interspecies variation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

79
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley C Posch ◽  
Julia Hammer ◽  
Owen K Atkin ◽  
Helen Bramley ◽  
Yong-Ling Ruan ◽  
...  

Heat-induced inhibition of photosynthesis is a key factor in declining wheat performance and yield. Variation in wheat heat tolerance can be characterised using the critical temperature (Tcrit) above which incipient damage to the photosynthetic machinery occurs. We investigated intraspecies variation and plasticity of wheat Tcrit under elevated temperature in field and controlled environment experiments. We also assessed whether intraspecies variation in wheat Tcrit mirrors patterns of global interspecies variation in heat tolerance reported for mostly wild, woody plants. In the field, wheat Tcrit varied through the course of a day, peaking at noon and lowest at sunrise, and increased as plants developed from heading to anthesis and grain filling. Under controlled temperature conditions, heat stress (36°C) was associated with a rapid rise in wheat Tcrit (i.e. within two hours of heat stress) that peaked after 3—4 days. These peaks in Tcrit indicate a physiological limitation to photosystem II heat tolerance. Analysis of a global dataset (comprising 183 Triticum and wild wheat (Aegilops) species) generated from the current study and a systematic literature review showed that wheat leaf Tcrit varied by up to 20°C (about two-thirds of reported global plant interspecies variation). However, unlike global patterns of interspecies Tcrit variation which has been linked to latitude of genotype origin, intraspecific variation in wheat Tcrit was unrelated to that. Yet, the observed genotypic variation and plasticity of wheat Tcrit suggests that this trait could be a useful tool for high-throughput phenotyping of wheat photosynthetic heat tolerance.


Cell Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 110057
Author(s):  
Amanda L. Muehlbauer ◽  
Allison L. Richards ◽  
Adnan Alazizi ◽  
Michael B. Burns ◽  
Andres Gomez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Kazakou ◽  
Guillaume Fried ◽  
Pierre‐Olivier Cheptou ◽  
Olivier Gimenez

2021 ◽  
Vol 158 ◽  
pp. 103787
Author(s):  
Tamsyn B.W. Kiss ◽  
Xiaohui Chen ◽  
Mark E. Hodson

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shubhra Rastogi ◽  
Saumya Shah ◽  
Ritesh Kumar ◽  
Ajay Kumar ◽  
Ajit Kumar Shasany

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazakou Elena ◽  
Fried Guillaume ◽  
Cheptou Pierre-Olivier ◽  
Gimenez Olivier

AbstractOptimizing the effect of management practices on weed population dynamics is challenging due to the difficulties in inferring demographic parameters in seed banks and their response to disturbance. Here, we used a long-term plant survey between 2006 and 2012 in 46 French vineyards and quantified the effects of management practices (tillage, mowing and herbicide) on colonization, germination and seed survival of 30 weed species in relation to their seed mass. To do so, we used a recent statistical approach to reliably estimate demographic parameters for plant populations with a seed bank using time series of presence–absence data, which we extended to account for interspecies variation in the effects of management practices on demographic parameters. Our main finding was that when the level of disturbance increased (i.e., in plots with a higher number of herbicide, tillage or mowing treatments), colonization and survival in large-seeded species increased faster than in small-seeded species. High disturbance through tillage increased survival in the seed bank of species with high seed mass. The application of herbicides, considered as an intermediate disturbance, increased germination, survival and colonization probabilities of species with high seed mass. Mowing, representing habitats more competitive for light, increased the survival of species with high seed mass. Overall, the strong relationships between the effects of management practices and seed mass provides an indicator for predicting the dynamics of weed communities under disturbance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 315 ◽  
pp. 108871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ya-Qiao Wang ◽  
Xiao-Feng Shang ◽  
Lu Wang ◽  
Ping Zhang ◽  
Li-Wei Zou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda L. Muehlbauer ◽  
Allison L. Richards ◽  
Adnan Alazizi ◽  
Michael Burns ◽  
Andres Gomez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document