elbow trauma
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

117
(FIVE YEARS 25)

H-INDEX

18
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Mücahit GÜNAYDIN ◽  
Vildan ÖZER ◽  
Yunus KARACA ◽  
Ali AYGUN ◽  
Özgür TATLI ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi YANO ◽  
Yasunori KANESHIRO ◽  
Megumi ISHIKO ◽  
Seungho HYUN ◽  
Hideki SAKANAKA

CJEM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack G. Underschultz ◽  
Andrew Stagg ◽  
Cameron K. MacGougan

Author(s):  
Nicholas M. Beckmann ◽  
Kimberley N. Brown
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jeffrey M. Henstenburg ◽  
Matthew Sherman ◽  
Asif M. Ilyas

Abstract Introduction Heterotopic ossification (HO) can be a potentially serious and devastating complication following traumatic injury to the elbow. HO prophylaxis options include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and radiation therapy (RT) but neither has been proven more effective. The purpose of this review is to compare effectiveness and outcomes between NSAID and RT prophylaxis for HO about the elbow following a traumatic injury. Materials and Methods We performed a systematic review of PubMed and Cochrane Library for cases of HO prophylaxis following elbow trauma utilizing PRISMA guidelines to determine the most effective form of prophylaxis. Outcomes of interest included recurrence of HO, range of motion (ROM), and Mayo elbow performance index (MEPI). A total of 36 articles and 826 elbows of which 203 received RT and 623 received NSAID were identified and included in the final analysis. Results Rates of HO formation or recurrence following elbow trauma were similar between radiation and NSAID prophylaxis (15.6% vs. 22.2%, respectively p = 0.457). ROM was similar in flexion and extension arc (109.0 degrees in radiation vs. 112.8 in NSAIDs, p = 0.459) and in pronation and supination arc (118.9 degrees radiation vs. 134.7 degrees NSAIDs, p = 0.322). MEPI scores were 79.19 in the radiation group and 88.82 in the NSAIDs group at the final follow-up. Conclusion There is no statistical difference in HO development, recurrence, or final ROM between NSAIDs and RT prophylaxis following trauma to the elbow. We recommend the choice of modality based on patient characteristics, cost, and surgeon preference. Level of Evidence Level III.


2020 ◽  
Vol 13(62) (2) ◽  
pp. 211-218
Author(s):  
F. NECHITA

This paper presents the most effective ways of early and systematic application of kinetotherapy means and procedures to re-educate the functionality of the elbow. Movement therapy comes into action simultaneously with the other recovery means, within the general therapeutic plan, without excluding other therapies. The treatment of medial epicondylitis caused by overuse of the forearm muscles is a concern for the functional recovery of the elbow. The treatment of functional recovery of the elbow through physiotherapy is based on the functional re-education for the fastest return to the daily activities and sports of the patient. In addition to its curative role, physiotherapy, influencing a series of pathophysiological links, also has a preventive action, by improving the muscle tone of the arm, toning both the muscles of the forearm and the arm and stretching the epicondylis elbow tendons.


2020 ◽  
pp. 175857322097702
Author(s):  
Giles Faria ◽  
Siddharth Virani ◽  
Mohammed Shaeir ◽  
Patricia Velazquez-Ruta ◽  
Baha John Tadros ◽  
...  

Introduction COVID-19 has had a significant impact on healthcare systems. We aim to quantify the impact of this outbreak on shoulder and elbow trauma in our institution. Methods We prospectively collected data on patients presenting to our hospital with shoulder and elbow injuries during COVID-19. This included the number of attendances to the emergency department, fracture clinic, inpatient admissions and operative treatments. This was compared to a pre-COVID-19 period. We also assessed the efficacy of telephone clinics. Results There has been a noticeable decrease in the number of emergency department and fracture clinic attendances with upper limb complaints. The number of in-person fracture clinic reviews also decreased, with a reciprocal exponential increase in telephone consultations. We recorded a decrease in the number of shoulder and elbow trauma procedures performed. There was a small increase in the proportion of injuries treated conservatively during COVID-19. Our telephone clinics yielded a diagnosis and management plan in many cases and patient perspective appeared favourable. Conclusion We have noted significant change in the upper limb caseload. Certain injuries have reduced, likely due to COVID-19 lockdown. Moreover, we consider several changes to current practices could be taken forward after the pandemic.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document