helmholtz equations
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

254
(FIVE YEARS 65)

H-INDEX

23
(FIVE YEARS 5)

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Heng Cheng ◽  
Miaojuan Peng

The improved element-free Galerkin (IEFG) method is proposed in this paper for solving 3D Helmholtz equations. The improved moving least-squares (IMLS) approximation is used to establish the trial function, and the penalty technique is used to enforce the essential boundary conditions. Thus, the final discretized equations of the IEFG method for 3D Helmholtz equations can be derived by using the corresponding Galerkin weak form. The influences of the node distribution, the weight functions, the scale parameters of the influence domain, and the penalty factors on the computational accuracy of the solutions are analyzed, and the numerical results of three examples show that the proposed method in this paper can not only enhance the computational speed of the element-free Galerkin (EFG) method but also eliminate the phenomenon of the singular matrix.


Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2215
Author(s):  
Haji Gul ◽  
Sajjad Ali ◽  
Kamal Shah ◽  
Shakoor Muhammad ◽  
Thanin Sitthiwirattham ◽  
...  

In this article, we introduce a new algorithm-based scheme titled asymptotic homotopy perturbation method (AHPM) for simulation purposes of non-linear and linear differential equations of non-integer and integer orders. AHPM is extended for numerical treatment to the approximate solution of one of the important fractional-order two-dimensional Helmholtz equations and some of its cases . For probation and illustrative purposes, we have compared the AHPM solutions to the solutions from another existing method as well as the exact solutions of the considered problems. Moreover, it is observed that the symmetry or asymmetry of the solution of considered problems is invariant under the homotopy definition. Error estimates for solutions are also provided. The approximate solutions of AHPM are tabulated and plotted, which indicates that AHPM is effective and explicit.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 113104
Author(s):  
Naresh Saha ◽  
Barnana Roy ◽  
Avinash Khare

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. Graham ◽  
O. R. Pembery ◽  
E. A. Spence

AbstractThis paper analyses the following question: let Aj, j = 1,2, be the Galerkin matrices corresponding to finite-element discretisations of the exterior Dirichlet problem for the heterogeneous Helmholtz equations ∇⋅ (Aj∇uj) + k2njuj = −f. How small must $\|A_{1} -A_{2}\|_{L^{q}}$ ∥ A 1 − A 2 ∥ L q and $\|{n_{1}} - {n_{2}}\|_{L^{q}}$ ∥ n 1 − n 2 ∥ L q be (in terms of k-dependence) for GMRES applied to either $(\mathbf {A}_1)^{-1}\mathbf {A}_2$ ( A 1 ) − 1 A 2 or A2(A1)− 1 to converge in a k-independent number of iterations for arbitrarily large k? (In other words, for A1 to be a good left or right preconditioner for A2?) We prove results answering this question, give theoretical evidence for their sharpness, and give numerical experiments supporting the estimates. Our motivation for tackling this question comes from calculating quantities of interest for the Helmholtz equation with random coefficients A and n. Such a calculation may require the solution of many deterministic Helmholtz problems, each with different A and n, and the answer to the question above dictates to what extent a previously calculated inverse of one of the Galerkin matrices can be used as a preconditioner for other Galerkin matrices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document