fuzzy portfolio selection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

74
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
pp. 107582
Author(s):  
Ludmila Dymova ◽  
Krzysztof Kaczmarek ◽  
Pavel Sevastjanov

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (TNEA) ◽  
pp. 1-25
Author(s):  
Judith Jazmin Castro Pérez ◽  
José Eduardo Medina Reyes

The objective of this research is to compare the returns of the portfolios developed by the proposed methodology called Fuzzy Portfolio Selection with Sugeno Type Fuzzy Neural Network against Markowitz’s portfolio theory; to identify the best investment model. For this purpose, we used ten stock time series of the Mexican market in daily format from January 2, 2015, to May 15, 2020, to get the portfolios every week from May 15 to June 12, 2020. The principal result is that our methodology recognized the behavior of each share, generates better risk management, and higher returns in comparison with the traditional techniques. The recommendation is to evaluate other stocks and markets to verify the efficiency of our model, the limitation is that a fundamental analysis must precede the tool, and the originality is the new technique proposed. The main conclusion is that the portfolio selection model based on fuzzy neural networks generated two models that do not have negative returns in any week, the cumulative return obtained was up to 15.68%.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Xue Deng ◽  
Chuangjie Chen

Considering that most studies have taken the investors’ preference for risk into account but ignored the investors’ preference for assets, in this paper, we combine the prospect theory and possibility theory to provide investors with a portfolio strategy that meets investors’ preference for assets. Firstly, a novel reference point is proposed to give investors a comprehensive impression of assets. Secondly, the prospect return rate of assets is quantified as trapezoidal fuzzy number, and its possibilistic mean value and variance are regarded as prospect return and risk and then used to define the fuzzy prospect value. This new definition is presented to denote the score of an asset in investors’ subjective cognition. And then, a prospect asset filtering frame is proposed to help investors select assets according to their preference. When assets are selected, another new definition called prospect consistency coefficient is proposed to measure the deviation of a portfolio strategy from investors’ preference. Some properties of the definition are presented by rigorous mathematical proof. Based on the definition and its properties, a possibilistic model is constructed, which can not only provide investors optimal strategies to make profit and reduce risk as much as possible, but also ensure that the deviation between the strategies and investors’ preference is tolerable. Finally, a numerical example is given to validate the proposed method, and the sensitivity analysis of parameters in prospect value function and prospect consistency constraint is conducted to help investors choose appropriate values according to their preferences. The results show that compared with the general M-V model, our model can not only better satisfy investors’ preference for assets, but also disperse risk effectively.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Deng ◽  
Weimin Li

Purpose This paper aims to propose two portfolio selection models with hesitant value-at-risk (HVaR) – HVaR fuzzy portfolio selection model (HVaR-FPSM) and HVaR-score fuzzy portfolio selection model (HVaR-S-FPSM) – to help investors solve the problem that how bad a portfolio can be under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. Design/methodology/approach It is strictly proved that the higher the probability threshold, the higher the HVaR in HVaR-S-FPSM. Numerical examples and a case study are used to illustrate the steps of building the proposed models and the importance of the HVaR and score constraint. In case study, the authors conduct a sensitivity analysis and compare the proposed models with decision-making models and hesitant fuzzy portfolio models. Findings The score constraint can make sure that the portfolio selected is profitable, but will not cause the HVaR to decrease dramatically. The investment proportions of stocks are mainly affected by their HVaRs, which is consistent with the fact that the stock having good performance is usually desirable in portfolio selection. The HVaR-S-FPSM can find portfolios with higher HVaR than each single stock and has little sacrifice of extreme returns. Originality/value This paper fulfills a need to construct portfolio selection models with HVaR under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment. As a downside risk, the HVaR is more consistent with investors’ intuitions about risks. Moreover, the score constraint makes sure that undesirable portfolios will not be selected.


Entropy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 932
Author(s):  
Krzysztof Kaczmarek ◽  
Ludmila Dymova ◽  
Pavel Sevastjanov

In this paper, first we show that the variance used in the Markowitz’s mean-variance model for the portfolio selection with its numerous modifications often does not properly present the risk of portfolio. Therefore, we propose another treating of portfolio risk as the measure of possibility to earn unacceptable low profits of portfolio and a simple mathematical formalization of this measure. In a similar way, we treat the criterion of portfolio’s return maximization as the measure of possibility to get a maximal profit. As the result, we formulate the portfolio selection problem as a bicriteria optimization task. Then, we study the properties of the developed approach using critical examples of portfolios with interval and fuzzy valued returns. The α-cuts representation of fuzzy returns was used. To validate the proposed method, we compare the results we got using it with those obtained with the use of fuzzy versions of seven widely reputed methods for portfolio selection. As in our approach we deal with the bicriteria task, the three most popular methods for local criteria aggregation are compared using the known example of fuzzy portfolio consist of five assets. It is shown that the results we got using our approach to the interval and fuzzy portfolio selection reflect better the essence of this task than those obtained by widely reputed traditional methods for portfolio selection in the fuzzy setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (22) ◽  
pp. 17167-17186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashed Khanjani Shiraz ◽  
Madjid Tavana ◽  
Hirofumi Fukuyama

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document