prior publication
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

73
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-72
Author(s):  
Jacquline Gilson ◽  
Richard Kool

While the idea of inspiration spans the history of the field, inspiration as a topic has been an under-studied phenomenon in the interpretation field. Thirty-three professional interpreters from 21 agencies across North America participated in dialog on the topic of inspiration in interpretation through Internet-based World Café sessions. The dialog was rich and thoughtful, and revealed that these interpreters believed that inspiration is the goal of interpretation and that the nine characteristics of inspiration identified in the literature and reviewed in our prior publication were relevant to interpretation: that inspiration is two-sided, transmissible, positive, individual, transcendent, unexpected, holistic, requires receptivity, and receptivity may be cultivated. Identified barriers to using an inspiration-based approach in interpretation included meeting the needs of agencies, and particularly the agency’s needs for quantitative measurements of attendance and impacts.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabel M. Habicht ◽  
Mark Lutter ◽  
Martin Schröder

AbstractUsing a unique panel dataset of virtually all German academic political scientists, we show that researchers become much more productive due to the accumulation of human capital and third party funding. We also show however, that while universities of excellence have more productive researchers, individuals who go there do not become more productive. Finally, we show how women publish only 9 percent less than men with the same level of prior publication experience, but are about 26 percent less productive over their entire career, as early productivity leads to later productivity, so that women increasingly fall behind. These results cannot be explained through the influence of childbearing. Rather, they support the ‘theory of limited differences’, which argues that small differences in early productivity accumulate to large differences over entire careers, as early success encourages later success. Apart from generally showing why political scientists publish more or less, we specifically identify accumulative advantage as the principal reason why women increasingly fall behind men over the course of their careers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 167-205
Author(s):  
Mike Sutton

Patrick Matthew’s (1831) prior-publication of the complete hypothesis of natural selection “anticipated” Darwin’s Origin of Species by 28 years and Darwin’s and Wallace’s (1858) Linnean papers on the same topic by 27. Founded on the premise that no naturalist read it before 1860, Darwin’s and Wallace’s claims of duel independent discovery of Matthew’s hypothesis have been accepted by the scientific community. However, the central premise upon which those claims have been accepted — that no naturalist read Matthew’s ideas before 1858 — is a proven fallacy, because the famous and hugely influential naturalist Loudon reviewed Matthew’s book in 1832, commenting that it appeared to have something original to say on “the origin of species”. The fact that Loudon was a naturalist has been totally ignored until now. Furthermore, it is newly discovered that after reviewing Matthew’s book he went on to edit the journal that published two of Blyth’s highly influential papers on organic evolution. Blyth was Darwin’s most prolific and helpful correspondent on the topic. Further new discoveries reveal that, besides Loudon, whose work was well known to Darwin and his associates, six other naturalists read Matthew’s book and then cited it years before 1858. One, Selby, sat on several scientific committees with Darwin, and was a friend of his father. Selby went on to edit Wallace’s famous Sarawak paper on organic evolution. Another, Robert Chambers, a correspondent of Darwin, who met with him, went on to write the influential Vestiges of Creation, which both Darwin and Wallace admitted was an influence on their work. Undeniable potential knowledge-transfer routes did exist before 1858, therefore, between those who read Matthew’s ideas and commented upon them in the literature, and Darwin and Wallace. In light of the fact that influential naturalists, known to both Darwin and Wallace, did read Matthew’s original ideas before 1858, veracity in the history of discovery requires now an investigation into the possibility of cryptomnesia or deliberate pre-1860 plagiarism by Darwin and Wallace. In that regard, the notion of “knowledge contamination” is proposed and presented in a three-fold typology of escalating culpability for replicators of prior published work with citation. Future research in this area should turn to the neglected correspondence and private journal archives of those naturalists known to Darwin and Wallace who read Matthew’s ideas before 1860.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 45-55
Author(s):  
László Kovács

The compliance control of the application of negotiated procedures without prior publication is an activity of the Public Procurement Authority, where the Authority has a key role in influencing legal practice, furthermore, its option to initiate a review procedure has a considerable impact on drawing the borderline of the application of this procedure type. The number and ratio of negotiated procedures without prior publication has been lowering for years among the procedures launched by contracting authorities, likewise the transparency of Hungarian public procurements has markedly improved, which beside the legislation is also attributable to the fact that the Public Procurement Authority focuses in particular on ensuring the publicity of procedure documents and the decisions made as a result of the control. As the possibility offered by negotiated procedures without prior publication is indispensable for the satisfaction of certain procurement needs, consequently, in addition to strict compliance control, the establishment of a consistent legal practice is also necessary to implement this procedure type in the spirit in which it was conceived. The overview of past years’ legislative and practical tendencies in terms of negotiated procedures without prior publication presented by this article endeavours to analyse the background of decreasing statistical data and also to describe how the Public Procurement Authority ensures transparency during compliance control and how it supports practitioners in applying this procedure type in compliance with the provisions of the Public Procurement Act.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document