hypotensive anaesthesia
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

140
(FIVE YEARS 13)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (34) ◽  
pp. 3174-3179
Author(s):  
Mydhili K ◽  
Sreehari K.G ◽  
Vijayakumari Y ◽  
Tanuja T.V.L.

BACKGROUND Bleeding during functional endoscopy sinus surgery (FESS) remains a main consideration. Even a small amount of blood may disturb the endoscopic view, increasing the likelihood of complications. So, we decided to compare the effects of clonidine and atenolol as oral premedication for hypotensive anaesthesia in patients undergoing FESS under general anaesthesia. The purpose of this study was to analyse and compare the efficacy of oral atenolol versus oral clonidine as premedication under general anaesthesia for induced hypotension in patients undergoing a functional endoscopic sinus surgery. METHODS The study included total 100 patients of age (18 – 60 years) [American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA grade I and II)] who were randomly divided into two groups of 50 each. Group - A (n = 50), a non-labelled clonidine tablet PO was given to the patients in the clonidine group in the dose of 2 mcg/kg at 7 pm the day before surgery and 4 mcg/kg two hours before surgery. Group - B (n = 50), a non-labelled atenolol 25 mg tablet was given PO to the patients in the atenolol group at 7 pm the day before surgery and also 2 hours before surgery. Induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia was performed by the same standard protocol for both groups. Hemodynamic effects [heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), quality of surgical field, intraoperative complications, and post anaesthetic discharge score system (PADSS)] were recorded and statistically analysed. RESULTS The hemodynamic stability and good quality surgical field was obtained in both the groups. The lesser incidence of intraoperative complications recorded with atenolol gives it a more favourable profile when compared to clonidine. CONCLUSIONS We conclude that both oral clonidine and atenolol premedication provides superior and predictable perioperative hemodynamic control, reduces the requirement of hypotensive agents, and produces acceptable recovery characteristics. The lesser incidence of intraoperative complications recorded with atenolol gives it a more favourable profile when compared to clonidine. KEYWORDS Atenolol, Clonidine, Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS)


2021 ◽  
pp. 133-135
Author(s):  
T.M. Craft ◽  
P.M. Upton

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 5206-5213
Author(s):  
Sudarssan Subramaniam Gouthaman ◽  
Janani Kandamani ◽  
Divya Sanjeevi Ramakrishnan ◽  
P. U. Abdul Wahab

Rhinoplasty is one frequent surgical procedure of many technical variations that only a few surgeons are considered to have mastered its broad scope. Operative site bleeding is considered to be an exasperating issue in the surgical procedure of rhinoplasty. Over the past few decades, the strategy of lowering patient's blood pressure during anaesthesia or "Hypotensive anaesthesia" has been practised to reduce the blood loss during surgeries. Clonidine is an antihypertensive drug and is suggested to have advantageous effects in controlling the intraoperative blood loss. The objective of this systematic review was to explore and study the existing literature and determine the efficacy of oral clonidine as a premedication in reducing the intraoperative blood loss in rhinoplasty surgeries. Data was gathered from electronic databases like PubMed, Medline and Cochrane central library. An additional manual search was performed with various journals to look for available articles to include in the systematic review. Only those studies which met the criteria for inclusion were selected. All studies and reports that evaluated oral clonidine with placebo in reducing bleeding during rhinoplasty surgery were included. Pertinent literature abstracts and full-text articles pertaining to the query were analysed. Two articles in total were taken in for qualitative analysis, both of which were randomised clinical trials. Oral clonidine shows significantly more efficient in reducing intraoperative bleeding than the placebo group. Premedication with oral clonidine is significantly effective in controlling blood loss during the surgical procedure of rhinoplasty.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 581-586
Author(s):  
V Y Srinivas ◽  
◽  
Meena Paul. P ◽  
Jyothsna Gopinathank N K ◽  
Harikrishnan K.V ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
Sbaihat , Ahmad ◽  
Abu Nahleh , Eyad ◽  
Khassawneh , Jawad M. F. ◽  
Kheir , Hamzah ◽  
Bani-Ata , Fatin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document