coercive control
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

253
(FIVE YEARS 133)

H-INDEX

21
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
pp. 60-84
Author(s):  
Charlotte Barlow ◽  
Sandra Walklate
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
pp. 85-99
Author(s):  
Charlotte Barlow ◽  
Sandra Walklate

2022 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Charlotte Barlow ◽  
Sandra Walklate
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
pp. 41-59
Author(s):  
Charlotte Barlow ◽  
Sandra Walklate
Keyword(s):  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Barlow ◽  
Sandra Walklate
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Susan Lagdon ◽  
Julie-Ann Jordan ◽  
Paula Devine ◽  
Mark A. Tully ◽  
Cherie Armour ◽  
...  

AbstractCoercive control is characterised by negative behaviours which intimidate, threaten, and humiliate a person or restrict a person’s liberty. In addition to being a known risk factor for experiencing other forms of violence, research has linked coercive control to symptoms of psychological distress and suicidality. In the UK, coercive and controlling behaviours within intimate and familial relationships have been legislated as offending behaviours. However, there still exists a lack of international evidence on wider public knowledge and understanding of coercive control. The Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey (NILT) is an annual cross-sectional representative survey of social policy topics. Participants are adults aged 18 years or over. Concerning coercive control, respondents were presented with two relationship scenarios: obvious and less obvious coercive control. Following each scenario, respondents indicated their level of agreement to ten statements covering attitudes towards coercive control, victims of coercive control, talking about coercive control, and whether coercive control is a crime. Respondents indicated whether they had heard of the term ‘coercive control’. Predictors of coercive control awareness were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Mixed analysis of variance assessed if agreement levels to the ten statements varied by type of coercive control and victim gender. Most respondents said that they had heard of the term coercive control and knew what it meant. Those who had not heard of coercive control at all were more likely to be on a lower income, less qualified and younger, when compared to those who said they knew what the term meant. Significant interactions between coercive control type and victim gender were evident for all ten statements. While most respondents are aware of the term coercive control, a significant number have not and are therefore unlikely to recognise the signs of this type of abuse.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. i-v
Author(s):  
Kate Fitz-Gibbon ◽  
Sandra Walklate

This special issue brings together a group of international researchers at different career stages with one common interest: the extent to which recourse to the criminal law as a means of addressing men’s violence(s) serves the interests of women’s safety. It further explores Goodmark’s (2018) criminalisation thesis across different vital topics to consider how and under what conditions the criminalisation of men results in the punishment of women. In bringing together these different substantive areas of investigation (from the aftermath of the Spanish Civil War to debates concerning the criminalisation of prostitution, migration and the unintended consequences of criminalising coercive control), this collection provides a deeper analysis of the meaning of both criminalisation and punishment for women whose lives become entangled in and by this recourse to law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document