path integral formalism
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

132
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

20
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Söderberg

Abstract We consider two conformal defects close to each other in a free theory, and study what happens as the distance between them goes to zero. This limit is the same as zooming out, and the two defects have fused to another defect. As we zoom in we find a non-conformal effective action for the fused defect. Among other things this means that we cannot in general decompose the two-point correlator of two defects in terms of other conformal defects. We prove the fusion using the path integral formalism by treating the defects as sources for a scalar in the bulk.


2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 133-145
Author(s):  
Christian Platini Fogang Kuetche ◽  
Nsangou Issofa ◽  
Mathurin Esouague Ateuafack ◽  
Lukong Cornelius Fai

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karthik Rajeev

AbstractWe consider the backreaction of a quantum system q on an effectively classical degree of freedom C that is interacting with it. The backreaction equation based on the standard path integral formalism gives the so-called ‘in-out’ backreaction equation, which has several serious pathologies. One can use a different backreaction prescription, referred to as the ‘in-in’ approach, which resolves all the issues of ‘in-out’ backreaction equation. However, this procedure is usually invoked in a rather ad hoc manner. Here we provide a rigorous path integral derivation of the ‘in-in’ approach by exploiting the concept of quantum evolution along complex time contours. It turns out that, this approach can also be used to study both the ‘in-in’ and ‘in-out’ backreaction equations in a unified manner.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (26) ◽  
pp. 1950150
Author(s):  
Mohammad Walid AlMasri

We calculate the [Formula: see text](1) axial-anomaly in two and four dimensions using a modified path integral method coupled to a Pauli–Villars regulator field in the noncommutative QED. Pauli–Villars regularization method provides us with unambiguous way to connect the modified path integral formalism with perturbative axial Ward identities at each step of calculations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kourosh Nozari ◽  
M. Hajebrahimi ◽  
M. Khodadi ◽  
A. Etemadi

Author(s):  
Mohammad Jamali ◽  
Mehdi Golshani ◽  
Yousef Jamali

In quantum approaches to consciousness, the authors try to propose a model and mechanism for the mind-brain interaction using modern physics and some quantum concepts which do not exist in the classical physics. The independent effect of mind on the brain has been one of the challenging issues in the history of science and philosophy. In some recent mind-brain interaction models, the direct influence of mind on matter is either not accepted (as in Stapp’s model) or not clear, and there have not been any clear mechanism for it (as in Penrose-Hameroff’s model or in Eccles’s model). In this manuscript we propose a model and mechanism for mind’s effect on the matter using an extended Bohmian quantum mechanics and Avicenna’s ideas. We show that mind and mental states can affect brain’s activity without any violation of physical laws. This is a mathematical and descriptive model which shows the possibility of providing a causal model for mind’s effect on matter. It is shown that this model guarantees the realistic philosophical constraints and respects the laws of nature. In addition, it is shown that it is in agreement with the Libet style experimental results and parapsychological data. To propose this model, we obtained a modified (non-unitary) Schrödinger equation via second quantization method which affects the particle through a modified quantum potential and a new term in the continuity equation. At the second quantized level, which is equivalent to quantum field theory level (QFT), we can use the path integral formalism of Feynman. We show that there are three methods to extend Bohmian QM via path integral formalism, which has different interpretations. By numerical simulation of trajectories in the two-slits experiment, we show their differences and choose one of these methods for our mind-brain model which can be the basis for explaining some phenomena which are not possible to explain in the standard Bohmian QM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document