judgments of relative direction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Cognition ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 104559
Author(s):  
Phillip M. Newman ◽  
Gregory E. Cox ◽  
Timothy P. McNamara

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Huffman ◽  
Arne D. Ekstrom

AbstractWe present a detailed analysis of a widely used assay in human spatial cognition, the judgments of relative direction (JRD) task. We conducted three experiments involving virtual navigation interspersed with the JRD task, and included confidence judgments and map drawing as additional metrics. We also present a technique for assessing the similarity of the cognitive representations underlying performance on the JRD and map drawing tasks. Our results support the construct validity of the JRD task and its connection to allocentric representation. Additionally, we found that chance performance on the JRD task depends on the distribution of the angles of participants’ responses, rather than being constant and 90 degrees. Accordingly, we present a method for better determining chance performance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 846-869 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaoxiang Xie ◽  
Shiyi Li ◽  
Weidong Tao ◽  
Yiping Wei ◽  
Hong-jin Sun

Mou and McNamara have suggested that object locations are represented according to intrinsic reference frames. In three experiments, we investigated the limitations of intrinsic reference frames as a mean to represent object locations in spatial memory. Participants learned the locations of seven or eight common objects in a rectangular room and then made judgments of relative direction based on their memory of the layout. The results of all experiments showed that when all objects were positioned regularly, judgments of relative direction were faster or more accurate for novel headings that were aligned with the primary intrinsic structure than for other novel headings; however, when one irregularly positioned object was added to the layout, this advantage was eliminated. The experiments further indicated that with a single view at study, participants could represent the layout from either an egocentric orientation or a different orientation, according to experimental instructions. Together, these results suggest that environmental reference frames and intrinsic axes can influence performance for novel headings, but their role in spatial memory depends on egocentric experience, layout regularity, and instructions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document