propofol anesthesia has more stable hemodynamics and better resuscitation effect. The immune system of patients in the perioperative period was suppressed to varying degrees after surgery, and the propofol group was less severe than the sevoflurane group. Houever, the postoperative hospital stay depends more on whether postoperative complications occur.

Effectiveness of Postoperative Pain Management By Multimodal Analgesia Without Epidural Analgesia After Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background:Although epidural analgesia has been recommended for its strong analgesic effect for postoperative analgesia management, the increasing number of patients undergoing anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy to treat cerebrocardiovascular diseases cannot receive epidural analgesia given the risk of serious complications, including epidural hematoma. We aimed to evaluate the analgesic effects of multimodal analgesia involving intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA), and repeated scheduled acetaminophen administration, and block as local anesthesia, to establish postoperative analgesia management method replacing epidural analgesia in laparoscopic colectomy.Methods:We enrolled patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer at our hospital. The primary outcome was days of postoperative hospital stay. The efficacies of multimodal and epidural analgesia were compared. The secondary outcomes were the pain assessment and safety.Results:We registered 48 patients; among them, 40 patients were eligible. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 9.00 days (95% CI = 8.19 to 9.39, p < 0.0001). There were relatively high pain scores from postoperative day (POD) 0-1, which subsequently decreased and reach their lowest value at POD 4-5.Conclusions:Multimodal analgesia with IV-PCA and repeated scheduled acetaminophen administration could provide a safe and effective analgesic effect after laparoscopic colectomy and may be a postoperative analgesia management alternative to epidural analgesia.

Is Prophylactic Abdominal Drainage Necessary After Laparoscopic Colectomy For Colon Cancer? A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background: In 2018, the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommended against routine drainage after colorectal surgery. However, the evidence is relatively old and few studies were performed in low-to-middle income country (LMIC) setting. This study aimed to compare outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy with and without prophylactic drainage for colon cancer.Methods: A retrospective study was performed from 2018 to 2021 with patients who underwent laparoscopic colectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer. The use of prophylactic drainage was depended on routine practice of surgeons. Outcomes were postoperative complications and postoperative hospital length of stay. The drain and no-drain groups were compared using propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis.Results: The study included 143 patients (59 in the drain group and 84 in the no-drain group). The PSM resulted in 94 patients (47 in each group). Median age was 62 years. The most frequent was right hemicolectomy (33.6%), followed by left hemicolectomy (32.2%), sigmoid colectomy (21%), extended right hemicolectomy (9.8%), transverse hemicolectomy (2.1%), and total colectomy (1.4%). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the no-drain group (median of 5 versus 6 days). The no-drain group also had lower rate of complications (23.8% versus 30.5% and 23.4% versus 34% before and after matching respectively) and less severe complications based on Clavien-Dindo classification, but the difference was not significant.Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy without prophylactic drainage is safe in the treatment of colon cancer. This approach can shorten postoperative hospital stay and should be applied even in the LMIC setting.Main novel aspect: Laparoscopic colectomy without prophylactic drainage for colon cancer can be applied in low-to-middle income settings.

Laparoscopic right colectomy with intracorporeal ileotransverse anastomosis (results of the pilot study)

AIM: to evaluate the safety of intra- and extracorporeal ileotransverse anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.PATIENTS AND METHODS: a pilot «case-control» study included two groups of patients, who underwent laparoscopic right colectomy according to a standardized technique. An intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) was formed in the main group (n = 20), in the control group — extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) (n = 18).RESULTS: in main group the postoperative complications rate was 20%, in the control group — 28% (p = 0.71). The postoperative hospital stay in the main group was significantly less than in control (5.0 vs 7.3 days) (p < 0.001).CONCLUSION: the postoperative complications rate in both groups was not significant, but postoperative hospital stay was shorter in IA group. A randomized controlled trial is required.

A Respective Observational Study of Patients on Maintenance Hemodialysis Receiving Parathyroidectomy By Ultrasonic Scalpel

Background Secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) remains a common complication in many patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Kidney Disease Improve Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2017 guidelines suggest that parathyroidectomy (PTX) should be performed in severe SHPT patients with chronic kidney disease stage 3a-stage 5D. In the present study, we observed the efficacy of ultrasonic scalpel for PTX in SHPT patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Methods A total of 74 patients on maintenance hemodialysis who underwent PTX (34 with traditional electrocautery and 40 with an ultrasonic scalpel) were observed between August 2020 and August 2021 at Xiangyang Central Hospital (Hubei University of Arts and Science). Baseline demographic and clinic characteristics were collected pre- and post-PTX. Moreover, the postoperative complications and operation time were assessed between the two groups. Results The univariate analysis showed that there was no statistical significance in weight, dialysis duration, serum potassium, serum calcium, alkaline phosphate, triglyceride, and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) before and after PTX between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time in the ultrasonic scalpel group was significantly decreased compared with the traditional electrocautery group (P<0.05). Compared with the traditional electrocautery group, the drainage amount was significantly reduced in the ultrasonic scalpel group, and the number of days with drain and postoperative hospital stay were also remarkably decreased (P<0.05). In addition, a higher incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury occurred in the traditional electrocautery group, while the difference was not significant (P>0.05). Conclusions The use of ultrasonic scalpel significantly reduced the operation time and postoperative hospital stay in patients on maintenance hemodialysis undergoing PTX.

Inappropriate manipulation and drainage exacerbate post-operative pain and prolong the hospital stay after laparoscopic appendectomy for pediatric complicated appendicitis

Background This study examined whether drain placement or not is associated with the postoperative outcomes of pediatric patients following trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (TUSPLA) for complicated appendicitis. Methods The medical records of pediatric patients undergoing TUSPLA for acute complicated appendicitis from January 2012 to September 2018 in Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were reviewed retrospectively. They were classified according to whether they received passive drainage with a Penrose drain (Penrose group) (19), active drainage with a Jackson-Pratt drain with a vacuum bulb (JP group) (16), or no drain (non-drain group) (86). The postoperative outcomes of the three groups were compared. Results Postoperative visual analog scale pain score was significantly higher in the non-drain group than in either the JP group or Penrose group. Patients in the Penrose group had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay than those in the non-drain group and a higher rate of intra-abdominal abscess, while patients in the JP group had a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay; moreover, no patient in JP group developed a postoperative intra-abdominal abscess. Conclusions Compared to passive drainage with a Penrose drain or no drain, active drainage with a JP drain shorter the postoperative hospital stay and decreased the risk of postoperative intra-abdominal abscess.

The need for nutritional assessment and interventions based on the prognostic nutritional index for patients with femoral fractures: a retrospective study

Background The incidence of adverse perioperative outcomes in surgery for femoral fractures is high and associated with malnutrition. Here, we identified independent factors and assessed the predictive value of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) for perioperative adverse outcomes in patients with femoral fractures. Methods This retrospective study included 343 patients who underwent surgery for a single femur fracture. Demographic characteristics, surgery and anaesthesia records and blood test results at admission, 1 day postoperatively and before discharge were evaluated using logistic regression analysis. The discriminatory ability of the independent factors was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, and DeLong’s test was used to compare the area under the curve (AUC). Results Overall, 159 patients (46.4%) experienced adverse perioperative outcomes. Amongst these, 123 (35.9%) had lower limb vein thrombus, 68 (19.8%) had hospital-acquired pneumonia, 6 (1.7%) were transferred to the postoperative intensive care unit, 4 (1.2%) had pulmonary embolism, 3 (0.9%) died during hospitalisation and 9 (2.6%) had other adverse outcomes, including incision disunion, renal and liver function impairment, acute heart failure, acute cerebral infarction and stress gastroenteritis. The PNI at admission, age, postoperative hospital stay, time to admission, hypertension, combined injures and surgery type were independent factors for adverse perioperative outcomes. Based on the AUC (PNI at admission: 0.772 [0.723–0.821], P < 0.001; age: 0.678 [0.622–0.734], P < 0.001; postoperative hospital stay: 0.608 [0.548–0.668], P = 0.001; time to admission: 0.585 [0.525–0.646], P = 0.006), the PNI at admission had optimal discrimination ability, indicating its superiority over other independent factors (age vs. PNI at admission, P = 0.002; postoperative hospital stay vs. PNI at admission, P < 0.001; time to admission vs. PNI at admission, P < 0.001). Conclusions Patients with femoral fractures require a nutritional assessment and appropriate nutritional intervention at admission, and that the PNI value at admission may be a good nutritional assessment indicator.