scholarly journals Rectosigmoid resection during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: morbidity of gynecologic oncology vs. colorectal team

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Tozzi ◽  
Gaetano Valenti ◽  
Daniele Vinti ◽  
Riccardo Garruto Campanile ◽  
Massimo Cristaldi ◽  
...  
Cancer ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 123 (6) ◽  
pp. 985-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bunja J. Rungruang ◽  
Austin Miller ◽  
Thomas C. Krivak ◽  
Neil S. Horowitz ◽  
Noah Rodriguez ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (28) ◽  
pp. 3460-3473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexi A. Wright ◽  
Kari Bohlke ◽  
Deborah K. Armstrong ◽  
Michael A. Bookman ◽  
William A. Cliby ◽  
...  

Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction among women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer. Methods The Society of Gynecologic Oncology and the American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Four phase III clinical trials form the primary evidence base for the recommendations. The published studies suggest that for selected women with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreduction are noninferior to primary cytoreduction and adjuvant chemotherapy with respect to overall and progression-free survival and are associated with less perioperative morbidity and mortality. Recommendations All women with suspected stage IIIC or IV invasive epithelial ovarian cancer should be evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist prior to initiation of therapy. The primary clinical evaluation should include a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, and chest imaging (CT preferred). Women with a high perioperative risk profile or a low likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm of residual disease (ideally to no visible disease) should receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Women who are fit for primary cytoreductive surgery, and with potentially resectable disease, may receive either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreductive surgery. However, primary cytoreductive surgery is preferred if there is a high likelihood of achieving cytoreduction to < 1 cm (ideally to no visible disease) with acceptable morbidity. Before neoadjuvant chemotherapy is delivered, all patients should have confirmation of an invasive ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/NACT-ovarian-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .


2012 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bunja Rungruang ◽  
Austin Miller ◽  
Scott D. Richard ◽  
Chad A. Hamilton ◽  
Noah Rodriguez ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert E. Bristow ◽  
Stefanie Ueda ◽  
Melissa A. Gerardi ◽  
Onaopemipo B. Ajiboye ◽  
Okechukwu A. Ibeanu

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ayhan ◽  
R. A. Al ◽  
C. Baykal ◽  
E. Demirtas ◽  
A. Ayhan ◽  
...  

The purposes of this study were to compare the survival of ovarian cancer patients with splenic metastasis to patients without it and to evaluate the complications of the procedure.A retrospective study was performed on 34 patients with ovarian cancer who underwent splenectomy for initial cytoreduction at gynecologic oncology unit of Hacettepe University Hospitals between 1989 and 2001. All patients had FIGO stage IIIC disease and were left with <1 cm residual tumor after surgery. Eighteen patients (52.9%) had splenic metastasis. Patients with splenic metastasis tended poorer survival. Median survivals were 28.9 and 41.3 months for patients with splenic disease and for patients without it, respectively (P > 0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that performance status and histologic type influenced survival. Histologic type and performance status were identified as independent risk factors by multivariate analysis. Postoperative complications were developed in ten (29.4%) patients and three of these (8.8%) died in 1 month after operation. None of the complications was attributed directly to the splenectomy procedure.Complete surgical cytoreduction confers a survival benefit whether the parenchyma was involved or not. The splenectomy should be considered with its acceptable morbidity in selected patients who have a chance to achieve optimal debulking.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyoshi Kato ◽  
Kohei Omatsu ◽  
Sanshiro Okamoto ◽  
Maki Matoda ◽  
Hidetaka Nomura ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and clinical usefulness of early oral feeding (EOF) after rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis for the treatment of primary ovarian cancer. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all consecutive patients who had undergone rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis for primary ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer between April 2012 and March 2019 in a single institution. Patient-related, disease-related, and surgery-related data including the incidence of anastomotic leakage and postoperative hospital stay were collected. EOF was introduced as a postoperative oral feeding protocol in September 2016. Before the introduction of EOF, conventional oral feeding (COF) had been used. Results Two hundred and one patients who underwent rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis, comprised of 95 patients in the COF group and 106 patients in the EOF group, were included in this study. The median number of postoperative days until the start of diet intake was 5 (range 2–8) in the COF group and 2 (range 2–8) in the EOF group (P < 0.001). Postoperative morbidity was equivalent between the groups. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was similar (1%) in both groups. The median length of the postoperative hospital stay was reduced by 6 days for the EOF group: 17 (range 9–67) days for the COF group versus 11 (8–49) days for the EOF group (P < 0.001). Conclusion EOF provides a significant reduction in the length of the postoperative hospital stay without an increased complication risk after rectosigmoid resection with anastomosis as a part of cytoreductive surgery for primary ovarian cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document